西北工业大学动力与能源学院,西安,710072
网络首发:2018-04-10,
纸质出版:2018
移动端阅览
孟通, 朱惠人, 刘存良, 等. 涡轮叶片双排气膜冷却效率叠加计算准确性研究[J]. 西安交通大学学报, 2018,52(4):55-62.
Superposition Prediction Accuracy of Film Cooling Efficiency on Turbine Blade[J]. 2018, 52(4): 55-62.
孟通, 朱惠人, 刘存良, 等. 涡轮叶片双排气膜冷却效率叠加计算准确性研究[J]. 西安交通大学学报, 2018,52(4):55-62. DOI: 10.7652/xjtuxb201804008.
Superposition Prediction Accuracy of Film Cooling Efficiency on Turbine Blade[J]. 2018, 52(4): 55-62. DOI: 10.7652/xjtuxb201804008.
为进一步了解涡轮叶片上多排气膜间的流动及换热规律
选取对气膜冷却效率有影响的3种典型因素(叶片型面、吹风比、孔排方式)进行了实验及数值计算研究
验证了涡轮叶片气膜冷却效率叠加计算的适用性。结果表明:由于叶片型面曲率的存在
叶片吸力面为凸面气膜更容易吹脱
气膜孔后冷却效率叠加计算误差约为5%; 叶片压力面为凹面气膜被压向壁面
前后排气膜间影响较大
叠加计算值比实验值约高13%。孔排排布方式对叠加计算结果同样有影响
叉排结构中气膜间呈现“块状叠加”现象
叠加计算值与实验值相比误差在5%以内。顺排结构中气膜呈现“层状叠加”现象
计算结果偏高
误差在10%左右。吹风比对冷却效率叠加计算准确性有较大影响
低吹风比时叠加计算较准确
随着吹风比增加叠加误差逐渐增大。针对叠加计算误差较大的工况
本文提出了相应的计算修正公式。
Experimental and numerical simulations were conducted on turbine blade to figure out influences of three typical factors(vane curvature
blowing ratio and hole arrangement)on superposition prediction of film cooling efficiency. Results show that because of the convex blade surface on the suction side
jet is easy to be blown off and the computational error of superposition of film cooling efficiency is about 5%. On the pressure side
jet is easy to be pressed onto the wall and the prediction becomes inaccurate
hence the superposition calculation result is about 13% higher than experimental value. Another significant influence results from hole arrangement
the superposition prediction on staggered hole arrangement is nearly the same as the measured value
while it is much higher for in-line arrangement. Blowing ratio also has an obvious influence on the accuracy of superposition prediction for film cooling holes on both pressure side and suction side. At low blowing ratio
results obtained by Sellers method agree well with the experimental ones
while as blowing ratio increases
the accuracy of superposition prediction is decreased. At last
modification of Sellers method is suggested to improve the prediction accuracy.
葛绍岩, 刘登瀛, 徐靖中, 等. 气膜冷却 [M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1985: 1-5.
HAN J C, SKIRVIN S C, HAYES L E, et al. Film cooling with multiple slots and louvers [J]. Journal of Heat Transfer, 1961, 83(3): 281-291.
SELLERS J P. Gaseous film cooling with multiple injection stations [J]. AIAA Journal, 1963, 1(9): 2154 -2156.
HAN J C, MEHENDALE A B. Flat plate film cooling with steam injection through one row and two rows of inclined holes [J]. Journal of Turbomachinery, 1986, 108(1): 137-144.
HARRINGTON M, MCWATERS M, BOGARD D G, et al. Full coverage film cooling with short normal injection holes [J]. Journal of Turbomachinery, 2001, 123(4): 798-805.
SASAKI M, TAKAHARA K, KUMAGAI T, et al. Film cooling effectiveness for injection from multirow holes [J]. ASME Journal of Engineering Power, 1979, 101(1): 101-108.
SAUMWEBER C, SCHULZ A. Interaction of film cooling rows: effects of hole geometry and row spacing on the cooling performance downstream of the second row of holes [J]. Journal of Turbomachinery, 2003, 126(2): 101-110.
