1. 西安交通大学机械工程学院,西安,710049
2. 西安交通大学现代设计及转子轴承系统教育部重点实验室,西安,710049
3. 西安交通大学机械制造系统工程国家重点实验室,西安,710049
: 2022-12-21。作者简介: 孙鹏飞(1996—),男,博士生
李宝童(通信作者),男,教授,博士生导师。基金项目: 国家重点研发计划资助项目(2018YFB1700703)。
网络首发:2023-06-10,
纸质出版:2023
移动端阅览
孙鹏飞, 尹鹏, 刘宏磊, 等. 一种高比刚度盾构机刀盘面板结构拓扑重构设计[J]. 西安交通大学学报, 2023,57(6):86-94.
SUN Pengfei, YIN Peng, LIU Honglei, et al. Topological Reconstruction Design of Cutterhead Panel for Shield Machine with High Specific Stiffness[J]. 2023, 57(6): 86-94.
孙鹏飞, 尹鹏, 刘宏磊, 等. 一种高比刚度盾构机刀盘面板结构拓扑重构设计[J]. 西安交通大学学报, 2023,57(6):86-94. DOI: 10.7652/xjtuxb202306010.
SUN Pengfei, YIN Peng, LIU Honglei, et al. Topological Reconstruction Design of Cutterhead Panel for Shield Machine with High Specific Stiffness[J]. 2023, 57(6): 86-94. DOI: 10.7652/xjtuxb202306010.
为提高盾构机刀盘面板结构的承载能力
提出了一种考虑应力约束的高比刚度结构拓扑优化方法。首先
将多孔面板结构的开口率和强度作为约束条件
采用p范数将所有单元的局部应力凝聚为一个全局应力约束
限制多孔面板结构的最大全局应力
并以多孔面板结构的全局刚度最大化为优化目标
构建考虑最大全局应力的多约束拓扑优化模型; 其次
通过移动渐近线优化算法求解该模型
获得多孔面板结构的优化拓扑构型; 然后
采用水平集方法提取优化构型的清晰拓扑边界
并通过几何重构获取多孔面板结构模型; 最后
以某型盾构机为例
设计了多孔面板结构
并开展了静力学有限元仿真分析。仿真结果表明:在相同开口率条件下
相较于原有结构
所设计多孔面板结构的刚度和强度分别提升了7%和19.8%
承载能力得到了显著提高。所提出的方法能有效应用于盾构机面板结构的拓扑重构设计
丰富了盾构机刀盘面板结构的设计理论。
To improve load-bearing capacity of cutterhead panels of shield machines
a stress constraint-based topology optimization method for the structure with a high specific stiffness was proposed. Firstly
the open ratio and strength were regarded as constraints
p-norm was used to condense the local stress of all elements into a global stress constraint to limit the maximum global stress of porous panels. The maximum global stiffness of the panels was regarded as the optimization objective. A multi-constraint topology optimization model with the maximum global stress was built. Next
the method of moving asymptotes was applied to solve the model to obtain the optimized topology configuration of the panels. Then
the crisp boundary of the optimized configuration was extracted by the level set method
and the configuration was modeled by geometric reconstruction method. Finally
the porous panel of a certain shield machine was designed
and a static finite element analysis was performed on the panel. The results showed that compared with the existing panel
the designed panel with the same open ratio had higher stiffness and strength
which were improved by 7% and 19.8% respectively. The proposed method can be effectively applied in topological reconstruction design of cutterhead panels of shield machines and can enrich the design theory of the panels.
CAO Shunze, CUI Jian, FANG Yong, et al. Performance of slurry TBM tunnelling in sandy cobble ground: a case study in Lanzhou [J]. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 2019, 23(7): 3207-3217.[2] JIN Dalong, ZHANG Zhiyong, YUAN Dajun. Effect of dynamic cutterhead on face stability in EPB shield tunneling [J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2021, 110: 103827.[3] GUO Wei, HU Jing, LIU Jianqin. The scheme design for the earth pressure balance shield cutterhead structure [J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2014, 59(33): 4589-4599.[4] ROSTAMI J, CHANG S H. A closer look at the design of cutterheads for hard rock tunnel-boring machines [J]. Engineering, 2017, 3(6): 892-904.[5] XIA Yimin, YANG Mei, JI Zhiyong, et al. Design and dimension optimization of cutter disassembly mechanism for shield tunneling machine [J]. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 2021, 35(7): 3005-3018.[6] 暨智勇. 软土常压刀盘盘面开口及盘体结构优化设计研究 [J]. 隧道建设(中英文), 2021, 41(10): 1781-1793.JI Zhiyong.Optimization design of opening characteristics and structure of cutterhead in soft soil under atmospheric pressure [J]. Tunnel Construction, 2021, 41(10): 1781-1793.[7] HUO Junzhou, SUN Wei, CHEN Jing, et al. Disc cutters plane layout design of the full-face rock tunnel boring machine(TBM)based on different layout patterns [J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2011, 61(4): 1209-1225.[8] GENG Qi, BRULAND A, MACIAS F J. Analysis on the relationship between layout and consumption of face cutters on hard rock tunnel boring machines(TBMs)[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2018, 51(1): 279-297.[9] SUN Hongyan, GUO Wei, LIU Jianqin, et al. Layout design for disc cutters based on analysis of TBM cutter-head structure [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2018, 25(4): 812-830.