平准化成本的加氢站供氢路径分析比较研究

霍天晴; 刘家璇; 李东; 刘奇峰; 王斌; 杨福胜; 吴震; 方涛; 张早校

doi:10.7652/xjtuxb202402008

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

平准化成本的加氢站供氢路径分析比较研究

更新时间：2025-05-13

- 平准化成本的加氢站供氢路径分析比较研究
- Analysis and Comparison of Hydrogen Supply Paths of Hydrogen RefuelingStation Based on the Levelized Cost
- 西安交通大学学报 2024年58卷第2期页码：79-90
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 西安交通大学化学工程与技术学院,西安,710049
  2. 国家电投集团广州分公司,广州,511455
  3. 陕西氢易能源科技有限公司,西安,710049
- 作者简介：
  
  : 2023-04-18。作者简介: 霍天晴(1999—),男,硕士生
  杨福胜(通信作者),男,教授,博士生导师。基金项目: 国家自然科学基金资助项目(52076178,22005236)
- 基金信息：
  
  : 2023-04-18。作者简介: 霍天晴(1999—),男,硕士生;杨福胜(通信作者),男,教授,博士生导师。基金项目: 国家自然科学基金资助项目(52076178,22005236);国家电投集团广东电力有限公司科研资助项目(GZGS-KYCL-2022-001)。
- DOI：10.7652/xjtuxb202402008
  中图分类号： TK91
- 网络首发：2024-02-10，
  
  纸质出版：2024
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
霍天晴, 刘家璇, 李东, 等. 平准化成本的加氢站供氢路径分析比较研究[J]. 西安交通大学学报, 2024,58(2):79-90.

HUO Tianqing, LIU Jiaxuan, LI DONG, et al. Analysis and Comparison of Hydrogen Supply Paths of Hydrogen RefuelingStation Based on the Levelized Cost[J]. 2024, 58(2): 79-90.
霍天晴, 刘家璇, 李东, 等. 平准化成本的加氢站供氢路径分析比较研究[J]. 西安交通大学学报, 2024,58(2):79-90. DOI： 10.7652/xjtuxb202402008.

HUO Tianqing, LIU Jiaxuan, LI DONG, et al. Analysis and Comparison of Hydrogen Supply Paths of Hydrogen RefuelingStation Based on the Levelized Cost[J]. 2024, 58(2): 79-90. DOI： 10.7652/xjtuxb202402008.

摘要

为保证加氢站氢气供应、降低氢气终端价格

对不同加氢站供氢路径的经济可行性与适用场景进行了探讨。研究基于氢气的平准化成本建立了典型外供氢加氢站与站内制氢加氢站的经济模型

并对制氢原材料成本、氢气运输距离、能耗等关键影响因素进行敏感度分析

探究了不同来源和供给模式下氢气终端成本的形成机制。此外

通过建立生命周期模型

分析未来可能的碳税对于氢气消费终端价格的影响。结果表明

运输距离与单车承载量是外供氢路径下影响终端成本的主要因素

在考虑碳税情况下这种影响更为显著

而站内制氢路径下影响成本的主要因素为原材料价格和制氢能耗。有机液体储氢运输经济运输距离为220～1 700 km

可覆盖我国主要大规模氢气运输场景; 天然气站内重整在天然气供应充足、价格低于4元/m

时优势明显; 站内电解水与可再生能源发电结合经济和环境优势明显

供氢价格可维持在35元/kg以下。研究指明了我国加氢站不同供氢方式的未来发展方向

为供氢路径选择提供了可靠的经济评价方法

有望对加氢站建设与地区氢能发展政策制定提供有益参考。

Abstract

In order to ensure the hydrogen supply of hydrogen refueling stations and lower the terminal price of hydrogen

the economic feasibility and application scenarios of different hydrogen supply paths of hydrogen refueling stations are explored. To study the economic feasibility of different hydrogen supply paths

the levelized cost of hydrogen is adopted to establish cost and price models for several typical hydrogen refueling stations with hydrogen supplied externally or hydrogen produced within the stations. The sensitivity analysis of key factors such as raw material cost of hydrogen production

hydrogen transportation distance and

energy consumption are carried out to explore the pricing mechanism of hydrogen supplied from different sources and in different modes. In addition

