不平衡工艺参数数据集的高温透平叶片铸件质量预测方法

朱铜; 艾松; 陈琨; 高建民

doi:10.7652/xjtuxb202409010

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

不平衡工艺参数数据集的高温透平叶片铸件质量预测方法

—————————————————————— | 更新时间：2025-07-28

- 不平衡工艺参数数据集的高温透平叶片铸件质量预测方法
- Quality Prediction Method of High Temperature Turbine Blade Castings Based on Unbalanced Process Parameter Data Set
- 西安交通大学学报 2024年58卷第9期页码：94-104
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 西安交通大学机械制造系统工程国家重点实验室,西安,710049
  2. 清洁高效透平动力装备全国重点实验室,四川,德阳,618000
- 作者简介：
  
  : 2024-02-19。作者简介: 朱铜(1998—),男,硕士生
  陈琨(通信作者),男,教授,博士生导师。基金项目: 国家重点研发计划资助项目(2021YFF0602300)。
- 基金信息：
  
  : 2024-02-19。作者简介: 朱铜(1998—),男,硕士生;陈琨(通信作者),男,教授,博士生导师。基金项目: 国家重点研发计划资助项目(2021YFF0602300)。
- DOI：10.7652/xjtuxb202409010
  中图分类号： TP182
- 网络首发：2024-09-10，
  
  纸质出版：2024
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
朱铜, 艾松, 陈琨, 等. 不平衡工艺参数数据集的高温透平叶片铸件质量预测方法[J]. 西安交通大学学报, 2024,58(9):94-104.

ZHU Tong, AI Song, CHEN Kun, et al. Quality Prediction Method of High Temperature Turbine Blade Castings Based on Unbalanced Process Parameter Data Set[J]. 2024, 58(9): 94-104.
朱铜, 艾松, 陈琨, 等. 不平衡工艺参数数据集的高温透平叶片铸件质量预测方法[J]. 西安交通大学学报, 2024,58(9):94-104. DOI： 10.7652/xjtuxb202409010.

ZHU Tong, AI Song, CHEN Kun, et al. Quality Prediction Method of High Temperature Turbine Blade Castings Based on Unbalanced Process Parameter Data Set[J]. 2024, 58(9): 94-104. DOI： 10.7652/xjtuxb202409010.

摘要

针对熔模精密铸造工艺参数数据集射线检测(RT)结果存在合格与不合格数量严重不平衡问题

提出一种基于概率分布的合成少数类集成学习(SyMProD-Stacking)的铸件质量预测方法。该方法首先对原始数据集进行预处理以保证数据质量

然后利用Z分数去除噪声数据

为每个少数类实例(不合格铸件)分配一个概率并基于此概率分布生成样本数据以获取平衡数据集

利用极端梯度提升模型(XGBoost)对所有工艺参数特征进行重要性排序并剔除部分排名靠后的工艺参数

最后将轻量级梯度提升机(LightGBM)、随机森林(RF)、支持向量机(SVM)和XGBoost模型进行Stacking集成并利用平衡数据集构建质量预测模型。以高温透平叶片制造过程精铸工艺为例

对所提出的质量预测方法进行验证

结果表明:相比于原始数据集构建的预测模型

利用了SyMProD过采样方法构建的预测模型不合格铸件的预测准确率提升了75.4%; 相比于单一算法模型

所提质量预测方法的曲线下面积(A

AUCROC

)、几何均值(G

)以及F

分数(F

)这3项性能指标分别提升了5.48%～11.59%、3.78%～8.92%、5.72%～11.39%

所提出的方法能够很好地预测高温透平叶片精铸过程在不平衡问题下的铸件质量。

Abstract

In response to the significant imbalance between the quantities of qualified and non-qualified results in the radiographic testing(RT)of the investment precision casting process parameters dataset

this paper proposes a casting quality prediction method using SyMProD-Stacking ensemble learning. The method begins by preprocessing the original dataset to ensure data quality. It then

employs Z-scores to eliminate noisy data

assigns a probability to each minority class instance(non-qualified castings)

and generates sample data based on this probability distribution to obtain a balanced dataset. XGBoost is used to rank the importance of all process parameter features and removes some of the lower-ranking parameters. Finally

the LightGBM

SVM

and XGBoost models are stacked together through ensemble learning

and a quality prediction model is constructed using the balanced dataset. Taking the precision casting process in the manufacturing of high-temperature turbine blades as an example

the proposed quality prediction method is validated. The results indicate that the predictive model constructed using the SyMProD oversampling method significantly outperforms the model built from the original dataset

with a 75.4% improvement in the accuracy of predicting non-qualified castings. Stacking ensemble learning

compared to individual algorithm models

achieves improvements of 5.48%—11.59%

3.78%—8.92%

and 5.72%—11.39% in terms of area under curve

geometric mean

and F

respectively.

关键词

Keywords

references

邹昌利, 张恃铭, 刘银华. 面向装配质量预测控制的随机Kriging建模方法 [J]. 机械设计与研究, 2020, 36(2): 108-112.

ZOU Changli, ZHANG Shiming, LIU Yinhua. Study on the stochastic Kringing modeling for predictive quality control in assembly process [J]. Machine Design & Research, 2020, 36(2): 108-112.

赵京鹤, 高明, 梁楠. 工业互联网助推制造企业数字化转型 [J]. 中国自动识别技术, 2022(1): 58-60.