[10] BURGER W. Design principles for soft ground cutterheads [C]//Rapid Excavation and Tunneling Conference. [S.l.]: [s.n.], 2007: 784-792.[11] LING Jingxiu, SUN Wei, HUO Junzhou, et al. Study of TBM cutterhead fatigue crack propagation life based on multi-degree of freedom coupling system dynamics [J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2015, 83: 1-14.[12] 田继涛, 黄晓华, 张言中, 等. 土压平衡盾构刀盘的力学分析及优化设计 [J]. 机械与电子, 2019, 37(11): 37-41.TIAN Jitao, HUANG Xiaohua, ZHANG Yanzhong, et al. Mechanical analysis and optimization design of earth pressure balance shield cutterhead [J]. Machinery & Electronics, 2019, 37(11): 37-41.[13] 罗丹. 某复合盾构刀盘有限元分析及参数优化 [J]. 现代隧道技术, 2020, 57(6): 115-119.LUO Dan. Finite element analysis and parameter optimization of the cutterhead of composite shield machines [J]. Modern Tunnelling Technology, 2020, 57(6): 115-119.[14] ALIZADEH R, ALLEN J K, MISTREE F. Managing computational complexity using surrogate models: a critical review [J]. Research in Engineering Design, 2020, 31(3): 275-298.[15] BISBO M K, HAMMER B. Efficient global structure optimization with a machine-learned surrogate model [J]. Physical Review Letters, 2020, 124(8): 086102.[16] 闫利鹏, 黄鸿颖, 杨骁, 等. 基于近似模型技术的高强钢盾构刀盘优化设计 [J]. 铁道科学与工程学报, 2021, 18(8): 2156-2164.YAN Lipeng, HUANG Hongying, YANG Xiao, et al. Optimization design of high strength steel shield cutter head based on approximate model technology [J]. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2021, 18(8): 2156-2164.[17] ZHANG Pin, CHEN Renpeng, WU Huaina. Real-time analysis and regulation of EPB shield steering using Random Forest [J]. Automation in Construction, 2019, 106: 102860.[18] XIA Yimin, TANG Lu, JI Zhiyong, et al. Optimal design of structural parameters for shield cutterhead based on fuzzy mathematics and multi-objective genetic algorithm [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2015, 22(3): 937-945.[19] 马军, 尹春洋, 李医中, 等. 基于聚合代理模型的土压平衡盾构刀盘轻量化设计方法 [J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2023, 29(1): 310-319.MA Jun, YIN Chunyang, LI Yizhong, et al.Lightweight design method of earth pressure balance shield cutter head based on ensemble surrogate model [J]. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 2023, 29(1): 310-319.[20] FERRARI F, SIGMUND O. A new generation 99 line Matlab code for compliance topology optimization and its extension to 3D [J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2020, 62(4): 2211-2228.[21] 孙鹏飞, 张跃, 尹鹏, 等. 隐式曲面梯度多孔结构拓扑优化设计方法 [J]. 西安交通大学学报, 2022, 56(1): 85-95.SUN Pengfei, ZHANG Yue, YIN Peng, et al. A topology optimization design method of graded cellular structures with implicit surfaces [J]. Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University, 2022, 56(1): 85-95.[22] SVANBERG K. The method of moving asymptotes: a new method for structural optimization [J]. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 1987, 24(2): 359-373.[23] 王雷, 闫素娜, 赵强强, 等. 基于单元过滤的自支撑结构拓扑优化方法 [J]. 西安交通大学学报, 2021, 55(5): 45-55.WANG Lei, YAN Suna, ZHAO Qiangqiang, et al. A topology optimization method for self-supporting structures based on element filtering [J]. Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University, 2021, 55(5): 45-55.[24] 艺游. 现代盾构3D模型[EB/OL]. [2022-12-01]. https://www.3d66.com/relation/xl3gR0_2045108. html.[25] 李斌斌. 某型土压平衡式盾构机刀盘的力学分析与结构优化 [D]. 兰州: 兰州交通大学, 2017.[26] LIU Feixiang, WANG Qingyang, JI Zhiyong, et al. Performance assessment and structural design of the atmospheric cutterhead of slurry shield machine [J]. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 2022, 36(11): 5611-5624.[27] 高见. 盾构机刀盘开口率与盘体结构优化设计 [D]. 大连: 大连理工大学, 2010.[28] 宋克志. 无水砂卵石地层盾构推力及刀盘转矩的计算 [J]. 建筑机械, 2004(10): 58-60, 63.SONG Kezhi. Calculation on thrust and cutter disc torque of shield in sandy cobble with no water [J]. Construction Machinery, 2004(10): 58-60, 63.[29] LE C, NORATO J, BRUNS T, et al. Stress-based topology optimization for continua [J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2010, 41(4): 605-620.[30] ZHAI Xiaoya, CHEN Falai, WU Jun. Alternating optimization of design and stress for stress-constrained topology optimization [J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2021, 64(4): 2323-2342.[31] DENG Hao, VULIMIRI P S, TO A C. An efficient 146-line 3D sensitivity analysis code of stress-based topology optimization written in MATLAB [J]. Optimization and Engineering, 2022, 23(3): 1733-1757.
0
浏览量
6
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621