a life cycle model was established to analyze the impact of carbon tax possibly imposed in the future on the terminal price of hydrogen consumption. The results show that the transportation distance and carrying capacity of single vehicle are the factors having major impact on the cost of hydrogen refueling stations with external hydrogen supply

and such influences are more significant if carbon tax is taken into consideration. The costs of self-produced hydrogen for hydrogen refueling station are mainly under the influence of raw material price and the energy used for hydrogen production. The economical distance for organic liquid hydrogen storage and transportation is 220—1 700 km

which is able to cover most scenarios of large-scale hydrogen transportation in China. Natural gas reforming in station has obvious advantages when the supply of natural gas is sufficient and the price is lower than RMB 4/m

. The combination of in-station water electrolysis and renewable power generation show economic and environmental advantages

and the hydrogen price can be maintained below RMB 35/kg. The study points out the future development direction of different hydrogen supply modes in China

and provides a reliable economic evaluation method for selection of hydrogen supply path. Hopefully the study can serve as reference for the construction of hydrogen refueling stations and policy making for regional hydrogen energy development.

关键词

Keywords

references

刘晓慧. 《氢能产业发展中长期规划(2021—2035年)》发[N].中国矿业报, 2022-03-24(001).

徐硕, 余碧莹. 中国氢能技术发展现状与未来展望 [J]. 北京理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2021, 23(6): 1-12.

XU Shuo, YU Biying. Current development and prospect of hydrogen energy technology in China [J]. Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology(Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 23(6): 1-12.

熊亚林, 许壮, 王雪颖, 等. 我国加氢基础设施关键技术及发展趋势分析 [J]. 储能科学与技术, 2022, 11(10): 3391-3400.

XIONG Yalin, XU Zhuang, WANG Xueying, et al. Analysis of key technologies and development trends of hydrogen refueling stations in China [J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2022, 11(10): 3391-3400.

刘峻, 赵汪,高学强, 等. 全球加氢站产业、技术及标准进展综述 [J]. 太阳能学报, 2022, 43(6): 362-372.

LIU Jun, ZHAO Wang, GAO Xueqiang, et al. Review on advances in industry, technology, and standard of global hydrogen refuelling stations [J]. Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica, 2022, 43(6): 362-372.

蒲亮, 余海帅, 代明昊, 等. 氢的高压与液化储运研究及应用进展 [J]. 科学通报, 2022, 67(19): 2172-2191.

PU Liang, YU Haishuai, DAI Minghao, et al. Research progress and application of high-pressure hydrogen and liquid hydrogen in storage and transportation [J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2022, 67(19): 2172-2191.

冯成, 周雨轩, 刘洪涛. 氢气存储及运输技术现状及分析 [J]. 科技资讯, 2021, 19(25): 44-46.

FENG Cheng, ZHOU Yuxuan, LIU Hongtao. Current situation and analysis of hydrogen storage and transportation Technology [J]. Science Technology Information, 2021, 19(25): 44-46.

邹才能, 李建明, 张茜, 等. 氢能工业现状、技术进展、挑战及前景 [J]. 天然气工业, 2022, 42(4): 1-20.

ZOU Caineng, LI Jianming, ZHANG Qian, et al. Industrial status, technological progress, challenges and prospects of hydrogen energy [J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2022, 42(4): 1-20.

单彤文, 宋鹏飞, 李又武, 等. 制氢、储运和加注全产业链氢气成本分析 [J]. 天然气化工(C1化学与化工), 2020, 45(1): 85-90, 96.

SHAN Tongwen, SONG Pengfei, LI Youwu, et al. Cost analysis of hydrogen from the perspective of the whole industrial chain of production, storage, transportation and refueling [J]. Natural Gas Chemical Industry, 2020, 45(1): 85-90, 96.

张轩, 樊昕晔, 吴振宇, 等. 氢能供应链成本分析及建议 [J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(5): 2364-2371.

ZHANG Xuan, FAN Xinye, WU Zhenyu, et al. Hydrogen energy supply chain cost analysis and suggestions [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2022, 41(5): 2364-2371.

