吉林大学计算机科学与技术学院,长春,130012
网络首发:2016-09-10,
纸质出版:2016
移动端阅览
郭森 1, 秦贵和 1, 2, 等. 多目标车辆路径问题的粒子群优化算法研究[J]. 西安交通大学学报, 2016,50(9):97-104.
A Novel Particle Swarm Optimization for Multi-Objective Vehicle Routing Problem[J]. 2016, 50(9): 97-104.
郭森 1, 秦贵和 1, 2, 等. 多目标车辆路径问题的粒子群优化算法研究[J]. 西安交通大学学报, 2016,50(9):97-104. DOI: 10.7652/xjtuxb201609016.
A Novel Particle Swarm Optimization for Multi-Objective Vehicle Routing Problem[J]. 2016, 50(9): 97-104. DOI: 10.7652/xjtuxb201609016.
针对粒子群算法(PSO)及其变种在约束多目标等复杂问题优化过程中所遇到的易陷入局部最优和收敛性问题
提出了一种基于动态学习和突变因子的粒子群算法(DSPSO)。首先
通过分析粒子群群体的学习机制
采用动态的学习策略
使粒子自适应动态调整认知成分和社会成分在迭代更新中的权重
以引导自身向最优解的方向探索
有效改善了群体的收敛速度; 其次
通过引入阶梯突变因子的概念
使粒子在陷入局部最优时进行试探跳跃
阶梯突变赋予粒子突破更新步长限制的能力
使粒子在当前位置速度矢量方向上的二维空间邻域内进行试探寻优
当发现更优解时则跳出当前局部最优; 最后
通过在BenchMark基准函数测试集中典型函数上的实验
证明了DSPSO的求解精度和收敛速度均优于对比算法。在多目标车辆路径问题实例优化中
解的可接受率和成功率分别为0.91和0.66
远优于对比算法中最优解的0.16和0.11
体现了所提改进算法在车辆路径问题中的优越性。
Considering the problems that particle swarm optimization(PSO)algorithm and its variants are easily to fall into local optimal solutions and convergence in the optimization process of complex constrained multi-objective problem
a novel PSO based on dynamic learning strategy and mutation factor(DSPSO)is proposed. First
through analyzing the learning mechanism of particle swarm
DSPSO introduces the dynamic learning strategy
enabling particles to adaptively adjust the weights of cognitive component and social component in the iteration renewal process and guide themselves to explore in the optimal direction
hence effectively accelerating the convergence rate. Second
by introducing the ladder mutation factor
when the particles are trapped in a local optimum
they are enabled to break the limit of update-step size to make tentative jumps in the two-dimensional spatial neighborhood of the velocity vector direction. When a better solution is found
the optimal solution would be updated. Finally
experiments are conducted on the typical functions of BenchMark
and the results show that the accuracy and convergence rate of DSPSO are better than the contrast algorithms. In the multi-objective vehicle routing problem optimization
the acceptable and success rates of the DSPSO solutions are 0.91 and 0.66
respectively
far outperform the results of 0.16 and 0.11 by comparison algorithm
reflecting the superiority of DSPSO in the multi-objective vehicle routing problem.
YUSUF I, BABA M S, IKSAN N. Applied genetic algorithm for solving rich VRP [J]. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 2014, 28(10): 957-991.
ZHANG Changsheng, YIN Hao, ZHANG Bin. A novel ant colony optimization algorithm for large scale QoS-based service selection problem [J]. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2013(6): 1104-1116.
KENNEDY J, EBERHART R C. Particle swarm optimization [M]. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2010: 760-766.
CHATTERJEE S, SARKAR S, HORE S, et al. Particle swarm optimization trained neural network for structural failure prediction of multistoried RC buildings[M/OL]∥Neural Computing Applications. [2015-12-12]. http: ∥link. springer. com/article/10.1007/s00521-016-2190-2.
许榕, 周东, 蒋士正, 等. 自适应粒子群神经网络交通流预测模型 [J]. 西安交通大学学报, 2015, 49(10): 103-108.
XU Rong, ZHOU Dong, JIANG Shizheng, et al. A traffic forecasting model using adaptive particle swarm optimization trained neural network [J]. Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University, 2015, 49(10): 103-108.
KENNEDY J, EBERHART R C. A discrete binary version of the particle swarm algorithm [C]∥IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE, 1997: 4104-4108.
PARSOPOULOS K E, VRAHATIS M N. Recent approaches to global optimization problems through particle swarm optimization [J]. Natural Computing, 2002, 1(2): 235-306.
WANG Zutong, GUO Jiansheng, ZHENG Mingfa, et al. Uncertain multiobjective traveling salesman problem [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2015, 241(2): 478-489.
LI Ning, ZOU Tong, SUN Debao. Particle swarm optimization for vehicle routing problem [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering, 2005, 19(6): 596-600.
DUAN Peibo, ZHANG Changsheng, ZHANG Bin. A local stability supported parallel distributed constraint optimization algorithm[J/OL]. The Scientific World Journal. [2015-12-10]. http: ∥www. hindawi. com/journals/tswj/2014/734975/abs/.
YIN Hao, ZHANG Changsheng, ZHANG Bin, et al. A hybrid multi-objective discrete particle swarm optimization algorithm for a SLA-aware service composition problem [J]. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2014, 89(1): 112-121.
SHI Yuhui, EBERHART R C. Empirical study of particle swarm optimization [C]∥Proceedings of the 1999 Congress on Evolutionary Computation. Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE, 1999: 1945-1950
TAN Guanzheng, BAO Kun, RIMIRU R. A composite particle swarm algorithm for global optimization of multimodal functions [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2014, 21(5): 1871-1880.
LI Jun, SUN Qirui, ZHOU Mengchu, et al. A new multiple traveling salesman problem and its genetic algorithm-based solution [C]∥The 2013 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE, 2013: 627-632.
TANG Yaoping, YU Hong, WANG Wenmu, et al. Application of TSP model based multi-objective in Yongzhou city's tourist routes [J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry Technology, 2011(10): 154-157.
SHI Yuhui, EBERHART R C. A modified particle swarm optimizer [C]∥The IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation. Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE, 1998: 69-73.
CLERC M. The swarm and the queen: towards a deterministic and adaptive particle swarm optimization [C]∥Proceedings of the 1999 Congress on Evolutionary Computation. Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE, 1999: 1951-1957.
LI Zhuangkuo, MA Yannan, LIU Liang. Particle swarm optimization based on the average optimal information for vehicle routing problem [C]∥The 6th International Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Design. Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE, 2013: 51-54.
0
浏览量
4
下载量
9
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621