三峡大学湖北省水电机械设备设计与维护重点实验室,湖北,宜昌,443002
网络首发:2018-10-10,
纸质出版:2018
移动端阅览
陈保家, 邱光银, 肖文荣, 等. 航空发动机转子轴承运行可靠性评估方法[J]. 西安交通大学学报, 2018,52(10):41-48.
An Evaluation Method of Operational Reliability for Aero-Engine Rotor Bearings[J]. 2018, 52(10): 41-48.
陈保家, 邱光银, 肖文荣, 等. 航空发动机转子轴承运行可靠性评估方法[J]. 西安交通大学学报, 2018,52(10):41-48. DOI: 10.7652/xjtuxb201810006.
An Evaluation Method of Operational Reliability for Aero-Engine Rotor Bearings[J]. 2018, 52(10): 41-48. DOI: 10.7652/xjtuxb201810006.
为了提高少失效或零失效数据条件下的航空发动机轴承运行可靠性评估精度和可信性
提出了一种基于比例协变量模型(PCM)和Logistic回归模型(LRM)混合的可靠性评估方法。首先对轴承运行过程中的监测数据进行信号分析
提取状态特征指标
结合失效阈值确定设备状态
利用LRM先求解轴承的初始可靠性
进一步求解出轴承的初始故障率和基本协变量函数; 然后与PCM相结合
通过响应协变量和基本协变量函数对系统故障率函数进行不断更新
动态揭示状态监测数据与可靠性的映射关系; 最后利用更新后的故障率函数对航空发动机轴承进行运行可靠性评估。试验结果表明:该方法不需要人为确定基本协变量函数
避免了主观选择差异带入的估计偏差
所确定的寿命误差在5%以内
为少失效或无失效条件下的运行可靠性评估提供了一种新的手段。
A new reliability assessment method is proposed to improve the precision and credibility of reliability evaluation for aero-engine rotor bearings under the circumstances of less failure or zero failure data
and the method bases on a hybrid model of proportional covariate model(PCM)and Logistic regression model(LRM). The salient features reflecting equipment degradation process are extracted and selected from existing monitoring data by signal processing technology. These features are used as input of the LRM
and the equipment state data defined by the failure threshold are taken as output of the LRM. The initial reliability is estimated by LRM
and then the system hazard rate function is updated based on the response variables and the basic association variable function through combining with PCM. The mapping relationship between the monitoring data and the bearing reliability is dynamically revealed. Finally
the operational reliability of the aircraft engine bearings is successfully estimated using the updated hazard rate function. Case studies show that the method passes the process of the proportional factor decision between covariate and hazard rate
and avoids the influence coming from the subjective deviation. Its determined life error lies within 5%. It provides a new method for reliability estimation under sparse or zero failure data conditions.
王华伟, 高军, 吴海桥. 基于竞争失效的航空发动机剩余寿命预测 [J]. 机械工程学报, 2014, 50(6): 197-205.
WANG Huawei, GAO Jun, WU Haiqiao. Residual remaining life prediction based on competing failures for aircraft engines [J]. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2014, 50(6): 197-205.
黄粤, 韦桂兰, 张有铿, 等. CFM56-3发动机3号轴承后油气封严装置分离故障的监控方法 [J]. 航空动力学报, 2003, 18(5): 681-685.
HUANG Yue, WEI Guilan, ZHANG Youkeng, et al. A new method for controlling CFM56-3 No.3 aft air/oil seals separation [J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2003, 18(5): 681-685.
刘长福, 邓明. 航空发动机结构分析 [M]. 西安: 西北工业大学出版社, 2010: 364-399.
苗学问. 航空发动机主轴承使用寿命预测技术研究 [D]. 北京: 北京航空航天大学, 2009: 1-2.
O'CONNOR P D T. Reliability: past, present and future [J]. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 2000, 49(4): 335-341.
ZIO E. Reliability engineering: old problems and new challenges [J]. Reliability Engineering System Safety, 2009, 94(2): 125-141.
何正嘉, 曹宏瑞, 訾艳阳, 等. 机械设备运行可靠性评估的发展与思考 [J]. 机械工程学报, 2014, 50(2): 171-186.
HE Zhengjia, CAO Hongrui, ZI Yanyang, et al. Developments and thoughts on operational reliability assessment of mechanical equipment [J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2014, 50(2): 171-186.
何正嘉, 蔡改改, 申中杰, 等. 基于机械诊断信息的设备运行可靠性研究 [J]. 中国工程科学, 2013, 15(1): 9-14.
HE Zhengjia, CAI Gaigail, SHEN Zhongjie, et al. Study of operation reliability based on diagnosis information for mechanical equipment [J]. Engineering Sciences, 2013, 15(1): 9-14.
孙闯, 何正嘉, 张周锁, 等. 基于状态信息的航空发动机运行可靠性评估 [J]. 机械工程学报, 2013, 49(6): 30-37.
SUN Chuang, HE ZhengJia, ZHANG Zhousuo, et al. Operating reliability assessment for aero-engine based on condition monitoring information [J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2013, 49(6): 30-37.
COX D R. Regression models and life-tables [J]. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 1992, 34(2): 187-220.
DING F, HE Z. Cutting tool wear monitoring for reliability analysis using proportional hazards model [J]. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2011, 57(5/6/7/8): 565-574.
SUN Y, MA L, MATHEW J, et al. Mechanical systems hazard estimation using condition monitoring [J]. Mechanical Systems Signal Processing, 2006, 20(5): 1189-1201.
LIN D, WISEMAN M. Discussion of “mechanical systems hazard estimation using condition monitoring” [J]. Mechanical Systems Signal Processing, 2007, 21(7): 2947-2949.
CHEN B, CHEN X, LI B, et al. Reliability estimation for cutting tools based on logistic regression model using vibration signals [J]. Noise Vibration Bulletin, 2011, 25(7): 2526-2537.
MONTGOMERY D C. Introduction to linear regression analysis, fifth edition set [J]. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 2013, 170(3): 856-857.
CAI G, CHEN X, BING L, et al. Operation reliability assessment for cutting tools by applying a proportional covariate model to condition monitoring information [J]. Sensors, 2012, 12(10): 12964-12987.
LEE J, QIU H, YU G, et al. Bearing data set: NASA Ames prognostics data repository [EB/OL]. [2017-08-20]. https:∥ti.arc.nasa.gov/tech/dash/groups/pcoe/prognostic-data-repository/.
XIANG Jiawei, ZHONG Yongteng, GAO Haifeng. Rolling element bearing fault detection using PPCA and spectral kurtosis [J]. Measurement, 2015, 75: 180-191.
XIANG Jiawei, LIANG Ming, ZHONG Yongteng. Computation of stress intensity factors using wavelet-based elements [J]. Journal of Mechanics, 2016, 32(3): N1-N6.
LEI Y, LIN J, ZUO M J, et al. Condition monitoring and fault diagnosis of planetary gearboxes: a review [J]. Measurement, 2014, 48(1): 292-305.
XUE Xiaoming, ZHOU Jianzhang. A hybrid fault diagnosis approach based on mixed-domain state features for rotating machinery [J]. ISA Transactions, 2017, 66: 284-295.
QIU H, LEE J, LIN J, et al. Robust performance degradation assessment methods for enhanced rolling element bearing prognostics [J]. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 2003, 17(3/4): 127-140.
0
浏览量
6
下载量
8
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621