1. 西安交通大学化学工程与技术学院,西安,710049
2. 深圳市燃气集团股份有限公司,广东,深圳,518049
: 2023-03-15。作者简介: 张成龙(2000—),男,硕士生
张永海(通信作者),男,副教授,博士生导师。基金项目: 国家重点研发计划“氢能技术”重点专项资助项目(2021YFB4001603)
网络首发:2024-02-10,
纸质出版:2024
移动端阅览
张成龙, 李俊磊, 张永海, 等. 综合管廊中掺氢天然气泄漏安全性分析[J]. 西安交通大学学报, 2024,58(2):22-30.
ZHANG Chenglong, LI Junlei, ZHANG Yonghai, et al. Safety Analysis of Hydrogen-Blended Natural Gas Leakage in Comprehensive Pipe Gallery[J]. 2024, 58(2): 22-30.
张成龙, 李俊磊, 张永海, 等. 综合管廊中掺氢天然气泄漏安全性分析[J]. 西安交通大学学报, 2024,58(2):22-30. DOI: 10.7652/xjtuxb202402003.
ZHANG Chenglong, LI Junlei, ZHANG Yonghai, et al. Safety Analysis of Hydrogen-Blended Natural Gas Leakage in Comprehensive Pipe Gallery[J]. 2024, 58(2): 22-30. DOI: 10.7652/xjtuxb202402003.
为了解掺氢等多因素耦合对管道输送中掺氢燃气泄漏扩散的影响
针对3种常见燃气输送场景中的地下综合管廊
从其受限空间易导致燃气云积聚爆燃的特性出发
考虑不同泄漏方向、掺氢比、管道压力等影响因素
使用Fluent软件对综合管廊内可能出现的泄漏场景进行模拟
研究了其内部燃气的分布特性
并对报警探针位置及其间距设置进行了安全性分析。模拟结果表明:泄漏口朝向会严重影响贴壁燃气分布
二次流近壁区的燃气积聚更加明显
在侧壁距顶部30 cm处安装探针能有效降低报警延迟; 当掺氢体积分数为20%时
泄漏速度提高了9.03%
导致泄漏口近端的燃气积聚加剧而泄漏口远端的风险略微增加; 燃气泄漏5 s时的爆炸浓度(燃气摩尔分数大于4%)区间距离为1.54 m
添加10%、20%的氢气可使该距离分别增加16.2%(1.79 m)、36.4%(2.10 m); 当管道压力增加至0.8、1.2、1.6 MPa时
达到报警浓度的时间分别缩短了18.9%、28.3%、32.1%。研究可为综合管廊内掺氢天然气的输运安全提供参考。
In order to understand the impact of various coupled factors
such as hydrogen blending
on the dispersion of hydrogen-blended gas leakage in pipeline transportation is studied based on the underground comprehensive pipe galleries in three common gas transmission scenarios. The study starts from the feature that confined space is prone to cause gas cloud accumulation and combustion
with consideration given to factors such as different leakage directions
hydrogen doping ratios
and pipeline pressures
and the simulation of potential leakage scenarios within the comprehensive pipe galleries is conducted using Fluent software. The distribution characteristics of internal gases are examined
and a safety analysis of alarm probe positioning and spacing is performed. The simulation results show that the distribution of gas is significantly influenced by the directions of the leakage port
with a more obvious accumulation of gas observed in the near-wall region of secondary flows. The installation of probes at a distance of 30 cm from the top of the side walls effectively reduces alarm delays. With a 20% hydrogen blending
the leakage rate increases by 9.03%
leading to an intensification of gas accumulation near the leakage port and a slight increase in risk at the distant end of the port. The explosion concentration range(gas concentration >4%)at 5 seconds of gas leakage is found to be 1.54 m
and the addition of 10% and 20% hydrogen increases this distance by 16.2%(1.79 m)and 36.4%(2.10 m)
respectively. Furthermore
as pipeline pressure increases to 0.8
1.2
1.6 MPa
the time required to reach the alarm concentration is respectively shortened by 18.9%
28.3%
32.1%. Valuable insights for the safe transportation of hydrogen-blended natural gas in comprehensive pipe galleries can be provided by this study.
任若轩, 游双矫, 朱新宇, 等. 天然气掺氢输送技术发展现状及前景 [J]. 油气与新能源, 2021, 33(4): 26-32.
REN Ruoxuan, YOU Shuangjiao, ZHU Xinyu, et al. Development status and prospects of hydrogen compressed natural gas transportation technology [J]. Petroleum and New Energy, 2021, 33(4): 26-32.
尚娟, 鲁仰辉, 郑津洋, 等. 掺氢天然气管道输送研究进展和挑战 [J]. 化工进展, 2021, 40(10): 5499-5505.
SHANG Juan, LU Yanghui, ZHENG Jinyang, et al. Research status-in-situ and key challenges in pipeline transportation of hydrogen-natural gas mixtures [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2021, 40(10): 5499-5505.
MORADI R, GROTH K M. Hydrogen storage and delivery: review of the state of the art technologies and risk and reliability analysis [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2019, 44(23): 12254-12269.
MA Houyi, CHENG Xiaoliang, LI Guiqiu, et al. The influence of hydrogen sulfide on corrosion of iron under different conditions [J]. Corrosion Science, 2000, 42(10): 1669-1683.
徐鹏, 潘丹丹, 袁勋, 等. 燃气管道泄漏扩散研究进展 [J]. 油气储运, 2022, 41(1): 21-28.
