西安交通大学动力工程学院动力工程多相流国家重点实验室,西安,710049
网络首发:2007-07-10,
纸质出版:2007
移动端阅览
李印实, 何雅玲, 孙杰, 等. 纳米尺度并列双圆柱绕流的分子动力学模拟研究[J]. 西安交通大学学报, 2007,41(7):788-791.
李印实, 何雅玲, 孙杰, et al. Molecular Dynamics Simulation Study on Nanoscale Flow Interference Between Two Circular Cylinders[J]. 2007, 41(7): 788-791.
采用分子动力学模拟方法
对纳米尺度下的等大并列双圆柱绕流问题进行了数值研究.模拟结果表明:在低雷诺数(Re=22)、纳米尺度下
同样存在由于L
*
/D
*
(L
*
为两圆柱轴线之间的距离
D
*
为圆柱的直径)值的变化
导致流场内呈现出单涡脱落、双稳态以及双涡对称同步脱落的不同流动状态
这与宏观尺度下的研究结论相一致.然而
各种流动状态所对应的L
*
/D
*
范围却与宏观尺度下的数值和实验研究结果不一致.单涡脱落区域为L
*
/D
*
<
1.1
双稳态现象出现的区域为1.1
<
L
*
/D
*
<
1.8
且由于间隙流的影响
当L
*
/D
*
=1.2时
就已出现了典型的双稳态现象
双涡对称同步脱落区域为L
*
/D
*
>1.8.微观尺度下的3种不同特性的流动状态均比宏观研究结果提前
表明流动状态的变化具有明显的尺度特征.
The nanoscale phenomenon of two identical circular cylinders arranged in a side-by-side configuration in steady cross-flow was investigated using molecular dynamics simulations with the Lennard-Jones potential model at a low Reynolds number(Re=22). L
*
/D
*
the centre-to-centre pitch ratio
ranged from 1.0 to 2.0. Three basic flow patterns were observed and the results indicate that the characteristic ranges of the microscopic flow patterns are different from those of the macroscopic phenomenon. Single bluff-body vortex shedding range is L
*
/D
*
<
1.1. Biased flow with synchronized vortex shedding range is 1.1
<
L
*
/D
*
<
1.8 with the emergence of the typical biased flow at L
*
/D
*
=1.2 because of the presence of gap flow.Symmetric flow with synchronized vortex shedding range is L
*
/D
*
>1.8.All the boundaries of the L
*
/D
*
ranges corresponding to the three types of flow patterns in nanoscale are smaller than those in macroscopic phenomenon
which indicates significant scale effect.
Zdrovkovich M M. Review of flow interference between two circular cylinders in various arrangements[J].ASME Journal of Fluids Engineering, 1977, 99: 618-633.
El-Taher R M. Experimental study of the interaction between a pair of circular cylinders normal to a uniform shear flow[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 1984, 17(1): 117-132.
Williamson C H K. Evolution of a single wake behind a pair of bluff bodies[J]. Journal of Fluids Mechanics, 1985, 159:1-18.
Kim H J, Durbin P A. Investigation of the flow between a pair of circular cylinders in the flopping regime[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1988, 196: 431-448.
Sumner D, Wong S S T, Price S J, et al. Fluid behavior of side-by-side circular cylinders in steady cross flow[J]. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 1999, 13(3):309-338.
Rapaport D C, Clementi E. Eddy formation in obstructed fluid flow: a molecular-dynamics study[J]. Physical Review Letters, 1986, 57(6): 695-698.
Fan X J, Nhan P T, Yong N T, et al. Molecular dynamics simulation of a liquid in a complex nano channel flow[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2002, 14(3): 1146-1153.
Meiburg E. Comparison of the molecular dynamics method and the direct simulation Monte Carlo technique for flows around simple geometries[J]. Physics of Fluids, 1986, 29(10): 3107-3113.
李印实,何雅玲,孙杰,等.纳米通道圆柱绕流现象的分子动力学模拟研究[C]∥2006年工程热力学与能源利用学术会议论文集.重庆:工程热物理学会,2006:106-110.
Nagayama G, Cheng Ping. Effects of interface wettability on microscale flow by molecular dynamics simulation[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2004, 47(3): 501-513.
Delhommelle J, Millie P. Inadequacy of the Lorentz-Berthelot combing rules for accurate predictions of equilibrium properties by molecular simulation[J]. Molecular Physics, 2001, 99(8): 619-625.
Rapaport D C. The art of molecular dynamics simulation[M].Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995:1-17.
0
浏览量
5
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621