水翼空化流场的调控和优化研究

赵伟; 刘真威; 陈石阳; 丁耀东; 李平

doi:10.7652/xjtuxb202305008

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

水翼空化流场的调控和优化研究

能源与动力 | 更新时间：2025-07-09

- 水翼空化流场的调控和优化研究
- Research on Control and Optimization of Hydrofoil Cavitation Flow Field
- 西安交通大学学报 2023年57卷第5期页码：78-88
- 作者机构：
  
  西安交通大学热流科学与工程教育部重点实验室,西安,710049
- 作者简介：
  
  : 2022-08-26。作者简介: 赵伟(1997—),男,硕士生
  李平(通信作者),男,副教授,博士生导师。基金项目: 国家自然科学基金资助项目(51976152)。
- 基金信息：
  
  : 2022-08-26。作者简介: 赵伟(1997—),男,硕士生;李平(通信作者),男,副教授,博士生导师。基金项目: 国家自然科学基金资助项目(51976152)。
- DOI：10.7652/xjtuxb202305008
  中图分类号： TK730
- 网络首发：2023-05-10，
  
  纸质出版：2023
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
赵伟, 刘真威, 陈石阳, 等. 水翼空化流场的调控和优化研究[J]. 西安交通大学学报, 2023,57(5):78-88.

ZHAO Wei, LIU Zhenwei, CHEN Shiyang, et al. Research on Control and Optimization of Hydrofoil Cavitation Flow Field[J]. 2023, 57(5): 78-88.
赵伟, 刘真威, 陈石阳, 等. 水翼空化流场的调控和优化研究[J]. 西安交通大学学报, 2023,57(5):78-88. DOI： 10.7652/xjtuxb202305008.

ZHAO Wei, LIU Zhenwei, CHEN Shiyang, et al. Research on Control and Optimization of Hydrofoil Cavitation Flow Field[J]. 2023, 57(5): 78-88. DOI： 10.7652/xjtuxb202305008.

摘要

为抑制水力机械中水翼绕流流场空化的形成和发展

通过对比分析NACA0009、NACA0012以及Clark Y 3种经典水翼不同攻角和空化数工况下的性能

获得型线优化思路

建立了新水翼。进一步地

在新水翼上布设多个流动控制结构

通过广义模式搜索算法进行快速优化设计

对空化流场进行整体控制和局部调控。研究结果表明:新水翼吸力面凸起高度介于NACA0012和Clark Y水翼之间

最大凸起高度位置后移; 新水翼的空化性能和水动力性能提升

升阻比最大提高48.8%

空泡脱落和回射流发展得到抑制; 在新水翼吸力面均匀布设的多个控制结构能够对回射流起到连续抑制作用

改善压力分布; 通过优化算法实现了控制结构设计的精准快速寻优

优化后的水翼性能得到了进一步提升

升阻比继续提高4.8%～13.6%

空化厚度与长度减小。型线优化和添加连续流动控制结构实现了空化流场的整体和局部控制

是提高水翼的空化和水动力性能的有效方法。

Abstract

In order to suppress the formation and development of cavitation in the flow field around the hydrofoil

this paper establishes a new hydrofoil with its profile optimized by comparing and analyzing the performance of three classical hydrofoils

NACA0009

NACA0012 and Clark Y under different working conditions. Then

several fluid control structures are uniformly arranged on the new hydrofoil

and optimized rapidly by generalized pattern search algorithm to realize general and local control of cavitation in the flow field. The results show that the new hydrofoil has a suction surface whose bulge height is between those of the NACA0012 and Clark hydrofoils

and its maximum bulge position is backward. The new hydrofoil shows improved cavitation performance(cavitation shedding suppressed)and hydrodynamic performance(backflow development suppressed)

with its lift-drag ratio up by as high as 48.8%. The multiple control structures evenly arranged on the suction surface of the new hydrofoil can continuously suppress the backflow and improve the pressure distribution. They are accurately and rapidly optimized with an optimization algorithm. As a result

the performance of the optimized hydrofoil is further improved

with the lift-drag ratio further up by 4.8%—13.6%

and the thickness and length of cavitation reduced. Therefore

optimizing the profile and adding continuous flow control structures can realize the overall and local control of the cavitation flow field

providing an effective way to improve the cavitation and hydrodynamic performance of the hydrofoil.

