西安交通大学航天航空学院,710049,西安
核动力运行研究所,430074,武汉
北京航空航天大学自动化工程与电气工程学院,100191,北京
作者简介:韩捷(1981—),男,在职博士生,正高级工程师。
收稿:2025-08-19,
纸质出版:2026-06-10
移动端阅览
韩捷, 陈振茂, 陈兴乐. 采用参数反演的反应堆压力管间距涡流检测方法[J]. 西安交通大学学报, 2026,60(6):110-117.
HAN Jie, CHEN Zhenmao, CHEN Xingle. Eddy Current Testing Method for Pressure Tube Spacing of Heavy Water Reactors Based on Parameter Inversion[J]. Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University, 2026, 60(6): 110-117.
韩捷, 陈振茂, 陈兴乐. 采用参数反演的反应堆压力管间距涡流检测方法[J]. 西安交通大学学报, 2026,60(6):110-117. DOI: 10.7652/xjtuxb202606009.
HAN Jie, CHEN Zhenmao, CHEN Xingle. Eddy Current Testing Method for Pressure Tube Spacing of Heavy Water Reactors Based on Parameter Inversion[J]. Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University, 2026, 60(6): 110-117. DOI: 10.7652/xjtuxb202606009.
针对核电站重水反应堆压力管间距难以进行高效检测的问题,提出了一种基于参数反演的套管间距脉冲涡流检测方法,可用于重水堆压力管-排管、排管-停堆系统液体注入(LISS)管之间的间距检测。首先,基于双层套管建立脉冲涡流检测模型,采用最小二乘法进行参数反演;接着,利用数值迭代算法求解双层套管间距,得到的结果可直接用于检测压力管-排管的间距变化;然后,通过实验标定,拟合得到反演结果中外层排管壁厚与排管-LISS管间距之间的指数函数关系;最后,利用该函数关系确定排管-LISS管之间的间距。实验结果表明:基于参数反演的压力管-排管间距检测误差可控制在±0.5 mm以内,排管-LISS管的间距检测误差可控制在±1.1 mm以内,能够满足反应堆压力管现场检测结果(压力管-排管间距误差为±1mm、排管-LISS间距误差为±2mm)的精度要求。该研究可为压力管道的安全状态评估与风险管理提供可靠依据。
To address the challenge of efficiently testing the pressure tube spacing of heavy water reactors(HWRs)in nuclear power plants,a pulsed eddy current testing method for casing spacing based on parameter inversion is proposed.The method is used to test the spacing between pressure tubes and calandria tubes,as well as between calandria tubes and liquid injection shutdown system(LISS)tubes of HWRs.First,a pulsed eddy current testing model was established based on a double-layer casing to perform parameter inversion using the least squares.Next,the doublelayer casing spacing was solved via a numerical iterative algorithm,and the resulting values were directly applicable to testing variations in spacing between pressure tubes and calandria tubes. Subsequently,through experimental calibration,an exponential function relationship was fitted between the wall thickness of the outer calandria tube and the spacing between the calandria tube and LISS tube from the inversion results.Finally,the spacing between the calandria tube and LISS tube was determined using this function relationship.Experimental results show that the error for testing the spacing between the pressure tube and the calandria tube based on parameter inversion can be controlled within±0.5 mm,and that between the calandria tube and the LISS tube within±1.1 mm,meeting the accuracy requirements for on-site testing results of pressure tubes of HWRs(±1 mm for the spacing between the pressure tube and the calandria tube and ±2 mm for the spacing between the calandria tube and LISS tube).This study provides a reliable basis for safety assessment and risk management of pressure tubes.
SHOKRALLA S,SULLIVAN S,MORELLI J,et al. Modelling and validation of eddy current response to changes in factors affecting pressure tube to calandria tube gap measurement[J].NDT & EInternational,2015,73:15-21.
LULOFF M S.Concerning the exact solution for an internal transmit-receive eddy current probe at arbitrary locations and orientations within two non-concentric conductive tubes[J].NDT & EInternational,2020,116:102298.
LULOFF M S,CONTANT S,MORELLI J,et al. Simultaneous extraction of multiple parameters from a transmit-receive eddy current probe above a layered planar conductive structure [J].Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation,Diagnostics and Prognostics of Engineering Systems,2020,3(4):041104.
KLEIN G,MORELLI J,KRAUSE T W.Analytical model of the eddy current response of a drive-receive coil system inside two concentric tubes[J].NDT & E International,2018,96:18-25.
BAPAT H M,PADMANABHAN M,BANDYOPADHYAY M.Measurement of annular gap between pressure tube and calandria tube during in-service inspection of 220 MW Indian pressurized heavy water reactors(PHWRs)using eddy current technique[J]. Non-Destructive Evaluation,2016,22(6):341-347.
宾伟淇,孙杰,王亚星,等.超高压管式反应器内壁纵向裂纹的脉冲涡流检测[J].无损检测,2025,47(7):68-74.
