两种群体平衡模型在大规模多粒径泡状流中的应用研究

段欣悦 1; 2; 厉彦忠 1; 张孜博 2; 屠基元 2; 3

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

两种群体平衡模型在大规模多粒径泡状流中的应用研究

更新时间：2025-07-09

- 两种群体平衡模型在大规模多粒径泡状流中的应用研究
- Application of Two Population Balance Models to Predicting Large Scale Multi-Size Bubbly Flow
- 西安交通大学学报 2011年45卷第12期页码：92-98
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 西安交通大学动力工程多相流国家重点实验室,西安,710049
  2. 墨尔本皇家理工大学航空、机械与制造学院,维多利亚,墨尔本,澳大利亚,3083
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  : 2011-05-19. 作者简介: 段欣悦(1979-),女,博士生;厉彦忠(通信作者),男,教授,博士生导师. 基金项目: 教育部高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金资助项目(20100201110012)
- DOI：
  中图分类号： TQ028.8
- 网络首发：2011-12-10，
  
  纸质出版：2011
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
段欣悦 1, 2, 厉彦忠 1, 等. 两种群体平衡模型在大规模多粒径泡状流中的应用研究[J]. 西安交通大学学报, 2011,45(12):92-98.

Application of Two Population Balance Models to Predicting Large Scale Multi-Size Bubbly Flow[J]. 2011, 45(12): 92-98.
段欣悦 1, 2, 厉彦忠 1, 等. 两种群体平衡模型在大规模多粒径泡状流中的应用研究[J]. 西安交通大学学报, 2011,45(12):92-98. DOI：

Application of Two Population Balance Models to Predicting Large Scale Multi-Size Bubbly Flow[J]. 2011, 45(12): 92-98. DOI：

摘要

为了研究大规模多粒径泡状流流动特性

考虑到气泡聚并、破裂等微观机制现象对气泡尺寸、数密度等宏观参量的影响

分别采用两种基于群体平衡方程的数学模型——群数密度传递(BNDT)模型与多气泡组质量传递(MUSIG)模型

对具有聚并主导趋势特征的多粒径气液泡状流实验MTLOOP进行数值模拟

并与实验进行了对比研究

结果发现:两种群体平衡模型均可以较准确地捕捉到多粒径泡状流中气泡尺寸变化趋势以及含气率分布特征转换

且预测精度相当; 与MUSIG模型相比

BNDT模型计算时间节省了1/20～1/10

因此更适用于火箭工程中大型气液泡状流的工程预测.

Abstract

Aiming at investigating fluid flowing behaviours in large scale multi-size bubbly flow

two population balance models

named Bubble Number Density Transfer(BNDT)model and Multi-Size-Group(MUSIG)model coupled with bubble coalescence and breakage mechanism respectively

are employed to simulate the MTLOOP(Multi-phase Loop)experiment with characteristics of coalescence dominating trends. In comparison to experimental data

both models are able to well capture the dynamic evolution trends of bubble diameter and transition of gas volume fraction distribution

but the computing period of BNDT gets shorter by 1/10～1/20 than that of MUSIG under the similar predictions

thus BNDT model is more appropriate for predicting large scale multi-size bubbly flow in rocket engineering.

关键词

Keywords

references

GNOTKE O, BENK H, LOTH R. Experimental study on the number density distribution function in turbulent bubbly flows with coalescence and break-up [J].Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 2003, 27(7): 803-816.

KUMAR S, RAMKRISHNA D. On the solution of population balance equation by discretization: I A fixed pivot technique [J]. Chem Eng Sci, 1996, 51(8): 1311-1332.

KOCAMUSTAFAOGULLSRI G, ISHII M. Foundation of the interfacial area transport equation and its closure relations [J].International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 1995, 38(3): 481-493.

SOKOLICHIN A, EIGENBERGER G, LAPIN A, et al. Dynamic numerical simulation of gas-liquid two-phase flows Eular/Eular versus Eular/Lagrange [J]. Chem Eng Sci, 1997, 52(4): 611-622.