关键词

Keywords

references

KUBOTA A, KATO H, YAMAGUCHI H. A new modelling of cavitating flows: a numerical study of unsteady cavitation on a hydrofoil section [J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1992, 240: 59-96.

曹玉良, 明廷锋, 贺国, 等. 基于深度学习的离心泵空化状态识别 [J]. 西安交通大学学报, 2017, 51(11): 165-172.

CAO Yuliang, MING Tingfeng, HE Guo, et al. Cavitation state recognition of centrifugal pump based on deep learning [J]. Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University, 2017, 51(11): 165-172.

季斌, 程怀玉, 黄彪, 等. 空化水动力学非定常特性研究进展及展望 [J]. 力学进展, 2019, 49(1): 428-479.

JI Bin, CHENG Huaiyu, HUANG Biao, et al. Research progresses and prospects of unsteady hydrodynamics characteristics for cavitation [J]. Advances in Mechanics, 2019, 49(1): 428-479.

余本旭. 基于OpenFOAM的绕水翼空化流动与湍动能输运研究 [D]. 杭州: 浙江理工大学, 2018: 1-12.

常欣, 郭春雨, 孟祥印, 等. 基于粒子群算法的水翼剖面优化设计 [J]. 船舶工程, 2010, 32(5): 1-3, 26.

CHANG Xin, GUO Chunyu, MENG Xiangyin, et al. Design of hydrofoil section based on particle swarm optimization [J]. Ship Engineering, 2010, 32(5): 1-3, 26.

黄胜, 任万龙, 王超. 水翼剖面多目标粒子群算法优化 [J]. 哈尔滨工程大学学报, 2014, 35(12): 1451-1457.

HUANG Sheng, REN Wanlong, WANG Chao. Multi-objective particle swarm optimization of hydrofoil sections [J]. Journal of Harbin Engineering University, 2014, 35(12): 1451-1457.

黄斌, 熊鹰. 基于多目标粒子群算法的翼剖面优化设计 [J]. 船舶工程, 2016, 38(7): 10-14.

HUANG Bin, XIONG Ying. Optimizing design of hydrofoil section based on multi-objective particle swarm algorithm [J]. Ship Engineering, 2016, 38(7): 10-14.

李靖璐, 王鹏, 牛宏磊, 等. 自由变形在水翼外形优化设计中的应用 [J]. 哈尔滨工程大学学报, 2020, 41(9): 1249-1254.

LI Jinglu, WANG Peng, NIU Honglei, et al. Application of free-form deformation method in the shape Optimization design of hydrofoil [J]. Journal of Harbin Engineering University, 2020, 41(9): 1249-1254.

LUO Xingqi, ZHU Guojun, FENG Jianjun. Multi-point design optimization of hydrofoil for marine current turbine [J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2014, 26(5): 807-817.

KADIVAR E, OCHIAI T, IGA Y, et al. An experimental investigation of transient cavitation control on a hydrofoil using hemispherical vortex generators [J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2021, 33(6): 1139-1147.

顾巍, 何友声. 空泡流非稳态现象的流动控制 [J]. 力学学报, 2001, 33(1): 19-27.

GU Wei, HE Yousheng. Flow control on unstable cavitation phenomena [J]. Acta Mechanica Sinica, 2001, 33(1): 19-27.

QIU Ning, ZHOU Wenjie, CHE Bangxiang, et al. Effects of microvortex generators on cavitation erosion by changing periodic shedding into new structures [J]. Physics of Fluids, 2020, 32(10): 104108.

赵国寿, 伍锐, 车邦祥, 等. 基于障碍物的轴流泵叶片空化控制 [J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2021, 55(4): 742-749.