李妍, 常皓明, 林世响, 等. 外供氢与现场制氢加氢站的氢气成本分析 [J]. 煤气与热力, 2022, 42(3): 26-29.

LI Yan, CHANG Haoming, LIN Shixiang, et al. Hydrogen cost analysis of external hydrogen supply and on-site hydrogen production refueling station [J]. Gas Heat, 2022, 42(3):26-29.

WEINERT J X, LIU Shaojun, OGDEN J M, et al. Hydrogen refueling station costs in Shanghai [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2007, 32(16): 4089-4100.

付亚轩, 张丹, 隋朝霞. 中国加氢站商业模式及经济性比较 [J]. 油气与新能源, 2022, 34(5): 8-13.

FU Yaxuan, ZHANG Dan, SUI Chaoxia. Business modes of China's hydrogen refueling stations and the economics comparation [J]. Petroleum and New Energy, 2022, 34(5): 8-13.

黄宣旭, 练继建, 沈威, 等. 中国规模化氢能供应链的经济性分析 [J]. 南方能源建设, 2020, 7(2): 1-13.

HUANG Xuanxu, LIAN Jijian, SHEN Wei, et al. Economic analysis of China's large-scale hydrogen energy supply chain [J]. Southern Energy Construction, 2020, 7(2): 1-13.

JAMES B D, DESANTIS D A, SAUR G. Final report: hydrogen production pathways cost analysis(2013- 2016)[EB/OL].(2016-09-30)[2023-01-12]. https://doi.org/10.2172/1346418.

MINTZ M, ELGOWAINY A, GILLETTE J, et al. HDSAM 2.0: expanded capabilities, enhanced results in hydrogen delivery modeling [EB/OL].(2008-04-01)[2023-01-12]. https://nha.confex.com/nha/2008/techprogram/P4291.HTM.

KHAMIS I, MALSHE U D. HEEP: a new tool for the economic evaluation of hydrogen economy [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2010, 35(16): 8398-8406.

游双矫. 中石油为雄安新区供氢方式优化的研究 [D]. 北京: 中国石油大学(北京), 2020.

闫喻婷. 氢气储运方式的经济性对比研究 [D]. 武汉: 华中科技大学, 2021.

GU Yu, CHEN Qianqian, XUE Junli, et al. Comparative techno-economic study of solar energy integrated hydrogen supply pathways for hydrogen refueling stations in China [J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2020, 223: 113240.

CHEN Qianqian, GU Yu, TANG Zhiyong, et al. Optimal design and techno-economic assessment of low-carbon hydrogen supply pathways for a refueling station located in Shanghai [J]. Energy, 2021, 237: 121584.

朱琴君, 祝俊宗. 国内液氢加氢站的发展与前景 [J]. 煤气与热力, 2020, 40(7): 15-19.

ZHU Qinjun, ZHU Junzong. Development and prospect of liquid hydrogen refueling stations in China [J]. Gas Heat, 2020, 40(7):15-19.

BYUN M, LEE A, CHEON S, et al. Preliminary feasibility study for hydrogen storage using several promising liquid organic hydrogen carriers: technical, economic, and environmental perspectives [J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2022, 268: 116001.

GÖKÇEK M, KALE C. Techno-economical evaluation of a hydrogen refuelling station powered by wind-PV hybrid power system: a case study for Izmir-ÇŞme [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2018, 43(23): 10615-10625.

李庆勋, 刘晓彤, 刘克峰, 等. 大规模工业制氢工艺技术及其经济性比较 [J]. 天然气化工(C1化学与化工), 2015, 40(1): 78-82.

LI Qingxun, LIU Xiaotong, LIU Kefeng, et al. Technical and economic analysis for large-scale industrial hydrogen production [J]. Gas Chemical Industry, 2015, 40(1): 78-82.

CARRIVEAU T. Methane and hydrogen tor energy storage [R]. Bloomberg NEF, 2016.

殷靓, 巨永林. 氢液化流程设计和优化方法研究进展 [J]. 制冷学报, 2020, 41(3): 1-10.

YIN Liang, JU Yonglin. Review on researches and developments of the design and optimization for hydrogen liquefaction processes [J]. Journal of Refrigeration, 2020, 41(3): 1-10.