LUCAS D, KREPPER E, PRASSER H M. Prediction of radial gas profiles in vertical pipe flow on basis of the bubble size distribution [J]. International Journal of Thermal Sciences, 2001, 40(3): 217-225.

KREPPER E, LUCAS D, PRASSER H M. On the modeling of bubbly flow in vertical pipes [J].Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2005, 235(5): 597-611.

KREPPER E, LUCAS D, FRANK T, et al. The inhomogeneous MUSIG model for the simulation of polydispersed flows[J].Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2008, 238(7): 1690-1702.

王铁锋, 王金福, 杨卫国,等. 三相循环流化床中气泡大小及其分布的实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2001,52(3):197-203.

WANG Tiefeng, WANG Jinfu, YANG Weiguo, et al. Experimental study on bubble size distribution in three-phase circulating fluidized beds[J]. Chemical Industry Engineering, 2001,52(3): 197-203.

王晓东,张孜博,屠基元.垂直上升圆管内等温泡状流数值模拟[J].力学学报,2008,40(4):441-446.

WANG Xiaodong, ZHANG Zibo, TU Jiyuan. Numerical study on a simplified population balance approach for isothermal bubbly flow [J]. Acta Mechanica Sinica,2008,40(4):441-446.

CHEUNG S C P, YEOH G H, TU J Y. Population balance modeling of bubbly flows considering the hydrodynamics and thermomechanical processes [J]. American Institute of Chemical Engineers Journal, 2008, 54(7):1689-1710.

CHEUNG S C P, YEOH G H, TU J Y. On the numerical study of isothermal vertical bubbly flow using two population balance approaches[J].Chemical Engineering Science, 2007, 62(17): 4659-4674.

PRINCE M J, BLANCH H W. Bubble coalescence and break-up in air-sparged bubble columns[J]. American Institute of Chemical Engineers Journal, 1990, 36(10): 1485-1499.

LUO H, SVENDSEN H F. Theoretical model for drop and bubble break-up in turbulent flows[J]. American Institute of Chemical Engineers Journal, 1996, 42(5),: 1225-1233.

WU Q, KIM S, ISHII M, et al. One-group interfacial area transport in vertical bubbly flow[J]. Int J Heat Mass Trans, 1998, 41(8/9): 1103-1112.

LUCAS D, KREPPER E, PRASSER H M. Use of models for lift, wall and turbulent dispersion forces acting on bubbles for poly-disperse flows[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2007, 62(15): 4146-4157.

DREW D A, LAHEY J R T. Application of general constitutive principles to the derivation of multidimensional two-phase flow equation[J]. Int J Multiphase Flow, 1979, 5(4): 243-264.

ANSYS-CFX Development Team. Solver theory, multiphase flow theory [M]. Pittsburgh, PA, USA: ANSYS Inc., 2007.

MENTER F R. Two-equation eddy viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications[J]. AIAA Journal, 1994, 32(8): 1598-1605.

SATO Y, SADATOMI M, SEKOGUCHI K. Momentum and heat transfer in two-phase bubbly flow: I[J]. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 1981, 7(2): 167-177.

LUCAS D, KREPPER E, PRASSER H M. Development of co-current air-water flow in a vertical pipe[J]. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 2005, 31(12): 1304-1328.

SUN X D, KIMA S J, ISHII M, et al. Model evaluation of two-group interfacial area transport equation for confined upward flow[J]. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2004, 230(1/3): 27-47.

浏览量

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

液氢管路输运中静电积聚机理与电流密度分布特征研究

X射线辐照下聚酰亚胺材料空间电荷分布特性的数值模拟

异质裂隙内超临界CO2地热提取特性数值模拟研究

工质与叶轮传热对超临界二氧化碳向心透平气动性能与流动特性的作用机制

机翼近场尾流流动特性的附着涡模型分析