ZHAO Guoshou, WU Rui, CHE Bangxiang, et al. Blade cavitation control by obstacles in axial-flow pump [J]. Journal of Zhejiang University(Engineering Science), 2021, 55(4): 742-749.

ZHAO Guoshou, CAO Linlin, CHE Bangxiang, et al. Towards the control of blade cavitation in a waterjet pump with inlet guide vanes: passive control by obstacles [J]. Ocean Engineering, 2021, 231: 108820.

QIAN Zhongdong, ZHANG Shaofeng, XUE Longjian. Numerical study of mitigating cloud cavitation shedding using biomimetic protuberant stripes [J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2022, 144(9): 091201.

LIN Lin, CHEN Yangyang, ZHANG Xinxin, et al. Optimization of geometry and flow rate distribution for double-layer microchannel heat sink [J]. International Journal of Thermal Sciences, 2014, 78: 158-168.

MAZAHERI K, KIANI K C, NEJATI A, et al. Optimization and analysis of shock wave/boundary layer interaction for drag reduction by shock control bump [J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2015, 42: 196-208.

XUE Bing, WEI Chao, HU Jibin, et al. Research on effects of groove shape optimization on cavitation and lubricating characteristics for microgroove rotary seal [J]. Tribology Transactions, 2018, 61(3): 569-584.

SAUREL R, LEMETAYER O. A multiphase model for compressible flows with interfaces, shocks, detonation waves and cavitation [J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2001, 431: 239-271.

MENTER F R. Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications [J]. AIAA Journal, 1994, 32(8): 1598-1605.

DUCOIN A, HUANG Biao, YOUNG Y L. Numerical modeling of unsteady cavitating flows around a stationary hydrofoil [J]. International Journal of Rotating Machinery, 2012, 2012: 215678.

HUANG Biao, DUCOIN A, YOUNG Y L. Physical and numerical investigation of cavitating flows around a pitching hydrofoil [J]. Physics of Fluids, 2013, 25(10): 102109.

MORGUT M, NOBILE E, BILU I. Comparison of mass transfer models for the numerical prediction of sheet cavitation around a hydrofoil [J]. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 2011, 37(6): 620-626.

GENG Linlin, CHEN Jian, ESCALER X. Improvement of cavitation mass transfer modeling by including Rayleigh-Plesset equation second order term [J]. European Journal of Mechanics: B Fluids, 2020, 84: 313-324.

DUPONT P. Etude de la dynamique d'une poche de cavitation partielle en vue de la prédiction de l'érosion dans les turbomachines hydrauliques [D]. Lausanne: École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, 1993: 64-69.

HUANG Biao, WANG Guoyu. Experimental and numerical investigation of unsteady cavitating flows through a 2D hydrofoil [J]. Science China Technological Sciences, 2011, 54(7): 1801-1812.[27] 姜海波, 赵云鹏. 基于中弧线-厚度函数的翼型形状解析构造法 [J]. 图学学报, 2013, 34(1): 50-54.

JIANG Haibo, ZHAO Yunpeng. Analytic expression method of airfoil profile shape based on a mean camber and thickness function [J]. Journal of Graphics, 2013, 34(1): 50-54.

CHE Bangxiang, CAO Linlin, CHU Ning, et al. Effect of obstacle position on attached cavitation control through response surface methodology [J]. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 2019, 33(9): 4265-4279.

陈明. 障碍物抑制平板水翼云空化研究 [D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2018: 65-103.

KADIVAR E, MOCTAR O E, JAVADI K. Stabilization of cloud cavitation instabilities using Cylindrical Cavitating-bubble Generators(CCGs)[J]. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 2019, 115: 108-125.

浏览量

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

喷孔直径对高压喷射喷嘴内甲醇流动及喷雾瞬态特性影响的可视化试验研究

喷嘴内流影响下的喷油器性能参数敏感性分析

喷孔长度对空化流动及空蚀特性影响研究

喷孔直径对高压喷射喷嘴内甲醇流动及喷雾瞬态特性影响的可视化试验研究

基于小世界原理的模型降阶优化研究