西安交通大学机械制造系统工程国家重点实验室,西安,710049
网络首发:2021-10-10,
纸质出版:2021
移动端阅览
栗世豪, 张俊, 唐宇阳, 等. 零件加工误差与机床几何误差映射关系建模[J]. 西安交通大学学报, 2021,55(10):50-59.
Modeling of Mapping Relationship Between Machining Error and Geometric Error of Machine Tool[J]. 2021, 55(10): 50-59.
栗世豪, 张俊, 唐宇阳, 等. 零件加工误差与机床几何误差映射关系建模[J]. 西安交通大学学报, 2021,55(10):50-59. DOI: 10.7652/xjtuxb202110006.
Modeling of Mapping Relationship Between Machining Error and Geometric Error of Machine Tool[J]. 2021, 55(10): 50-59. DOI: 10.7652/xjtuxb202110006.
针对机床几何误差与零件误差映射关系建模方法并未考虑刀具在加工过程中各个点位的位置偏差与姿态偏差的问题
以三轴机床为研究对象
首先利用多体系统运动学理论
建立机床刀尖点误差与刀轴矢量误差模型。然后利用单基站激光跟踪仪多次测量的方法
结合误差分离算法
辨识得到了机床的21项几何误差项
并对18项与位置有关的误差项进行拟合
构建了完整的典型三轴机床工作空间误差场。最后以凸台宽度、平面度、孔轴线位置度等典型特征
结合加工轨迹
建立起机床几何误差与尺寸误差、形状误差和位置误差的映射关系
并进行了相应的实验验证。实验结果表明:凸台宽度误差与机床刀尖点在该处的几何误差有关
11个点位的凸台宽度误差测量值与计算值相差在5 μm以内; “之”字型铣削平面度误差分析要先进行刀具轨迹离散化
然后将刀具圆周离散化
计算刀具圆周含有误差的点
通过点位筛选原则
选择真正属于加工表面的点
对这些点利用最小二乘法计算平面度
平面度误差计算值与测量值相差2 μm以内; 孔轴线位置度误差分析要考虑钻孔过程中不同位置处刀尖点误差与刀轴姿态误差
以二者为基础构建孔轴线方程
通过代入检测平面的高度以获取相应高度处圆心偏差
孔轴线位置度误差计算值与测量值相差5 μm以内。
At present
the modeling method of geometric error and the accuracy of parts does not consider tool's position deviation and gesture deviation in machining. In order to establish a mapping relationship between geometric error and part error that conforms with machining process and realize the prediction of the part machining error a three-axis machine tool is used as the research object. Firstly
the model of tool position error and tool axis vector error of machine tool are established by using the theory of multi-body system dynamics. Then
the geometric error data of machine tool are identified by using laser tracker and 21 errors of machine tool are obtained
and 18 errors related to position are fitted to build an error space of machine tool. Finally
the typical part features such as part width
flatness
and hole axis position error are selected combined with the moving path of the cutter in machining
and the model between the machine tool geometric error and the part features is established. The accuracy of the model is verified by experiments. The experimental results show that part width error is related to the geometric error of the tool tip
and the differences between measured value and calculated value of part width at 11 points are within 5 μm; the zigzag milling flatness error analysis needs to discretize the tool path firstly
then discretize the tool circle and calculate the point error of the tool circle
finally select the points that belong to the machining face and calculate the flatness error by using the least square method with those points
and the difference between the measured value and calculated value of flatness error is within 2 μm; the position error of hole axis analysis needs to consider the tool tip error and the tool axis error at different positions during the drilling process
then establish the hole equation with those two
and finally obtain the error of the center of circle in corresponding plane by substituting the height value of the measurement plane into the equation. The difference between measured value and calculated value of the position error of hole axis is within 5 μm.
粟时平. 多轴数控机床精度建模与误差补偿方法研究 [D]. 长沙: 中国人民解放军国防科学技术大学, 2002: 35-62.
YANG J, ALTINTAS Y. Generalized kinematics of five-axis serial machines with non-singular tool path generation [J]. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 2013, 75: 119-132.
付国强. 基于指数积理论和坐标系微分运动关系的数控机床几何误差建模与补偿方法研究 [D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2016: 45-78.
李海. 多轴联动数控加工精度预测与机床参数优化 [D]. 南京: 南京航空航天大学, 2018: 10-27.
朱绍维. 复杂零件五轴铣削加工精度预测与补偿技术研究 [D]. 成都: 西南交通大学, 2013: 77-88.
NOJEDEH M V, HABIBI M, AREZOO B. Tool path accuracy enhancement through geometrical error compensation [J]. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 2011, 51(6): 471-482.
TIAN W, GAO W, ZHANG D, et al. A general approach for error modeling of machine tools [J]. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 2014, 79(4): 17-23.
ZHU S W, DING G F, QIN S F, et al. Integrated geometric error modeling, identification and compensation of CNC machine tools [J]. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 2012, 52(1): 24-29.
