西安交通大学机械工程学院,西安,710049
网络首发:2015-06-10,
纸质出版:2015
移动端阅览
周安安, 陈天宁, 王小鹏, 等. 自仿射接触点及其在分形接触理论中的应用[J]. 西安交通大学学报, 2015,49(6):8-15.
Self-Affine Contact Spot with Applications in Fractal Contact Theory[J]. 2015, 49(6): 8-15.
周安安, 陈天宁, 王小鹏, 等. 自仿射接触点及其在分形接触理论中的应用[J]. 西安交通大学学报, 2015,49(6):8-15. DOI: 10.7652/xjtuxb201506002.
Self-Affine Contact Spot with Applications in Fractal Contact Theory[J]. 2015, 49(6): 8-15. DOI: 10.7652/xjtuxb201506002.
为了深入研究分形方法在接触理论中的应用
利用数值模拟实验研究了分形粗糙表面的接触机理
并提出了自仿射接触点的概念。该概念充分利用分形函数自仿射的优点
改善了传统分形接触理论中微凸体不满足分形特性的缺陷
去除了接触理论中微凸体相互作用无法考虑等假设。将自仿射概念应用于分形接触理论中
建立了新的接触模型。模型基于粗糙表面均为各向同性的无润滑表面且可以利用W-M函数模拟的假设
利用接触中接触点最大变形量与接触面积的关系
对分形接触模型进行修正
得到更符合实际情况的分形接触理论。与经典的统计及分形接触模型进行对比
结果表明:G-W模型是一个弹性模型
较少考虑塑性接触
因此G-W模型在整体上会低估粗糙表面的接触压力; M-B模型利用单个余弦函数模拟微凸体
得到的最大接触变形量偏小
且微凸体尺寸分布函数的使用也不准确
M-B模型高估了接触压力; 提出的基于自仿射接触点的分形接触模型利用自仿射接触点代替微凸体进行理论推导
能更准确地计算出接触压力; 在相同的接触面积下
粗糙表面分形维数越大或分形特征尺度越小
接触压力越小。
The numerical simulation for contact essence between fractal rough surfaces is conducted
and a concept of self-affine contact spot is introduced to propose a new fractal contact model. Compared with the asperity in classical fractal contact model
the self-affine contact spot better describes the process of fractal contact. The self-affine contact spot now gets fractal
and the assumption of no interaction between asperities is unnecessary. Under the assumption that the rough surfaces are all unlubricated isotropic surfaces
this model can be simulated by W-M function. Making use of the relationship between the maximum deformation and contact area of contact spot
the classical fractal contact model is modified to further approach the engineering practice. It is found that G-W model ignores plastic deformation of contact spot thus to underestimate the contact load of rough surfaces; M-B model leads to a smaller maximum deformation to difficultly use size-distribution function and overestimates the contact load. The self-affine contact spot instead of asperity enables to accurately evaluate the contact pressure
The more the fractal dimension(or the less the fractal characteristic scale)
the less the contact pressure is needed for same contact area.
GORYACHEVA I G. Contact mechanics in tribology [M]. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 1998: 1-3.
GREENWOOD J A, WILLIAMSON J B P. Contact of nominally flat surfaces [J]. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London: Series A Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 1966, 295(1442): 300-319.
CHANG W R, ETSION I, BOGY D B. An elastic-plastic model for the contact of rough surfaces [J]. Journal of Tribology, 1987, 109(2): 257-263.
ZHAO Y W, MAIETTA D M, CHANG L. An asperity microcontact model incorporating the transition from elastic deformation to fully plastic flow [J]. Journal of Tribology, 2000, 122(1): 86-93.
YOU J M, CHEN T N. Statistical model for normal and tangential contact parameters of rough surfaces [J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers: Part C Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 2011, 225(1): 171-185.
MAJUMDAR A. Fractal surfaces and their applications to surface phenomena [D]. Berkeley, USA: University of California, 1989.
MAJUMDAR A, BHUSHAN B. Role of fractal geometry in roughness characterization and contact mechanics of surfaces [J]. Journal of Tribology, 1990, 112(2): 205-216.
MAJUMDAR A, BHUSHAN B. Fractal model of elastic-plastic contact between rough surfaces [J]. Journal of Tribology, 1991, 113(1): 1-11.
