面向神经工效学的触控显示系统人机交互评价方法

董渊哲; 李晓玲; 姚磊; 姜颖

doi:10.7652/xjtuxb201405022

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

面向神经工效学的触控显示系统人机交互评价方法

更新时间：2025-07-09

- 面向神经工效学的触控显示系统人机交互评价方法
- A Neuroergonomic Evaluation Method of Human-Machine Interaction in Touch-Control Display System
- 西安交通大学学报 2014年48卷第5期页码：123-128
- 作者机构：
  
  西安交通大学机械工程学院,西安,710049
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  : 2013-09-16。作者简介: 董渊哲(1989—),男,硕士生;李晓玲(通信作者),女,副教授。基金项目: 国家自然科学基金资助项目(61075069)
- DOI：10.7652/xjtuxb201405022
  中图分类号： TH-3;TP11
- 网络首发：2014-05-10，
  
  纸质出版：2014
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
董渊哲, 李晓玲, 姚磊, 等. 面向神经工效学的触控显示系统人机交互评价方法[J]. 西安交通大学学报, 2014,48(5):123-128.

A Neuroergonomic Evaluation Method of Human-Machine Interaction in Touch-Control Display System[J]. 2014, 48(5): 123-128.
董渊哲, 李晓玲, 姚磊, 等. 面向神经工效学的触控显示系统人机交互评价方法[J]. 西安交通大学学报, 2014,48(5):123-128. DOI： 10.7652/xjtuxb201405022.

A Neuroergonomic Evaluation Method of Human-Machine Interaction in Touch-Control Display System[J]. 2014, 48(5): 123-128. DOI： 10.7652/xjtuxb201405022.

摘要

为了评价触控显示系统的人机交互工效

发展了一种面向神经工效学的多元评价方法

通过认知负荷和交互效率2个大方面、4个小指标(θ波功率、近似熵、误判率、反应间隔时间)进行多元评价。以座舱仪表界面为例设计了触控和操控2组对比实验

记录并分析操作者脑电信号及行为表现。分析结果表明:随着任务难度增大

误判率逐渐增大

同时θ波功率和近似熵整体逐渐增加

相关系数均大于0.5; 触控实验中双手比单手操控交互效率更高

误判率和间隔时间平均降低15.3%、6.3%; 触控式显示系统比模拟式系统认知负荷程度更低

θ波功率和近似熵平均降幅达24.7%和15.7%

交互效率更高

误判率和间隔时间平均降低69.9%和37.2%

表明触控式显示系统更具优势。

Abstract

A multiple evaluation method based on neuroergonomics is developed to evaluate the interaction efficiency of touch-control display system. This method involves the cognitive load and the interaction efficiency evaluation simultaneously from four indexes

i.e.

the power of theta wave value(Pθ)

approximate entropy(ApEn)

misjudgment rate(MR)and reaction time interval(RT). Taking the cockpit interface as example

two sets of contrast experiments are conducted separately under touch-control and non-touch conditions

and the performance and EEG signals of subjects are analyzed. It indicates that the misjudgment rate(MR)increases with the task difficulty

so as the cognitive load index Pθ and ApEn

and the correlation coefficients are all larger than 0.5; double-hand manipulation has higher efficiency than one-hand manipulation and the MR and RT are decreased by 15.3% and 6.3% on average; The Pθ and the ApEn are decreased by 24.7% and 15.7% under touch-control conditions

and MR and RT get lower by 69.9% and 37.2% on average than non-touch system.

关键词

Keywords

references

PROCTOR R, VU K. The cognitive revolution at age 50: has the promise of the human information-processing approach been fulfilled?[J]. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 2006, 21(3): 253-284.

PARASURAMAN R, RIZZO M. Neuroergonomics: the brain at work[M]. New York, USA: Oxford University Press, 2007: 3-12.

SCHNELL T, POSTNIKOV A, HAMEL N. Neuroergonomic assessment of simulator fidelity in an aviation centric live virtual constructive(LVC)application[M]∥ Lecture Notes in Computer Science: Vol 6780. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2011: 221-230.