ZHAO Jinghe, GAO Ming, LIANG Nan. Industrial internet promotes digital transformation of manufacturing enterprises [J]. China Auto-ID, 2022(1): 58-60.

GUO Haixiang, LI Yijing, SHANG J, et al. Learning from class-imbalanced data: review of methods and applications [J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2017, 73: 220-239.

YADAV S S, BHOLE G P. Learning from imbalanced data in classification [J]. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 2020, 8(5): 1007-1016.

DOUZAS G, BACAO F, LAST F. Improving imbalanced learning through a heuristic oversampling method based on k-means and SMOTE [J]. Information Sciences, 2018, 465: 1-20.

PIRI S, DELEN D, LIU Tieming. A synthetic informative minority over-sampling(SIMO)algorithm leveraging support vector machine to enhance learning from imbalanced datasets [J]. Decision Support Systems, 2018, 106: 15-29.

李艳霞, 柴毅, 胡友强, 等. 不平衡数据分类方法综述 [J]. 控制与决策, 2019, 34(4): 673-688.

LI Yanxia, CHAI Yi, HU Youqiang, et al. Review of imbalanced data classification methods [J]. Control and Decision, 2019, 34(4): 673-688.

CHAWLA N V, BOWYER K W, HALL L O, et al. SMOTE: synthetic minority over-sampling technique [J]. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 2002, 16(1): 321-357.

HAN Hui, WANG Wenyuan, MAO Binghuan. Borderline-SMOTE: a new over-sampling method in imbalanced data sets learning [C]//Advances in Intelligent Computing. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2005: 878-887.

HE Haibo, BAIYang, GARCIA E A, et al. ADASYN: adaptive synthetic sampling approach for imbalanced learning [C]//2008 IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks(IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence). Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE, 2008: 1322-1328.

DOUZAS G, BACAO F, LAST F. Improving imbalanced learning through a heuristic oversampling method based on k-means and SMOTE [J]. Information Sciences, 2018, 465: 1-20.

李敏波, 董伟伟. 面向不平衡数据集的汽车零部件质量预测 [J]. 中国机械工程, 2022, 33(1): 88-96.

LI Minbo, DONG Weiwei. Quality prediction of automotive parts for imbalanced datasets [J]. China Mechanical Engineering, 2022, 33(1): 88-96.

KUNAKORNTUM I, HINTHONG W, PHUNCHONGHARN P. A synthetic minority based on probabilistic distribution(SyMProD)oversampling for imbalanced datasets [J]. IEEE Access, 2020, 8: 114692-114704.

ZHOU Ping, JIANG Yue, WEN Chaoyao, et al. Data modeling for quality prediction using improved orthogonal incremental random vector functional-link networks [J]. Neurocomputing, 2019, 365: 1-9.

ZHENG Wenjian, LIU Yi, GAO Zengliang, et al. Just-in-time semi-supervised soft sensor for quality prediction in industrial rubber mixers [J]. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 2018, 180: 36-41.

高建琛. 基于集成学习的铝合金薄板带材力学性能预测方法研究 [D]. 北京: 北京工业大学, 2020.

LU Ningyun, GAO Furong. Stage-based online quality control for batch processes [J]. Industrial Engineering Chemistry Research, 2006, 45(7): 2272-2280.

李传维. 核电压力容器大型锻件组织与性能研究及热处理数值模拟 [D]. 上海: 上海交通大学, 2016.

杨健, 吴思炜. 基于机器学习的钢铁轧制过程性能预测 [J]. 钢铁, 2021, 56(9): 1-9.

YANG Jian, WU Siwei. Property prediction of steel rolling process based on machine learning [J]. Iron Steel, 2021, 56(9): 1-9.[20] 董海, 冯晔. 基于XGBoost的车身尺寸装配质量智能预测模型 [J]. 工业工程, 2021, 24(3): 77-82.

DONG Hai, FENG Ye. An intelligent prediction model of body size assembly quality based on XGBoost algorithm [J]. Industrial Engineering Journal, 2021, 24(3): 77-82.

DUAN Guijiang, YAN Xin. A real-time quality control system based on manufacturing process data [J]. IEEE Access, 2020, 8: 208506-208517.

赵双凤. 基于MES的机加车间制造过程工序质量控制方法与系统研究 [D]. 重庆: 重庆大学, 2016.

于文靖. 汽轮机模锻叶片加工质量预测及控制方法研究 [D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学, 2018.

钟武昌, 战洪飞, 林颖俊, 等. 基于机器学习多算法集成的产品质量问题预测方法 [J]. 机械设计与研究, 2023, 39(5): 100-107.

ZHONG Wuchang, ZHAN Hongfei, LIN Yingjun, et al. Product quality problem prediction method based on machine learning multi algorithm integration [J]. Machine Design Research, 2023, 39(5): 100-107.

向峰, 杨磊, 张萌, 等. 基于模型融合的复杂生产过程产品质量预测 [J]. 中国科学(技术科学), 2023, 53(7): 1127-1137.

XIANG Feng, YANG Lei, ZHANG Meng, et al.Model fusion based product quality prediction for complex manufacturing process [J]. Scientia Sinica(Technologica), 2023, 53(7): 1127-1137.

浏览量

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

图像分割的谱聚类集成算法

一种新的选择性支持向量机集成学习算法

用于木马流量检测的集成分类模型

应用非线性加权的集成学习软件缺陷序列预测算法

电动车辆间接热系统快速除湿响应迟滞机理及优化控制策略