XU Peng, PAN Dandan, YUAN Xun, et al. Progress of research on leakage diffusion of gas pipelines [J]. Oil Gas Storage and Transportation, 2022, 41(1): 21-28.
KUCZYNSKI S, ACIAK M, OLIJNYK A, et al. Thermodynamic and technical issues of hydrogen and methane-hydrogen mixtures pipeline transmission [J]. Energies, 2019, 12(3): 569.
TAGHVAEI M, BECK S B M, STASZEWSKI W J. Leak detection in pipelines using cepstrum analysis [J]. Measurement Science and Technology, 2006, 17(2): 367.
ARYSTANBEKOVA N K. Application of Gaussian plume models for air pollution simulation at instantaneous emissions [J]. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 2004, 67(4/5): 451-458.
马梅, 蒋仲安. 隧道内埋地燃气管道泄漏扩散规律研究 [J]. 石油与天然气化工, 2022, 51(1): 132-137.
MA Mei, JIANG Zhong'an. Study on leakage and diffusion law of buried gas pipeline in tunnel [J]. Chemical Engineering of Oil Gas, 2022, 51(1): 132-137.
钟庆. 埋地燃气管道小孔泄漏侵扰下土体电阻率响应规律研究 [D]. 淮南: 安徽理工大学, 2021.
袁欣然, 许淑惠, 徐荣吉, 等. 综合管廊燃气舱燃气管道泄漏扩散规律研究 [J]. 消防科学与技术, 2019, 38(6): 802-806.
YUAN Xinran, XU Shuhui, XU Rongji, et al. The study of gas leakage and diffusion law on utility tunnel's gas tan [J]. Fire Science and Technology, 2019, 38(6): 802-806.
夏海林, 邓志辉. 综合管廊截面形式对燃气扩散规律影响研究 [J]. 制冷与空调, 2022, 36(4): 551-555.
XIA Hailin, DENG Zhihui. Influence of cross section form on natural gas leakage and diffusion in natural gas pipeline cabin of utility tunnel [J]. Refrigeration Air Conditioning, 2022, 36(4): 551-555.
LIU Chengcheng, WANG Deguo, GUO Yanbao, et al. Research on diffusion behaviors of leaked natural gas in urban underground utility tunnels [C]//2019 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation. Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE, 2019: 2076-2081.
赵国明, 田贯三. 燃气管廊内不同通风形式的探究 [J]. 洁净与空调技术, 2020(2): 75-79.
ZHAO Guoming, TIAN Guansan. Study on different ventilation forms in gas pipe gallery [J]. Contamination Control Air-Conditioning Technology, 2020(2): 75-79.
韦守朋. 地下管廊燃气泄漏扩散及控制方法研究 [D]. 徐州: 中国矿业大学, 2019.
张书豪, 彭世尼, 杜建梅, 等. 综合管廊水气共舱情况下的燃气泄漏研究 [J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2020, 16(S1): 365-370.
ZHANG Shuhao, PENG Shini, DU Jianmei, et al. Research on gas leakage in water-gas compartment in utility tunnel [J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2020, 16(S1): 365-370.
EBRAHIMI-MOGHADAM A, FARZANEH-GORD M, ARABKOOHSAR A, et al. CFD analysis of natural gas emission from damaged pipelines: correlation development for leakage estimation [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 199: 257-271.
BU Fanxi, LIU Yang, WANG Zhixue, et al. Analysis of natural gas leakage diffusion characteristics and prediction of invasion distance in utility tunnels [J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2021, 96: 104270.
杨永, 何仁洋, 赵尔冰, 等. 煤气管道穿孔泄漏原因分析及建议 [J]. 管道技术与设备, 2011(6): 47-48, 57.
YANG Yong, HE Renyang, ZHAO Erbing, et al. Causal analysis of urban gas pipeline corrosion leakage accidents and suggestions [J]. Pipeline Technology and Equipment, 2011(6): 47-48, 57.
李昭阳. 天然气管道入综合管廊的风险评价 [D]. 广州: 华南理工大学, 2018.
LU Hongfang, HUANG Kun, FU Lingdi, et al. Study on leakage and ventilation scheme of gas pipeline in tunnel [J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2018, 53: 347-358.
胡敏华. 共同沟天然气管道泄漏报警的模型实验 [J]. 天然气工业, 2006, 26(10): 150-153.
HU Minhua. Model experiment on the response of alarm detector to natural gas leakage in utility tunnel [J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2006, 26(10): 150-153.
胡敏华. 共同沟天然气管道泄漏报警实验研究 [J]. 深圳大学学报(理工版), 2006, 23(3): 211-216.
HU Minhua. Experimental study on response of alarm detector to natural gas leakage in utility tunnel [J]. Journal of Shenzhen University(Science and Engineering), 2006, 23(3): 211-216.
MELAINA M W, ANTONIA O, PENEV M. Blending hydrogen into natural gas pipeline networks: a review of key issues [EB/OL]. [2022-11-25]. https://trid.trb.org/view/1251623.
WOODWARD J L, MUDAN K S. Liquid and gas discharge rates through holes in process vessels [J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 1991, 4(3): 161-165.
DONG Yuhua, GAO Huilin, Zhou Jing'en, et al. Evaluation of gas release rate through holes in pipelines [J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2002, 15(6): 423-428.
LOWESMITH B J, HANKINSON G, JOHNSON D M. Vapour cloud explosions in a long congested region involving methane/hydrogen mixtures [J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2011, 89(4): 234-247.
0
浏览量
5
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621