FAN J W, GUAN J L, WANG W C, et al. A universal modeling method for enhancement the volumetric accuracy of CNC machine tools [J]. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2002, 129(1/2/3): 624-628.
LIN Y, SHEN Y. Modelling of five-axis machine tool metrology models using the matrix summation approach [J]. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2003, 21(4): 243-248.
HUANG Y B, FAN K C, LOU Z F, et al. A novel modeling of volumetric errors of three-axis machine tools based on Abbe and Bryan principles [J]. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 2020, 151: 1027-1035.
RAMESH R, MANNAN M A, POO A N. Error compensation in machine tools: a review: part I Geometric, cutting-force induced and fixture-dependent errors [J]. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 2000, 40(9): 1235-1256.
HSU Y Y, WANG S S. A new compensation method for geometry errors of five-axis machine tools [J]. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 2007, 47(2): 352-360.
HUANG Nuodi, JIN Yongqiao, BI Qingzhen, et al. Integrated post-processor for 5-axis machine tools with geometric errors compensation [J]. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 2015, 94: 65-73.
RAHMAN M, HEIKKALA J, LAPPALAINEN K. Modeling, measurement and error compensation of multi-axis machine tools: part I Theory [J]. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 2000, 40(10): 1535-1546.
LIU Y, WAN M, XIAO Q B, et al. Identification and compensation of geometric errors of rotary axes in five-axis machine tools through constructing equivalent rotary axis(ERA)[J]. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 2019, 152: 211-227.
李欢玲. 基于多体理论的数控机床几何误差补偿技术的研究 [D]. 南京: 南京航空航天大学, 2009: 29-74.
XIA C, WANG S, MA C, et al. Crucial geometric error compensation towards gear grinding accuracy Enhancement based on simplified actual inverse kinematic model [J]. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 2019: 105319.
粟时平, 李圣怡, 王贵林. 基于空间误差模型的加工中心几何误差辨识方法 [J]. 机械工程学报, 2002, 38(7): 121-125.
SU Shiping, LI Shengyi, WANG Guilin. Identification method for errors of machining center based on volumetric error model [J]. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2002, 38(7): 121-125.
陈思敏. 基于十二线法的数控机床几何误差测量方法与实验研究 [D]. 武汉: 华中科技大学, 2016: 27-34.
王金栋, 郭俊杰, 费致根, 等. 基于激光跟踪仪的数控机床几何误差辨识方法 [J]. 机械工程学报, 2011, 47(14): 13-19.
WANG Jindong, GUO Junjie, FEI Zhigen. Method of geometric error identification for numerical control machine tool based on laser tracker [J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2011, 47(14): 13-19.
刘又午. 多体动力学的休斯敦方法及其发展 [J]. 中国机械工程, 2000, 11(6): 601-607.
LIU Youwu. Development of Huston's method on multibody dynamics [J]. China Mechanical Engineering, 2000, 11(6): 601-607.
吕盾,刘硕,赵艳超,等.具有串联轴伺服进给系统的跟随误差控制策略.2021,55(5):34-44.doi:10.7652/xjtuxb2021 05005.
郭俊康,李鑫波,李勰.导轨五自由度运动误差的光学与倾角传感器组合测量方法.2021,55(2):64-72.doi:10.7652/xjtuxb202102008.
王仕璞,宋朝省,朱才朝,等.正前角双圆弧谐波传动柔轮滚刀设计与齿形误差分析.2021,55(1):127-135.doi:10.7652/xjtuxb202101016
刘玄,方宗德,赵宁,等.高重合度斜齿轮多齿对啮合的补偿修形设计与分析.2020,54(11):56-64.doi:10.7652/xjtuxb 202011007.
贾谦,王建磊,崔展,等.引入螺旋槽制造误差的机械密封性能分析及优化.2020,54(11):46-55.doi:10.7652/xjtuxb 202011006.
吕盾,刘青,刘沛,等.五轴机床加工零件轮廓误差预测方法.2020,54(2):9-15.doi:10.7652/xjtuxb202002002.
徐明宇,李亚倩,陈渭.考虑孔加工锥度误差影响的液态金属润滑螺旋槽轴承性能分析.2020,54(1):85-92.doi:10.7652/xjtuxb202001011.
何帅,陈富民,杨雅棠,等.基于点云数据的自由曲面加工误差评定.2019,53(10):135-142.doi:10.7652/xjtuxb2019 10019.
朱星星,赵亮,雷默涵,等.精密进给系统热误差的协同训练支持向量机回归建模与补偿方法.2019,53(10):40-47.doi:10.7652/xjtuxb201910006.
吕盾,李润泽,刘辉,等.数控机床高速高加速进给下的跟随误差控制策略.2018,52(12):25-31.doi:10.7652/xjtuxb 201812004.
0
浏览量
6
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621