西安交通大学能源与动力工程学院,西安,710049
: 2024-03-29。作者简介: 马骞(1995—),男,博士生
孙培伟(通信作者),男,副教授,博士生导师。基金项目: 国家自然科学基金资助项目(12075181)。
网络首发:2024-11-10,
纸质出版:2024
移动端阅览
马骞, 孙培伟, 魏新宇. 空间堆线性变参数模型预测控制方法[J]. 西安交通大学学报, 2024,58(11):164-175.
MA Qian, SUN Peiwei, WEI Xinyu. Predictive Control Method Based on Linear Varying Parameter Model for Space Nuclear Reactors[J]. 2024, 58(11): 164-175.
马骞, 孙培伟, 魏新宇. 空间堆线性变参数模型预测控制方法[J]. 西安交通大学学报, 2024,58(11):164-175. DOI: 10.7652/xjtuxb202411016.
MA Qian, SUN Peiwei, WEI Xinyu. Predictive Control Method Based on Linear Varying Parameter Model for Space Nuclear Reactors[J]. 2024, 58(11): 164-175. DOI: 10.7652/xjtuxb202411016.
针对传统PID控制方法在面临复杂负荷需求变化时无法满足空间核反应堆的控制性能需求的问题
提出了基于线性变参数模型的空间堆模型预测控制方法。针对强非线性特性
采用线性变参数模型作为预测模型
对全功率范围内的空间堆运行特性进行预测; 针对大时滞的特性
采用串级控制理论结合模型预测方法优化执行机构动作
提升被控量的响应速度。分别设计了电功率和冷却剂温度的预测控制系统
在典型工况下进行控制性能仿真验证
结果表明:相对于串级PID控制系统
所设计的预测控制系统的电功率调节时间减少了68.7%
冷却剂温度调节时间减少了81.7%; 电功率和冷却剂温度预测控制系统的核功率的超调量分别减少了22.3%和13.0%
保证了反应堆的安全; 控制系统的适用性强
在不同功率水平均具有良好的控制性能; 执行机构的动作大幅减少
驱动电机峰值电压下降了84.1%
使用寿命得到延长
系统经济性得到提升。该研究提出的结合串级控制理论基于线性变参数模型的预测控制方法能够用于优化空间堆的控制系统。
Space nuclear reactors exhibit strong nonlinearity and significant time delay characteristics. To address the challenge of traditional PID control methods failing to meet the control performance requirements of space nuclear reactors amidst complex load demand fluctuations
a predictive control approach based on a linear varying parameter model for space reactors is proposed. To tackle the pronounced nonlinearity
a linear varying parameter model is employed as the predictive model to anticipate the operational characteristics of space reactors across the entire power spectrum. To mitigate the notable time delay characteristics
the cascade control theory is combined with the model prediction method to optimize actuator actions
thereby enhancing the response speed of the controlled variable. Predictive control systems for electrical power and coolant temperature are individually designed
and control performance simulations are conducted under typical operational scenarios. The results indicate that compared to the cascade PID control system
the proposed predictive control system reduces power adjustment time by 68.7% and coolant temperature adjustment time by 81.7%. The nuclear power overshoots of predictive control systems for electrical power and coolant temperature are reduced by 22.3% and 13.0%
respectively
ensuring reactor safety. The control system demonstrates robust applicability and commendable control performance across various power levels. Additionally
a significant decrease in actuator actions is achieved
with a peak voltage drop of 84.1% for the drive motor
thereby extending its lifespan and enhancing system efficiency. Therefore
the proposed predictive control method based on the cascade control theory and linear varying parameter model can be used to optimize the control system of space reactors.
JOHNSON R A, MORGAN W T, ROCKLIN S R. Design, ground test and flight test of SNAP 10 A, first reactor in space [J]. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 1967, 5(1): 7-21.
BENNETT G L. A look at the Soviet space nuclear power program [C]// Proceedings of the 24th Intersociety Energy Conversion Engineering Conference. Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE, 1989: 1187-1194.
GRYAZNOV G M. 30th anniversary of the startup of topaz: the first thermionic nuclear reactor in the world [J]. Atomic Energy, 2000, 89(1): 510-515.
RHEE H S, WETCH J R, GUNTHER N, et al. Space-R thermionic space nuclear power system with single cell incore thermionic fuel elements [J]. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1992, 246(1): 120-129.
MATLOFF G L, JOHNSON L, MACCONE C. Helios and Prometheus: a solar/nuclear outer-solar system mission [J]. Journal of the British Interplanetary Society, 2007, 60(12): 439-442.
BUSHMAN A, CARPENTER D M, ELLIS T S, et al. The Martian surface reactor: an advanced nuclear power station for manned extraterrestrial exploration: MIT-NSA; TR-003[R]. Cambridge, MA, USA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2004.
POSTON D I, GIBSON M A, SANCHEZ R G, et al. Results of the KRUSTY nuclear system test [J]. Nuclear Technology, 2020, 206(S1): S89-S117.
MA Qian, SUN Peiwei, WEI Xinyu, et al. Dynamic model construction of a space thermionic nuclear reactor [J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2022, 212: 118644.
