西安交通大学叶轮机械研究所,西安,710049
李军(通信作者),男,教授,博士生导师。基金项目: 国家自然科学基金资助项目(51936008)
网络首发:2022-03-10,
纸质出版:2022
移动端阅览
薛文松, 方志, 王天昊, 等. 防旋板结构的迷宫密封转子动力特性研究[J]. 西安交通大学学报, 2022,56(3):105-116.
Investigation on the Rotordynamic Characteristics of Labyrinth Seal with Swirl Brakes[J]. 2022, 56(3): 105-116.
薛文松, 方志, 王天昊, 等. 防旋板结构的迷宫密封转子动力特性研究[J]. 西安交通大学学报, 2022,56(3):105-116. DOI: 10.7652/xjtuxb202203011.
Investigation on the Rotordynamic Characteristics of Labyrinth Seal with Swirl Brakes[J]. 2022, 56(3): 105-116. DOI: 10.7652/xjtuxb202203011.
采用基于转子多频椭圆涡动模型和动网格技术求解非定常RANS方程
研究了高低两种预旋比下具有防旋板结构的迷宫密封气流激振转子动力特性。分析对比了在预旋比分别为0.13和1.32时无防旋板结构迷宫密封(Design 1)、带进口防旋板结构迷宫密封(Design 2)、在Design 2的基础上增加二级防旋板迷宫密封(Design 3)的平均周向速度、泄漏量、转子动力特性系数。数值模拟得到的Design 1的泄漏量和转子动力特性系数与实验数据吻合良好
验证了数值方法的准确性。研究表明:高预旋比会导致Design 1的直接刚度和有效阻尼降低
并使直接阻尼与交叉刚度增加; 预旋比为1.32时Design 2相对于Design 1能明显降低交叉刚度
且降幅达到63.3%~86.3%
Design 3相对于Design 2的交叉刚度降低了12.9%~39.4%; 预旋比0.13时Design 2的交叉刚度小于0
Design 3的交叉刚度绝对值相对于Design 2增加了24.4%~153.0%; Design 2相对于Design 1在预旋比为1.32时有效阻尼项穿越频率从175.1 Hz降低到28.3 Hz
预旋比为0.13时在20 Hz之后的有效阻尼增加31.6%~60.0%; Design 3相对于Design 2在预旋比为1.32时消除了有效阻尼的穿越频率
在预旋比为0.13时有效阻尼增加26.9%~38.0%。在两种预旋比下设计二级防旋板会略微降低直接刚度
减小交叉刚度
增加直接阻尼。本文工作可为增加迷宫密封转子动力特性的防旋板设计提供参考。
The airflow excited rotordynamic characteristics of labyrinth seal with swirl brakes at two different inlet preswirl ratios were numerically investigated by solving the unsteady Reynolds-average Navier-Stokes equation based on the multi-frequency elliptical orbit rotor whirling mode and dynamic mesh technique. The average circumferential velocity
leakage flow rate and rotordynamic coefficients of labyrinth seal with inlet swirl brake(Design 2)or double swirl brakes(Design 3)
or without swirl brake(Design 1)
were analyzed at two different inlet preswirl ratios of 0.13 or 1.32. The numerically predicted leakage flow rate and rotordynamic coefficient of experimental labyrinth seal without swirl brake(Design 1)agreed very well with the experimental data
so the accuracy of the used numerical method was validated. The obtained results show that the direct stiffness and the effective damping ofDesign 1 decrease' and the direct damping and cross-coupling stiffness increase' at higher inlet preswirls. The cross-coupling stiffness ofDesign 2 decreases by 63.3%-86.3% compared withDesign 1 at the inlet preswirl ratio of 1.32. The cross-coupling stiffness ofDesign 3 decreases by 12.9%-39.4% compared withDesign 2 at the inlet preswirl ratio of 1.32. The cross-coupling stiffness ofDesign 2 is less than zero at the inlet preswirl ratio of 0.13. The magnitude of negative cross-coupling stiffness ofDesign 3 increases by 24.4%-153.0% compared toDesign 2 at the inlet preswirl ratio of 0.13.Design 2 reduces the crossover frequency of effective damping from 175.1 Hz to 28.3 Hz compared withDesign 1 when the inlet preswirl ratio is 1.32.Design 2 adds 31.5%-60.0% to the effective damping after 20 Hz compared withDesign 1 when the inlet preswirl ratio is 0.13.Design 3 eliminates the crossover frequency of effective damping compared withDesign 2 when the inlet preswirl ratio is 1.32.Design 3 adds 26.9%-38.0% to the effective damping after 20 Hz compared withDesign 1 when the inlet preswirl ratio is 0.13. Adding double swirl brakes inDesign 3 would slightly reduce the direct stiffness and cross-coupling stiffness and increase the direct damping compared withDesign 2 at different inlet preswirl ratio. This research can provide a reference for the swirl brake design to improve rotordynamic characteristics of labyrinth seals.