PARASURAMAN R, BALDWINA C, KNOTT B, et al. Symposium: Neuroergonomics, technology, and cognition[J]. Work: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment and Rehabilitation, 2012, 41(S1): 5167-5171

任衍具. 神经工效学: 工效学研究的新取向[J]. 人类工效学, 2011, 17(3): 80-83.

REN Yanju. Neuroergonomics: a new orientation of ergonomics research[J]. Chinese Journal of Ergonomics, 2011, 17(3): 80-83.

HETTINGER L, BRANCO P, ENCARNACAO L, et al. Neuroadaptive technologies: applying neuroergonomics to the design of advanced interfaces[J]. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 2003, 4(7): 220-237.

STASI L, ANTOLI A, GEA M, et al. A neuroergonomic approach to evaluating mental workload in hypermedia interactions[J]. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 2011, 41(3): 298-304.

CAUSSE M, DEHAIS F, PERAN P, et al. The Effects of emotion on pilot decision-making: a neuroergonomic approach to aviation safety[J]. Transportation Research: Part C, 2013, 33: 272-281.

ABRAHAM J. 触控的力量[J]. 中国电子商情, 2011, 17(9): 59-60.ABRAHAM J. The power of touch[J]. China Electronic Market, 2011, 17(9): 59-60.

JIN S, TIEFEL T, WOLFE R, et al. Optically transparent, electrically conductive composite medium[J]. Science, 1992, 255(5043): 446-448.

HARGRAVES I. Technology and touch[J]. Knowledge Technology Policy, 2007, 20(4): 221-229.

HANRAHAN P. A graphical sense of touch[J]. Communications of the ACM, 2009, 52(12): 89-89.

FORLINES C, WIGDOR D, SHEN C, et al. Direct-touch vs. mouse input for tabletop displays[C]∥ Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. San Jose, CA, USA: ACM, 2007: 647-656.

C ZHANG. Analysis of mental fatigue basing on power spectrum features of EEG[J]. Space Medicine Medical Engineering, 2007, 21(1): 35-39.

FUNASE A, MOURI M, CICHOCKI A, et al. Suitable ICA algorithm for extracting saccade-related EEG signals[J]. Neural Information Processing, 2009(5863): 409-416.

PINCUS S M. Approximate entropy(ApEn)as a complexity measure[J]. Chaos, 1995, 5(1): 110-117.

PINCUS S M. Assessing serial irregularity and its implications for health[J]. Ann N Y Acad Sci, 2001, 954(1): 245-267.

MAJID B. Influence of simulation and real implementation skills on the cognitive learning aspects[C]∥3rd IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Infocommunications. Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE, 2012: 719-724.

杨德伟,冯祖仁,张翔.新型三臂巡线机器人机构设计及运动分析.2012,46(9):43-48.[doi:10.7652/xjtuxb201209009]

曹志华,陆小龙,赵世平,等.电力铁塔攀爬机器人的步态分析.2011,45(8):67-72.[doi:10.7652/xjtuxb201108012]

张鄂,洪军,李彦山,等.汽车人机界面人体上肢位姿建模与优化研究.2008,42(5):546-550.[doi:10.7652/xjtuxb200805 008]

张鄂,洪军,梁建,等.汽车人机接触界面体压分布的实验与评价研究.2007,41(5):538-542.[doi:10.7652/xjtuxb2007 05008]

吴华新,赵修斌.应用多劈模型的仪表着陆系统地形评估方法.2011,45(07):82-88.[doi:10.7652/xjtuxb201107016]

浏览量

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

箔片轴承结构阻尼的评价

不同板叠材料热声热机能量转换过程数值模拟研究

采用试验设计方法的第三代CO2气体箔轴承箔片几何参数敏感性分析

混合电解槽阵列协同的风光耦合制氢系统双层多目标优化

张角凹坑气膜孔对双层壁气膜冷却特性的影响