吕翠, 王金阵, 朱伟平, 等. 氢液化技术研究进展及能耗分析 [J]. 低温与超导, 2019, 47(7): 11-18.

LV Cui, WANG Jinzhen, ZHU Weiping, et al. Research progress and energy consumption analysis of hydrogen liquefaction technology [J]. Cryogenics and Superconductivity, 2019, 47(7): 11-18.

花飞, 龚朝兵, 孔令健, 等. 有机液体储氢材料的研究与应用 [J]. 石油化工技术与经济, 2022, 38(4): 53-56.

HUA Fei, GONG Chaobing, KONG Lingjian, et al. Research development and applications of liquid organic hydrogen carriers [J]. Technology Economics in Petrochemicals, 2022, 38(4): 53-56.

王周. 天然气制氢、甲醇制氢与水电解制氢的经济性对比探讨 [J]. 天然气技术与经济, 2016, 10(6): 47-49, 83.

WANG Zhou. Discussion on economic comparison of hydrogen production by natural gas, methanol and water electrolysis [J]. Natural Gas Technology and Economy, 2016, 10(6): 47-49, 83.

SONG Pengfei, SUI Yiyan, SHAN Tongwen, et al. Assessment of hydrogen supply solutions for hydrogen fueling station: a Shanghai case study [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2020, 45(58): 32884-32898.

中国化学品安全协会. 加氢站氢运输及配送安全技术规范: T/CCSAS 018-2022 [S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2022.

王震, 孔盈晧, 李梦祎. 新形势下中国天然气安全态势研究 [J]. 天然气与石油, 2023, 41(1): 1-7.

WANG Zhen, KONG Yinghao, LI Mengyi. Research on the supply security of China's natural gas under the new situation [J]. Natural Gas and Oil, 2023, 41(1): 1-7.

张瑞, 马远. 基于产业链视角的中国天然气价格形成机制改革策略研究 [J]. 价格月刊, 2023(4): 21-26.

ZHANG Rui, MA Yuan. Research on China's natural gas price formation mechanism reform strategy based on the perspective of industrial chain [J]. Prices Monthly, 2023(4): 21-26.

高芸, 王怡平, 胡迤丹, 等. 2022年中国天然气发展述评及2023年展望 [J]. 天然气技术与经济, 2023, 17(1): 1-10.

GAO Yun, WANG Yiping, HU Yidan, et al. China's natural gas development: 2022 review and 2023 outlook [J]. Natural Gas Technology and Economy, 2023, 17(1): 1-10.

牟初夫, 王礼茂, 屈秋实, 等. 主要新能源发电替代减排的研究综述 [J]. 资源科学, 2017, 39(12): 2323-2334.

MOU Chufu, WANG Limao, QU Qiushi, et al. Review of emission reduction research on major new energy generation [J]. Resources Science, 2017, 39(12): 2323-2334.

陈立斌. 可再生能源与核电减排二氧化碳经济性分析 [J]. 中外能源, 2016, 21(11): 30-34.

CHEN Libin. Economic analysis of carbon dioxide emission reduction by using renewable and nuclear energy sources [J]. Sino-Global Energy, 2016, 21(11): 30-34.

覃盈盈. “双碳”目标下中国碳税开征的逻辑起点、国际借鉴和政策设计 [J]. 西南金融, 2022(8): 27-42.

QIN Yingying. The logical starting point, international reference and policy design of China's carbon tax collection under the “carbon peaking and carbon neutrality” goal [J]. Southwest Finance, 2022(8): 27-42.

田冠军, 陈雪梅, 王宝顺. “碳税”的国际进展、演进逻辑与推进策略 [J]. 会计之友, 2023(5): 46-52.

TIAN Guanjun, CHEN Xuemei, WANG Baoshun. International progress, evolution logic and promotion strategy of carbon tax [J]. Friends of Accounting, 2023(5): 46-52.

浏览量

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

高压/超高压压缩机关键技术研究与应用进展

离子液体改性燃料的电流体动力学效应研究

冷库水平空气幕热湿阻隔性能数值模拟研究

采用试验设计方法的第三代CO2气体箔轴承箔片几何参数敏感性分析

三塔合一间接空冷系统结构参数对夏季运行特性的影响研究