SAKATA K, USUI H, TAKAHARA K. Cooling characteristics of film cooled turbine vane having multi-row of ejection holes [C]∥ASME 1978 International Gas Turbine Conference and Products Show. New York, USA: ASME, 1978: V01AT01A021.
MHETRAS S, HAN J C. Effect of superposition on span wise film-cooling effectiveness distribution on a gas turbine blade [C]∥ASME 2006 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. New York, USA: ASME, 2006: 477-487.
LUCKEY D W, LECUYER M R. Stagnation region gas film cooling: spanwise angled injection from multiple rows of holes: NASA contractor report 165333 [R]. Washington, USA: NASA, 1981.
ANDERSON J B, WINKA J R, BOGARD D G, et al. Evaluation of superposition predictions for showerhead film cooling on a vane [J]. Journal of Turbomachinery, 2015, 137(4): V05BT13A032.
SCHNEIDER M, PARNEIX S, VON WOLFERSDORF J. Effect of showerhead injection on superposition of multi-row pressure side film cooling with fan shaped holes [C]∥Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo 2003. New York, USA: ASME, 2003: 559-568.
KINELL M, UTRIAINEN E, NAJAFABADI H N, et al. Comparison of gas turbine vane pressure side and suction side film cooling performance and the applicability of superposition [C]∥ASME Turbo Expo 2012: Turbine Technical Conference and Exposition. New York, USA: ASME, 2012: 1479-1489.
CUTBIRTH J M, BOGARD D G. Evaluation of pressure side film cooling with flow and thermal field measurements [J]. Journal of Turbomachinery, 2002, 124(4): 670-677.
ANDREINI A, CARCASCI C, GORI S, et al. Film cooling system numerical design: adiabatic and conjugate analysis [C]∥Proceedings of the ASME Summer Heat Transfer Conference. New York, USA: ASME, 2005: 9-20.
LE GRIVÈS E, NICOLAS J J. Méthode nouvelle de calcul de l'efficacité de refroidissement des aubes de turbine par film d'air [J]. AGARD CP, 1977, 229(36): 1-12.
朱惠人, 郭涛, 许都纯. 双排簸箕形孔气膜冷却效率及其叠加算法 [J]. 航空动力学报, 2006, 21(5): 814-819.
ZHU Huiren, GUO Tao, XU Duchun. Film cooling and superposition method for double row dust-pan shaped holes [J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2006, 21(5): 814-819.
KIROLLOS B, POVEY T. An energy-based method for predicting the additive effect of multiple film cooling rows [C]∥ASME Turbo Expo 2013: Turbine Technical Conference and Exposition. New York, USA: ASME, 2013: V03BT13 A039.
刘存良. 新型高效气膜孔冷却特性研究 [D]. 西安: 西北工业大学, 2009.
MOFFAT R J. Describing the uncertainties in experimental results [J]. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 1988, 1(1): 3-17.
王瑞琴,高炎,晏鑫,等.燃气透平尾缘开缝区冷却性能的非定常研究.2017,51(12):98-103.[doi:10.7652/xjtuxb201712 015]
翟颖妮,刘存良.高主流湍流度下大倾角异型气膜孔冷却特性实验研究.2017,51(7):16-23.[doi:10.7652/xjtuxb201707 003]
范小军,杜长河,李亮,等.4种冷却结构对叶片前缘流动换热影响的比较研究.2017,51(7):37-43.[doi:10.7652/xjtuxb201707006]
杜长河,范小军,李亮,等.旋转半径和叶片安装角对动叶旋流冷却流动和传热特性的影响.2017,51(5):37-42.[doi:10.7652/xjtuxb201705006]
杜长河,范小军,李亮,等.抽吸孔对旋流和冲击冷却流动传热特性的影响.2017,51(1):19-24.[doi:10.7652/xjtuxb 201701004]
0
浏览量
5
下载量
1
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621