水中金属丝电爆炸冲击波一维数值模拟

李兴文; 晁攸闯; 吴坚; 贾申利; 邱爱慈

doi:10.7652/xjtuxb201504001

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

水中金属丝电爆炸冲击波一维数值模拟

更新时间：2025-07-09

- 水中金属丝电爆炸冲击波一维数值模拟
- One-Dimensional Simulation for Shock Waves Generated by Underwater Electrical Wire Explosion
- 西安交通大学学报 2015年49卷第4期页码：1-5+52
- 作者机构：
  
  西安交通大学电力设备电气绝缘国家重点实验室,西安,710049
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  : 2014-07-15。作者简介: 李兴文(1978—),男,教授。基金项目: 国家“863计划”资助项目(2013AA064502)
- DOI：10.7652/xjtuxb201504001
  中图分类号： TM89
- 网络首发：2015-04-10，
  
  纸质出版：2015
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
李兴文, 晁攸闯, 吴坚, 等. 水中金属丝电爆炸冲击波一维数值模拟[J]. 西安交通大学学报, 2015,49(4):1-5+52.

One-Dimensional Simulation for Shock Waves Generated by Underwater Electrical Wire Explosion[J]. 2015, 49(4): 1-5+52.
李兴文, 晁攸闯, 吴坚, 等. 水中金属丝电爆炸冲击波一维数值模拟[J]. 西安交通大学学报, 2015,49(4):1-5+52. DOI： 10.7652/xjtuxb201504001.

One-Dimensional Simulation for Shock Waves Generated by Underwater Electrical Wire Explosion[J]. 2015, 49(4): 1-5+52. DOI： 10.7652/xjtuxb201504001.

摘要

为了明确水中金属丝电爆炸冲击波的形成机理

基于经典活塞模型

采用相似参数法

引入双人工黏性系数

建立了水中金属丝电爆炸冲击波的一维计算模型。以等离子体放电通道边界膨胀轨迹作为模型唯一的输入参数

得到水中冲击波传播的时间与空间的分布规律

通过与其他文献实验结果的对比

验证了该计算方法的有效性。模拟结果表明

双人工黏性系数法使计算得到的冲击波更符合实际情况。爆炸初始时刻

等离子体放电通道边界膨胀压缩周围水介质产生的冲击波高达GPa级

冲击波压强峰值与径向传播距离的-0.70次幂成正比关系。文中采用的计算方法既不涉及脉冲放电过程以及复杂的放电等离子体物理变化过程

也不涉及放电通道与水的物理化学作用过程

只需根据诊断实验得到放电通道边界膨胀轨迹

即可模拟水中金属丝电爆炸冲击波的产生与传播过程

对工程实践具有重要的指导意义。

Abstract

To understand the formation mechanism of the shock waves(SWs)generated by underwater electrical wire explosion(UEWE)

double artificial viscosities are introduced to establish one-dimensional simulation model for SWs by UEWE based on classic piston model and similarity parameter method. In this simulation the trajectory of the discharge plasma channel(DPC)boundary serves as the unique input parameter

water pressure and SW velocity versus the distance from exploding wire and the period from exploding moment are obtained. The calculated results are compared with the experimental values from the other literatures to confirm the validity. The SWs calculated with double artificial viscosities method coincide well with the practical situation. At the explosion beginning the SW pressure reaches the grade of GPa at the DPC boundary

the obtained pressure amplitudes of SWs are found to be in direct proportion to the -0.7 power of radial propagation distance. The calculating method does not involve the complicated processes of pulse discharge

physical changes of DPC

and physical-chemistry interaction between DPC and water

only the DPC boundary trajectory obtained by experimental diagnostics is taken to simulate the generation and propagation processes of SWs generated by UEWE.

关键词

Keywords

references

CHO C, CHOI Y W, KANG C, et al. Effects of the medium on synthesis of nanopowders by wire explosion process [J]. Applied Physics Letters, 2007, 91(14): 141501.

TKACHENKO S I, ROMANOVA V M, MINGALEEV A R, et al. Study of plasma parameter's distribution upon electrical wire explosion [J]. European Physical Journal: D, 2009, 54(2): 335-341.

朱隽, 江孝国, 陈楠. 用于温密物质研究的强流电子束加载技术 [J]. 强激光与粒子束, 2013(1): 99-103.

ZHU Jun, JIANG Xiaoguo, CHEN Nan. High intensity electron beam as a tool for warm dense matter studies [J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beam, 2013(1): 99-103.

GRINENKO A, GUROVICH V T, KRASIK Y E, et al. Addressing water vaporization in the vicinity of an exploding wire [J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 2006, 100(11): 113309.

GRINENKO A, SAYAPIN A, GUROVICH V T, et al. Underwater electrical explosion of a Cu wire [J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 2005, 97(2): 023303.

SHEFTMAN D, SHAFER D, EFIMOV S, et al. Evaluation of electrical conductivity of Cu and Al through sub microsecond underwater electrical wire explosion [J]. Physics of Plasmas, 2012, 19(3): 034501.

ORESHKIN V I, CHAIKOVSKY S A, RATAKHIN N A, et al. “Water bath” effect during the electrical underwater wire explosion [J]. Physics of Plasmas, 2007, 14(10): 102703.

VEKSLER D, SAYAPIN A, EFIMOV S, et al. Characterization of different wire configurations in underwater electrical explosion [J]. IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, 2009, 37(1): 88-98.

张鸣远, 景思睿, 李国君. 高等工程流体力学 [M]. 西安: 西安交通大学出版社, 2006: 335.[10] LASTMAN G J, WENTZELL R A. Comparison of five models of spherical bubble response in an inviscid compressible liquid [J]. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1981, 69(3): 638-642.

汤文辉. 冲击波物理 [M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2011: 104.

VONNEUMANN J, RICHTMYER R D. A method for the numerical calculation of hydrodynamic shocks [J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 1950, 21(3): 232-237.

FEDOTOV-GEFEN A, EFIMOV S, GILBURD L, et al. Generation of a 400 GPa pressure in water using converging strong shock waves [J]. Physics of Plasmas, 2011, 18(6): 062701.

SAYAPIN A, GRINENKO A, EFIMOV S, et al. Comparison of different methods of measurement of pressure of underwater shock waves generated by electrical discharge [J]. Shock Waves, 2006, 15(2): 73-80.

LANDAU L D, LIFSHITZ E M. Fluid mechanics [M]. 2nd ed. Oxford UK: Pergamon Press, 1987: 271-273.

浏览量

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

单介质阻挡放电等离子体激励对平板气膜冷却性能的影响

采用试验设计方法的第三代CO2气体箔轴承箔片几何参数敏感性分析

冷库水平空气幕热湿阻隔性能数值模拟研究

结构-语义-残差协同的图像压缩框架：面向隐私保护与高保真重建

张角凹坑气膜孔对双层壁气膜冷却特性的影响