煤粉燃烧过程中H<sub>2</sub>S生成详细机理研究

吕嗣晨 1; 王川保 2; 赵军 3; 马红和 1

doi:10.7652/xjtuxb202004009

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

煤粉燃烧过程中H₂S生成详细机理研究

更新时间：2025-07-09

- 煤粉燃烧过程中H₂S生成详细机理研究
- A Study on Detailed Mechanism of H₂S Formation During Pulveri-ed Coal Combustion
- 西安交通大学学报 2020年54卷第4期页码：68-75
- 作者机构：
  
  太原理工大学电气与动力工程学院,太原,030024
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  : 2019-09-29。作者简介: 吕嗣晨(1996-),男,硕士生;马红和(通信作者),男,副教授。基金项目: 国家自然科学基金资助项目(51706151)
- DOI：10.7652/xjtuxb202004009
  中图分类号： TK224.1
- 网络首发：2020-04-10，
  
  纸质出版：2020
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
吕嗣晨 1, 王川保 2, 赵军 3, 等. 煤粉燃烧过程中H₂S生成详细机理研究[J]. 西安交通大学学报, 2020,54(4):68-75. DOI: 10.7652/xjtuxb202004009.

A Study on Detailed Mechanism of H₂S Formation During Pulveri-ed Coal Combustion[J]. 2020, 54(4): 68-75. DOI: 10.7652/xjtuxb202004009.
吕嗣晨 1, 王川保 2, 赵军 3, 等. 煤粉燃烧过程中H₂S生成详细机理研究[J]. 西安交通大学学报, 2020,54(4):68-75. DOI: 10.7652/xjtuxb202004009. DOI：

A Study on Detailed Mechanism of H₂S Formation During Pulveri-ed Coal Combustion[J]. 2020, 54(4): 68-75. DOI: 10.7652/xjtuxb202004009. DOI：

摘要

为从自由基层面揭示煤粉燃烧过程中H

S的生成机理

构建了由34个组分和115个基元反应构成的详细反应机理模型

并采用数值模拟和实验研究相结合的方法

验证了模型的可靠性

同时进行了主要含硫组分和重要自由基的生成速率分析以及H

S生成的敏感性分析。组分浓度分布的预测值与实验值的对比结果表明:CO

、CO、H

、H

S、SO

和COS的误差均小于5%

最大误差为25%

模型具有较高的可信度。生成速率分析显示:H

S主要通过基元反应H

S+HSH+H

、CS

OH

S+COS和COS+H

OH

S+CO

生成; SO

先被CO和H还原为SO、HOSO等

再转化为S、SH

并最终还原为H

S; CS

、COS也是H

S生成的重要来源

SH是H

S生成的关键自由基。敏感性分析说明:基元反应HOSO(+M)H+SO

(+M)、SO

+COSO+CO

、CS

OH

S+COS和COS+H

OH

S+CO

对H

S的浓度表现出较高的敏感性

较高的温度(>1 500 K)能够促进SO

、COS、CS

向H

S转化。该结果可为煤粉锅炉中高温腐蚀的预测提供理论依据。

Abstract

A detailed reaction mechanism model involving 34 species and 115 elementary reactions is developed to reveal the reaction mechanism of H

S formation during coal combustion from the level of free radical. Furthermore

numeric

al simulation and experimental methods are applied to verify the credibility of the model and to analy-e the rate-of-production(ROP)of main sulfur species and important free radicals

and the sensitivity of H

S formation. A comparison between the experimental and the predicated results shows that the errors of CO

and COS are all within 5%

and that the maximum error of CS

is 25%. Therefore

the model has a high reliability. Rate-of-production(ROP)analysis indicates that H

S is mainly generated via elementary reactions ofH

S+H-SH+H

O-H

S+COS

andCOS+H

O-H

S+CO

.SO

关键词

Keywords

references

LIU Yacheng, FAN Weidong, WU Mingzhou. Experimental and numerical studies on the gas velocity deviation in a 600 MWe tangentially fired boiler [J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2017, 110: 553-563.

高明. 低氮燃烧及烟气脱硝国内外研究现状 [J]. 广州化工, 2012(17): 18-19, 22.

GAO Ming. Low nitrogen combustion and flue gas denitration research situation [J]. Guangzhou Chemical Industry, 2012(17): 18-19, 22.

FRIGGE L, STRÖHLE J, EPPLE B. Release of sulfur and chlorine gas species during coal combustion and pyrolysis in an entrained flow reactor [J]. Fuel, 2017, 201: 105-110.

马红和, 周璐, 马素霞, 等. 煤粉燃烧过程中H2S生成机理研究进展 [J]. 热力发电, 2019, 48(1): 1-5.

MA Honghe, ZHOU Lu, MA Suxia, et al. Progress in mechanism of H2S formation during pulverized coal combustion [J]. Thermal Power Generation, 2019, 48(1): 1-5.

ZHANG Dongke, YANI S. Sulphur transformation during pyrolysis of an Australian lignite [J]. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2011, 33(2): 1747-1753.

KUNG C. High-temperature corrosion mechanisms for selected iron and nickel-based alloys exposed to sulfur and chlorine-containing environments [J]. Corrosion, 2015, 71(4): 483-501.

SHIRAI H, IKEDA M, ARAMAKI H. Characteristics of hydrogen sulfide formation in pulverized coal combustion [J]. Fuel, 2013, 114: 114-119.

MULLER M, SCHNELL U, SCHEFFKNECHT G. Modeling the fate of sulfur during pulverized coal combustion under conventional and oxy-fuel conditions [J]. Energy Procedia, 2013, 37: 1377-1388.