ALVAREZ-RAMIREZ J, PUEBLA H, ESPINOSA G. A cascade control strategy for a space nuclear reactor system [J]. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 2001, 28(2): 93-112.
SHTESSEL Y B. Sliding mode control of the space nuclear reactor system [J]. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 1998, 34(2): 579-589.
FU Jianghan, JIN Zhao, DAI Zhiwen, et al. Model predictive control for automatic operation of space nuclear reactors: design, simulation, and performance evaluation [J]. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 2024, 199: 110321.
MA Qian, SUN Peiwei, WEI Xinyu, et al. Control strategy study and cascade control system design for space thermionic nuclear reactor [J]. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2023, 414: 112626.
刘悦婷, 孟维华, 丁建中. 一种PID-PID串级控制系统的设计及其性能分析 [J]. 延边大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 49(4): 358-365.
LIU Yueting, MENG Weihua, DING Jianzhong. Design and performance analysis of a PID-PID cascade control system [J]. Journal of Yanbian University(Natural Science Edition), 2023, 49(4): 358-365.
马良玉, 燕梦, 王林, 等. 神经网络智能串级控制在过热器喷水减温系统中的应用 [J]. 华北电力大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 48(5): 106-112.
MA Liangyu, YAN Meng, WANG Lin, et al. Application of ANN-based intelligent cascade control to superheater water-spray desuperheating system [J]. Journal of North China Electric Power University(Natural Science Edition), 2021, 48(5): 106-112.
蒲松茂, 黄嘉俊, 孙培伟, 等. NUSTER-100电功率串级控制方法研究 [J]. 核动力工程, 2023, 44(4): 154-162.
PU Songmao, HUANG Jiajun, SUN Peiwei, et al. Research on cascade control method of electric power of NUSTER-100 [J]. Nuclear Power Engineering,2023, 44(4): 154-162.
姜峰, 陈振民. 全厂功率协调控制系统PID参数模拟整定 [J]. 电子技术与软件工程, 2019(19): 95-97.
JIANG Feng, CHEN Zhenmin. The PID parameters simulation and adjustment of the plant coordinated power control system [J]. Electronic Technology Software Engineering, 2019(19): 95-97.
李盛伟, 张来, 梁海深. 基于串级PID的相变储能电锅炉温度控制技术 [J]. 热能动力工程, 2020, 35(8): 85-89.
LI Shengwei, ZHANG Lai, LIANG Haishen. Temperature control technology of phase change energy storage electric boiler based on cascade PID [J]. Journal of Engineering for Thermal Energy and Power, 2020, 35(8): 85-89.
ZHANG Wenwen, MA Zaiyong, ZHANG Dalin, et al. Transient thermal-hydraulic analysis of a space thermionic reactor [J]. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 2016, 89: 38-49.
徐祖华. 模型预测控制理论及应用研究 [D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2004.
贠莹, 许鋆, 罗雄麟. 预测控制中存在模型失配时的卡尔曼滤波校正 [J]. 计算机与应用化学, 2017, 34(9): 673-680.
YUN Ying, XU Jun, LUO Xionglin. Kalman filter correction when there is model mismatch in model predictive control [J]. Computers and Applied Chemistry, 2017, 34(9): 673-680.
邢丽娟, 杨世忠. 线性变参数系统抗扰动鲁棒模型预测控制 [J]. 计算机仿真, 2023, 40(4): 282-285.
XING Lijuan, YANG Shizhong. Anti-disturbance robust model predictive control of linear variable parameter system [J]. Computer Simulation, 2023, 40(4): 282-285.[22] MA Qian, SUN Peiwei, WEI Xinyu, et al. State-space model construction and dynamic analysis for a space thermionic nuclear reactor [J]. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 2023, 163: 104816.
王丽辉, 汤健彬, 余世明. 克服广义预测控制模型参数失配的PID反馈校正策略 [J]. 浙江工业大学学报, 2005, 33(3): 265-267.
WANG Lihui, TANG Jianbin, YU Shiming. PID feedback correction strategy overcoming model parametric mismatch of GPC [J]. Journal of Zhejiang University of Technology, 2005, 33(3): 265-267.
赵攀, 戴义平, 夏俊荣, 等. 卡尔曼滤波修正的风电场短期功率预测模型 [J]. 西安交通大学学报, 2011, 45(5): 47-51.
ZHAO Pan, DAI Yiping, XIA Junrong, et al. A Kalman filter based correction model for short-term wind power prediction [J]. Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University, 2011, 45(5): 47-51.
邹凯, 蔡英凤, 陈龙, 等. 基于增量线性模型预测控制的无人车轨迹跟踪方法 [J]. 汽车技术, 2019(10): 1-7.
ZOU Kai, CAI Yingfeng, CHEN Long, et al. A path tracking method of self-driving vehicle based on incremental linear model predictive control [J]. Automobile Technology, 2019(10): 1-7.
王晓茹, 施展. 基于自适应预测步长的车辆主动转向跟踪控制 [J]. 农业装备与车辆工程, 2021, 59(7): 74-77.
WANG Xiaoru, SHI Zhan. Autonomous vehicle active steering tracking control based on adaptive prediction step [J]. Agricultural Equipment Vehicle Engineering, 2021, 59(7): 74-77.
0
浏览量
12
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621