MORAG Y, ETSION I. Resolving the contradiction of asperities plastic to elastic mode transition in current contact models of fractal rough surfaces [J]. Wear, 2007, 262(5): 624-629.
MIAO X M, HUANG X D. A complete contact model of a fractal rough surface [J]. Wear, 2014, 309(1): 146-151.
MANDELBROT B B. The fractal geometry of nature [M]. London, UK: MacMillan, 1983: 116-119.
RUSS J. Fractal surfaces [M]. New York, USA: Springer-Verlag, 1994: 14-16.
张学良, 黄玉美. 机械结合部动态特性参数识别的优化方法 [J]. 太原重型机械学院学报, 1995, 16(4): 314-318.
ZHANG Xueliang, HUANG Yumei. An optimization method for identification of machine joint structural parameters [J]. Journal of Taiyuan Heavy Machinery Institute, 1995, 16(4): 314-318.
尤晋闽, 陈天宁. 结合面法向动态参数的分形模型 [J]. 西安交通大学学报, 2009, 43(9): 91-94.
YOU Jinmin, CHEN Tianning. Fractal model for normal dynamic parameters of joint surfaces [J]. Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University, 2009, 43(9): 91-94.
方江龙,王小鹏,陈天宁,等.动理论在预测非阻塞性颗粒阻尼能量耗散中的应用.2015,49(4):12-17.[doi:10.7652/xjtuxb201504003]
田红亮,赵美云,郑金华,等.新的柔性结合部法向接触刚度和接触阻尼方程.2015,49(1):118-126.[doi:10.7652/xjtuxb201501020]
田红亮,陈从平,方子帆,等.应用改进分形几何理论的结合部切向刚度模型.2014,48(7):46-52.[doi:10.7652/xjtuxb 201407009]
李昕,张娟,李全福,等.面向集成电路的大尺寸单晶石墨烯的可控制备方法.2014,48(6):103-109.[doi:10.7652/xjtuxb201406018]
张超,陈天宁,王小鹏,等.颗粒阻尼线性离散元模型参数的选取方法.2014,48(3):96-101.[doi:10.7652/xjtuxb201403 018]
舒歌群,赵文龙,梁兴雨,等.约束阻尼结构的振动分析及结构参数优化研究.2014,48(3):108-114.[doi:10.7652/xjtuxb201403020]
欧阳武,陈润霖,彭林,等.考虑局部固体接触的滑动轴承主刚度和主阻尼研究[J].2014,48(1):112-117.[doi:10.7652/xjtuxb201401019]
刘石,仲继泽,冯永新,等.使用磁流变阻尼器的大型汽轮发电机定子端部绕组振动控制.2013,47(4):39-43.[doi:10.7652/xjtuxb201304008]
宿月文,陈渭,朱爱斌,等.分形特征表面接触磨损模拟.2013,47(7):52-56.[doi:10.7652/xjtuxb201307010]
薛士明,曹军义,林京,等.分数阶阻尼裂纹转子的非线性动力学特性分析.2012,46(1):76-80.[doi:10.7652/xjtuxb 201201014]
田红亮,赵春华,朱大林,等.整个螺栓结合部的法向连接动刚度及试验验证.2012,46(9):31-36.[doi:10.7652/xjtuxb 201209007]
张学良,温淑花,兰国生,等.平面结合面切向接触阻尼分形模型及其仿真.2011,45(5):74-77.[doi:10.7652/xjtuxb 201105014]
王建伟,徐晖,马宁.内嵌自主移动钢球欧拉梁自适应碰撞减振研究.2010,44(11):103-108.[doi:10.7652/xjtuxb201011 021]
刘雅琳,徐自力,上官博,等.时频域交互法在微滑移干摩擦阻尼叶片振动分析中的应用.2009,43(11):22-26.[doi:10.7652/xjtuxb200911005]
尤晋闽,陈天宁.结合面法向动态参数的分形模型.2009,43(9):91-94.[doi:10.7652/xjtuxb200909020]
曹军义,谢航,蒋庄德.分数阶阻尼Duffing系统的非线性动力学特性.2009,43(3):50-54.[doi:10.7652/xjtuxb200903 011]
0
浏览量
4
下载量
1
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621