ZHANG Xuan, JIANG Jinbo, PENG Xudong, et al. Leakage and rotordynamic characteristics of labyrinth seal and hole-pattern damping seal with special-shaped 3D cavity [J]. Industrial Lubrication and Tribology, 2021, 73(2): 396-403.
LI Zhigang, LI Jun, FENG Zhenping. Numerical comparison of rotordynamic characteristics for a fully partitioned pocket damper seal and a labyrinth seal with high positive and negative inlet preswirl [J]. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 2016, 138(4): 042505.
李军, 晏鑫, 丰镇平, 等. 透平机械阻尼密封技术及其转子动力特性研究进展 [J]. 热力透平, 2009, 38(1): 5-9, 14.
LI Jun, YAN Xin, FENG Zhenping, et al. State-of-the art of turbomachinery damper seals technology and their rotordynamic characteristics [J]. Thermal Turbine, 2009, 38(1): 5-9, 14.
NIELSEN K K, CHILDS D W, MYLLERUP C M. Experimental and theoretical comparison of two swirl brake designs [J]. Journal of Turbomachinery, 2001, 123(2): 353-358.
VANCE J, MURPHY B, ZEIDAN F. Machinery vibration and rotordynamics [M]. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley, 2010: 271-272.
LI Zhigang, LI Jun, FENG Zhenping. Labyrinth seal rotordynamic characteristics: part ii geometrical parameter effects [J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2016, 32(5): 1281-1291.
LI Zhigang, LI Jun, FENG Zhenping. Labyrinth seal rotordynamic characteristics: part i operational conditions effects [J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2016, 32(5): 1199-1211.
CHILDS D W, VANCE J M. Annular seals as tools to control rotordynamic response of future gas turbine engines [C]∥30th Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit. Reston, VA, USA: AIAA, 1994: 1-9.
KIM N, PARK S Y, RHODE D L. Predicted effects of shunt injection on the rotordynamics of gas labyrinth seals [J]. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 2003, 125(1): 167-174.
BENCKERT H, WACHTER J. Flow induced spring coefficients of labyrinth seals for application in rotor dynamics [EB/OL].(1980-01-01)[2021-06-10]. https: ∥ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19800021216.
CHILDS D W, MCLEAN J E Jr, ZHANG Min, et al. Rotordynamic performance of a negative-swirl brake for a tooth-on-stator labyrinth seal [J]. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 2016, 138(6): 062505.
XU Wanjun, YANG Jiangang. A study on rotordynamic characteristics of swirl brakes for three types of seals [J]. Materials Science and Engineering, 2017, 187(1): 012022.
CHEN Yaoxing, LI Zhigang, LI Jun, et al. Effects of swirl brake axial arrangement on the leakage performance and rotor stability of labyrinth seals [J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2021, 34(1): 22-31.
冀大伟, 李军, 宁宵. 防旋板对迷宫密封转子动力特性影响的研究 [J]. 热力透平, 2017, 46(3): 164-168, 189.
JI Dawei, LI Jun, NING Xiao. Investigations on the effect of inlet swirl brake structure on the rotor dynamic coefficients of labyrinth seal [J]. Thermal Turbine, 2017, 46(3): 164-168, 189.
SOGHE R D, MICIO M, ANDREINI A, et al. Numerical characterization of swirl brakes for high pressure centrifugal compressors [C]∥ASME Turbo Expo 2013: Turbine Technical Conference and Exposition. New York, USA: ASME, 2013: V06CT40A001.
IWATSUBO T, IWASAKI Y. Experimental and theoretical study on swirl braked labyrrinth seal [J]. Journal of System Design and Dynamics, 2008, 2(1): 451-462.
SUN Dan, WANG Shuang, XIAO Zhonghui, et al. Measurement versus predictions of rotordynamic coefficients of seal with swirl brakes [J]. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 2015, 94: 188-199.
SUN Dan, WANG Shuang, FEI Chengwei, et al. Numerical and experimental investigation on the effect of swirl brakes on the labyrinth seals [J]. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 2016, 138(3): 032507.
UNTAROIU A, JIN Hanxiang, FU Gen, et al. The effects of fluid preswirl and swirl brakes design on the performance of labyrinth seals [J]. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 2018, 140(8): 082503.
0
浏览量
4
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621