The Research of Time Sequence Rules of Activation between Motor Perception andMotor Feedback Based on Stress-Response Evoked Brain-Computer Interface Using Brain Network
|更新时间:2025-05-08
|
The Research of Time Sequence Rules of Activation between Motor Perception andMotor Feedback Based on Stress-Response Evoked Brain-Computer Interface Using Brain Network
ZHANG Kai, XU Guanghau, LI Wenping, et al. The Research of Time Sequence Rules of Activation between Motor Perception andMotor Feedback Based on Stress-Response Evoked Brain-Computer Interface Using Brain Network[J]. 2023, 57(10): 1-10.
DOI:
ZHANG Kai, XU Guanghau, LI Wenping, et al. The Research of Time Sequence Rules of Activation between Motor Perception andMotor Feedback Based on Stress-Response Evoked Brain-Computer Interface Using Brain Network[J]. 2023, 57(10): 1-10.DOI: 10.7652/xjtuxb202310001.
The Research of Time Sequence Rules of Activation between Motor Perception andMotor Feedback Based on Stress-Response Evoked Brain-Computer Interface Using Brain Network
To address the issue of weak temporal synchronization between the loop of intention perception and motor feedback activation in brain-machine interfaces during motor evoked processes
this research investigates the timing sequence effects of motor evoked responses. Drawing inspiration from spike-timing dependent plasticity theory
methods are explored to enhance closed-loop brain-machine temporal synchronization. A detection strategy is designed using multi-source information
such as force
displacement
and electroencephalogram(EEG)data
based on neural responses characteristics under stress stimulation. Temporal parameters are then used for brain functional network analysis to quantify the temporal patterns of motor perception feedback activation. Online experimental verification and statistical analysis confirm that the stress response motor evoked paradigm retains the characteristics of the traditional model
which could effectively activate the cortical motor region without actual movement. Moreover
it significantly enhances the timeliness of motor perception activation response of subjects in the brain-controlled closed-loop process. The perceptual and feedback response time delay ranges from 0.15 to 0.90 s
with the maximum activation response duration being approximately 400—600 ms. The proposed method exhibits improved synchronization of the activation response compared to the traditional paradigm. This approach not only reveals the temporal action rules of brain-computer regulation induced by stress-response
but also offers strong theoretical support for designing brain-machine interfaces with enhanced motor perception synchronization.
关键词
Keywords
references
YUAN Han, HE Bin. Brain-computer interfaces using sensorimotor rhythms: current state and future perspectives [J]. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 2014, 61(5): 1425-1435.
DONATI A R C, SHOKUR S, MORYA E, et al. Long-term training with a brain-machine interface-based gait protocol induces partial neurological recovery in paraplegic patients [J]. Scientific Reports, 2016, 6: 30383.
PARK E C, HWANGBO G. The effects of action observation gait training on the static balance and walking ability of stroke patients [J]. Journal of Physical Therapy Science, 2015, 27(2): 341-344.
BUNDY D T, SOUDERS L, BARANYAI K, et al. Contralesional brain-computer interface control of a powered exoskeleton for motor recovery in chronic stroke survivors [J]. Stroke, 2017, 48(7): 1908-1915.
RUBIN D B, AJIBOYE A B, BAREFOOT L, et al. Interim safety profile from the feasibility study of the BrainGate neural interface system [J]. Neurology, 2023, 100(11): 1177-1192.
MORONE G, PICHIORRI F. Post-stroke rehabilitation: challenges and new perspectives [J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 2023, 12(2): 550.
YU Min, ZHOU Yixin, LU Jingjue, et al. Research progress in neurorehabilitation [J]. Shanghai Medical Pharmaceutical Journal, 2015, 36(22): 4-8.
DING Yuchuan, LI Jie, CLARK J, et al. Synaptic plasticity in thalamic nuclei enhanced by motor skill training in rat with transient middle cerebral artery occlusion [J]. Neurological Research, 2003, 25(2): 189-194.
LUQUE N R, GARRIDO J A, NAVEROS F, et al. Distributed cerebellar motor learning: a spike-timing-dependent plasticity model [J]. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 2016, 10: 17.
BONASSI G, BIGGIO M, BISIO A, et al. Provision of somatosensory inputs during motor imagery enhances learning-induced plasticity in human motor cortex [J]. Scientific Reports, 2017, 7(1): 9300.
MALOUIN F, RICHARDS C L, JACKSON P L, et al. The kinesthetic and visual imagery questionnaire(KVIQ)for assessing motor imagery in persons with physical disabilities: a reliability and construct validity study [J]. Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy, 2007, 31(1): 20-29.
ZHANG Chenguang, JU Fen, SUN Wei, et al. Effects of training with a brain-computer interface-controlled robot on rehabilitation outcome in patients with subacute stroke: a randomized controlled trial [J]. Neurology and Therapy, 2022, 11(2): 679-695.
FADEEV K A, SMIRNOV A S, ZHIGALOVA O P, et al. Too real to be virtual: autonomic and EEG responses to extreme stress scenarios in virtual reality [J]. Behavioural Neurology, 2020, 2020: 5758038.
ZHANG Kai, XU Guanghua, DU Chenghang, et al. Enhancement of capability for motor imagery using vestibular imbalance stimulation during brain computer interface [J]. Journal of Neural Engineering, 2021, 18(5): 056064.
COITO A, MICHEL C M, VULLIEMOZ S, et al. Directed functional connections underlying spontaneous brain activity [J]. Human Brain Mapping, 2019, 40(3): 879-888.
LIANG Xia, WANG Jinhui, HE Yong. Human connectome:structural and functional brain networks [J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2010, 55(16): 1565-1583.
HOODGAR M, KHOSROWABADI R, NAVI K, et al. Brain functional connectivity changes during learning of time discrimination [J]. Basic and Clinical Neuroscience, 2022, 13(4): 531-550.
LU C F, TENG S, HUNG C I, et al. Reorganization of functional connectivity during the motor task using EEG time-frequency cross mutual information analysis [J]. Clinical Neurophysiology, 2011, 122(8): 1569-1579.[20] REGGIANI E, D'ARNESE E, PURGATO A, et al. Pearson correlation coefficient acceleration for modeling and mapping of neural interconnections [C]//2017 IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium Workshops(IPDPSW). Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE, 2017: 223-228.
LIU Jianping, ZHANG Chong, ZHENG Chongxun. Estimation of the cortical functional connectivity by directed transfer function during mental fatigue [J]. Applied Ergonomics, 2010, 42(1): 114-121.
KHAN D M, YAHYA N, KAMEL N, et al. A novel method for efficient estimation of brain effective connectivity in EEG [J]. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 2023, 228: 107242.
RUBINOV M, SPORNS O. Complex network measures of brain connectivity: uses and interpretations [J]. NeuroImage, 2010, 52(3): 1059-1069.
LI Fali, LIU Tiejun, WANG Fei, et al. Relationships between the resting-state network and the P3: evidence from a scalp EEG study [J]. Scientific Reports, 2015, 5(1): 15129.
TOPPI J, PETTI M, MATTIA D, et al. Time-varying effective connectivity for investigating the neurophysiological basis of cognitive processes [M]//SAKKALIS V. Modern Electroencephalographic Assessment Techniques: Theory and Applications. New York, NY: Springer New York, 2015: 171-204.
MANSOORY M S, ALLAHVERDY A, BEHBOUDI M, et al. Local efficiency analysis of resting state functional brain network in methamphetamine users [J]. Behavioural Brain Research, 2022, 434: 114022.