Leeds University. Sulfur mechanism extension to the Leeds methane mechanism [EB/OL]. [2019-09-29]. http:∥www.chem.leeds.ac.uk/combustion /mechanisms/leedssox50.dat.

魏小林, 韩小海, SCHNELL U, 等. 煤粉燃烧中NOx和SOx生成的详细反应机理模拟 [J]. 力学学报, 2008, 40(6): 760-768.

WEI Xiaolin, HAN Xiaohai, SCHNELL U, et al. Modelling of the NOx and SOx formation in pulverized coal combustion with detailed reaction mechanism [J]. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2008, 40(6): 760-768.

郭啸峰, 魏小林, 李森. C/H/O/N/S/Cl/K/Na元素的详细反应机理的简化与验证 [J]. 燃烧科学与技术, 2013, 19(1): 21-30.

GUO Xiaofeng, WEI Xiaolin, LI Sen. Reduction and verification of detailed reaction mechanism containing C/H/O/N/S/Cl/K/Na elements [J]. Journal of Combustion Science and Technology, 2013, 19(1): 21-30.

CERRU F G, KRONENBURG A, LINDSTEDT R P. Systematically reduced chemical mechanisms for sulfur oxidation and pyrolysis [J]. Combustion and Flame, 2006, 146(3): 437-455.

ZHOU C, SENDT K, HAYNES B S. Experimental and kinetic modeling study of H2S oxidation [J]. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2013, 34(1): 625-632.

ABIáN M, CEBRIáN M, áNGELA M, et al. CS2 and COS conversion under different combustion conditions [J]. Combustion and Flame, 2015, 162(5): 2119-2127.

MA Honghe, ZHOU Lu, MA Suxia, et al. Reaction mechanism for sulfur species during pulverized coal combustion [J]. Energy Fuels, 2018, 32(3): 3958966.

SMITH G P, DAVID M. GRI-Mech 3.0 [EB/OL]. [2019-09-29]. http:∥www.me.berkeley.edu/gri_me ch/.

KEE R J, RUPLEY F M, MILLER J A, et al. CHENKIN Release 4.1, Reaction Design [CP]. San Diego, CA, USA: ANSYS, 2006: 195-285.

STRÖHLE J, CHEN X, ZORBACH I, et al. Validation of a detailed reaction mechanism for sulfur species in coal combustion [J]. Combustion Science Technology, 2014, 186(4/5): 540-551.

RASMUSSEN C L, GLARBORG P, MARSHALL P. Mechanisms of radical removal by SO2 [J]. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2007, 31(1): 339-347.

GIMéNEZ-LPEZ J, MARTINEZ M, MILLERA A, et al. SO2 effects on CO oxidation in a CO2 atmosphere, characteristic of oxy-fuel conditions [J]. Combustion and Flame, 2011, 158(1): 48-56.

SELIM H, IBRAHIM S, SHOAIBI A, et al. Investigation of sulfur chemistry with acid gas addition in hydrogen/air flames [J]. Applied Energy, 2014, 113: 1134-1140.

罗坤,李耀庭,黄勇成,等.生物油/生物柴油萃取液的燃料物性及发动机燃烧排放特性.2019,53(11):34-41.[doi:10.7652/xjtuxb201911005]

张向宇,杨玉,白文刚,等.准东煤旋风燃烧的数值模拟.2019,53(11):112-117.[doi:10.7652/xjtuxb201911016]

胡怀中,张建博,刘汉青,等.采用卷积神经网络的电站锅炉燃烧效率建模方法.2019,53(10):10-15.[doi:10.7652/xjtuxb201910002]

杨启容,邹瀚森,魏鑫,等.天然橡胶热解产物反应机理研究.2019,53(1):114-121.[doi:10.7652/xjtuxb201901015]

要雅姝,温渡,周屈兰,等.高温水蒸气氛围中煤燃烧特性研究.2018,52(12):84-92.[doi:10.7652/xjtuxb201812013]

汪映,白元启,王鹏,等.高辛烷值组分对正庚烷着火燃烧特性的影响.2018,52(11):30-36,80.[10.7652/xjtuxb2018 11005]

张烨苗,李倩倩,闫治宇,等.异辛烷掺混乙醇在高温下层流预混燃烧特性的研究.2018,52(7):74-79,100.[doi:10.7652/xjtuxb201807011]

马志豪,贾义,李智博,等.单滴燃料高压着火与燃烧特性的试验研究.2017,51(5):95-101,155.[doi:10.7652/xjtuxb 201705014]

李耀庭,黄勇成,孟凡胜,等.增压直喷汽油机中润滑油液滴诱发早燃机制的数值研究.2016,50(7):51-57.[doi:10.7652/xjtuxb201607009]

杨诏,李祥晟.高压环境下高炉煤气化学反应机理敏感性分析及机理简化.2015,49(11):39-43.[doi:10.7652/xjtuxb 201511007]

浏览量

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

多孔壁风耦合空气分级条件下煤粉燃烧的数值模拟

三塔合一间接空冷系统结构参数对夏季运行特性的影响研究

结构-语义-残差协同的图像压缩框架：面向隐私保护与高保真重建

张角凹坑气膜孔对双层壁气膜冷却特性的影响

混合电解槽阵列协同的风光耦合制氢系统双层多目标优化

煤粉燃烧过程中H2S生成详细机理研究

A Study on Detailed Mechanism of H2S Formation During Pulveri-ed Coal Combustion

DOI：10.7652/xjtuxb202004009

摘要

Abstract

关键词

Keywords

references

煤粉燃烧过程中H₂S生成详细机理研究

A Study on Detailed Mechanism of H₂S Formation During Pulveri-ed Coal Combustion