BIN Weiqi,SUN Jie,WANG Yaxing,et al.Pulse eddy current detection of longitudinal cracks on inner wall of ultra-high pressure tubular reactor[J].Nondestructive Testing,2025,47(7):68-74.
SAKATA T,KISHIGAMI S,OGAWA Y,et al. Quantitative assessment of heavy-duty anticorrosion coating thickness via near-infrared measurements[J]. NDT & E International,2023,138:102893.
许鹏,耿明,方舟,等.基于复合电磁的高速轨道缺陷检测方法研究[J].机械工程学报,2021,57(18):57-65.
XU Peng,GENG Ming,FANG Zhou,et al.Study on high-speed rail defect detection method based on combination of EC and MFL testing [J].Journal of Mechanical Engineering,2021,57(18):57-65.
沈功田,李建,武新军.承压设备脉冲涡流检测技术研究及应用[J].机械工程学报,2017,53(4):49-58.
SEHN Gongtian,LI Jian,WU Xinjun.Research and application of pulsed eddy current testing technology for pressure equipment[J].Journal of Mechanical Engineering,2017,53(4):49-58.
ULAPANE N,ALEMPIJEVIC A,VALLS MIRO J,et al.Non-destructive evaluation of ferromagnetic material thickness using pulsed eddy current sensor detector coil voltage decay rate[J].NDT & EInternational,2018,100:108-114.
WEN Dongdong,FAN Mengbao,CAO Binghua,et al.Extraction of LOI features from spectral pulsed eddy current signals for evaluation of ferromagnetic samples [J].IEEE Sensors Journal,2019,19(1):189-195.
GUO Wei,GAO Bin,TIAN Guiyun,et al.Physic perspective fusion of electromagnetic acoustic transducer and pulsed eddy current testing in non-destructive testing system[J].Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society:A Mathematical Physical & Engineering Sciences,2020,378(2182):20190608.
XIE Shejuan,TIAN Mingming,XIAO Pan,et al.A hybrid nondestructive testing method of pulsed eddy current testing and electromagnetic acoustic transducer techniques for simultaneous surface and volumetric defects inspection [J].NDT & EInternational,2017,86:153-163.
CHEN Xingle,LI Jingwen,WANG Zhaohui.Inversion method in pulsed eddy current testing for wall thickness of ferromagnetic pipes [J].IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement,2020,69(12):9766-9773.
CHEN Xingle,LEI Yinzhao.Electrical conductivity measurement of ferromagnetic metallic materials using pulsed eddy current method[J].NDT & EInternational,2015,75:33-38.
CHEN Xingle,LIU Xiaoqian.Pulsed eddy current-based method for electromagnetic parameters of ferromagnetic materials[J].IEEE Sensors Journal,2021,21(5):6376-6383.
LI Yong,YAN Bei,LI Da,et al. Gradient-field pulsed eddy current probes for imaging of hidden corrosion in conductive structures[J].Sensors and Actuators:A Physical,2016,238:251-265.
WANG Zhenwei,YU Yating.Thickness and conductivity measurement of multilayered electricity-conducting coating by pulsed eddy current technique:experimental investigation [J].IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement,2019,68(9):3166-3172.
HUANG Pingjie,LUO Xuwei,HOU Dibo,et al. Lift-off nulling and internal state inspection of multilayer conductive structures by combined signal features in pulsed eddy current testing [J].Nondestructive Testing and Evaluation,2018,33(3):272-289.
WAQAR M,MEMON A M,SABIH M,et al.Composite pipelines:analyzing defects and advancements in non-destructive testing techniques [J]. Engineering Failure Analysis,2024,157:107914.
LI Zhen,MENG Zhaozong,WU Changcheng,et al. A new microwave cavity resonator sensor for measuring coating thickness on carbon fibre composites [J]. NDT & E International,2022,126:102584.
XIE Shejuan,YANG Shuyan,TIAN Mingming,et al.A hybrid nondestructive testing method of pulsed eddy current testing and electromagnetic acoustic transducer techniques based on wavelet analysis [J].NDT & E International,2023,138:102900.
DUAN Zhirong,XIE Shejuan,HUANG Lei,et al. Quantitative sizing of compound location defects based on PECT-EMAThybrid testing methods [J].Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing,2022,178,109267.
田明明,解社娟,韩捷,等.基于小波分析的脉冲涡流/电磁超声复合无损检测方法[J].中国机械工程,2019,30(16):1925-1930.
TIAN Mingming,XIE Shejuan,HAN Jie,et al.A hybridPECT/EMAT NDTbased on wavelet analysis[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering,2019,30(16):1925-1930.
WAN Benli,CHEN Xingle. Gap measurement of double-layer metal tube based on analytical solution of eddy current array under transmit-receive mode [J]. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement,2023,72:1-10.
0
浏览量
13
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621