Thermal Characteristics of Cryogenic Target with Different Types of Capsule Supports

LI Li; LI Cui; ZHAO Xiaodi; HU Menghua; FU Zhiying; LI Yanzhong

doi:10.7652/xjtuxb202305015

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Thermal Characteristics of Cryogenic Target with Different Types of Capsule Supports

更新时间：2025-07-09

- Thermal Characteristics of Cryogenic Target with Different Types of Capsule Supports
- Vol. 57, Issue 5, Pages: 149-158(2023)
- 作者机构：
  
  西安交通大学能源与动力工程学院,西安,710049
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.7652/xjtuxb202305015
  CLC： TB661
- Online First：10 May 2023，
  
  Published：2023
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
LI Li, LI Cui, ZHAO Xiaodi, et al. Thermal Characteristics of Cryogenic Target with Different Types of Capsule Supports[J]. 2023, 57(5): 149-158.
DOI：

LI Li, LI Cui, ZHAO Xiaodi, et al. Thermal Characteristics of Cryogenic Target with Different Types of Capsule Supports[J]. 2023, 57(5): 149-158. DOI： 10.7652/xjtuxb202305015.

摘要

针对支撑结构的引入对靶丸温度分布产生扰动这一问题

建立带不同靶丸支撑结构的三维低温靶模型

基于离散坐标辐射模型和Boussinesq假设

研究了支撑结构对靶丸温度特性的影响

并对比了不同支撑结构靶丸温差对黑腔内氦气压力变化的敏感程度

最后针对泡沫垫衬薄膜支撑研究了泡沫材料参数的影响规律。结果表明:支撑膜能显著降低黑腔内自然对流强度

薄膜支撑与两极支撑靶丸温度均匀性优于无支撑膜的充气管支撑和支撑杆支撑

薄膜支撑相比两极支撑靶丸温度均匀性略高; 充气管直径越大

靶丸温度均匀性越差。基准工况下

薄膜支撑靶丸外表面最大温差最小

温度均匀性最好

两极支撑、充气管支撑及支撑杆支撑最大温差较薄膜支撑分别增大了5.92%、32.71%及17.99%; 氦气压力升高

靶丸外表面温度均匀性逐渐恶化

薄膜支撑和两极支撑靶丸温差对氦气压力变化的敏感度更低; 对于泡沫垫衬薄膜支撑

通过选用导热系数较大的泡沫材料并减小其厚度可获得较好的靶丸温度均匀性。该计算结果可为靶丸支撑结构的工程设计提供一定的理论支撑。

Abstract

In this study

three-dimensional cryogenic target models are established based on the discrete ordinates radiation model and Boussinesq hypothesis to investigate the perturbations of capsule thermal distribution caused by the use of capsule supports. Variations of temperature and flow field distributions as well as the sensitivity to helium pressure in hohlraum with different capsule supports are obtained. Finally

the influence of foam material parameters of the foam shell support is investigated. The results show that the targets using tent and polar tent supports have more uniform capsule temperature distribution than those with the fill-tube support and rod support as a result of the weakened natural convection inside the hohlraum. The tent support is more effective than the polar tent support due to its better film arrangement. For the two types of non-film supports

the pure fill-tube support provides the worst temperature uniformity due to its larger fill-tube diameter when compared with the rod support. Under typical operating conditions

the capsule with tent support has the smallest maximum temperature difference of 2.45 mK; the maximum temperature differences of the capsule with the polar tent support

fill-tube support and rod support are 5.92%

32.71% and 17.99% higher

respectively. Moreover

the temperature uniformity deteriorates with the increase of helium pressure for the four support types. The temperature uniformity of the tent support and polar tent support is less sensitive to the helium pressure change. For the foam shell support

a more uniform capsule temperature distribution can be obtained by choosing a foam shell with higher thermal conductivity and smaller thickness. The calculation results can serve as a theoretical basis to some extent for the engineering design of the capsule support.

关键词

Keywords

references

江少恩, 丁永坤, 缪文勇, 等. 我国激光惯性约束聚变实验研究进展 [J]. 中国科学: G辑物理学力学天文学, 2009, 39(11): 1571-1583.

JIANG Shaoen, DING Yongkun, MIAO Wenyong, et al. Recent progress of inertial confinement fusion experiments in China [J]. Science in China Series: G Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy, 2009, 39(11): 1571-1583.

张杰. 浅谈惯性约束核聚变 [J]. 物理, 1999, 28(3): 142-152.

ZHANG Jie. An overview of inertial confinement fusion [J]. Physics, 1999, 28(3): 142-152.

CLARK D S, WEBER C R, KRITCHER A L, et al. Modeling and projecting implosion performance for the National Ignition Facility [J]. Nuclear Fusion, 2019, 59(3): 032008.

BACLET P, BACHELET F, CHOUX A, et al. Research program for the fabrication of the cryogenic target to reach ignition on the LMJ: results and prospects [J]. Fusion Science and Technology, 2006, 49(4): 565-573.

HURRICANE O A, CALLAHAN D A, CASEY D T, et al. Fuel gain exceeding unity in an inertially confined fusion implosion [J]. Nature, 2014, 506(7488): 343-348.

唐永建, 蒋伟阳. ICF低温冷冻靶制备技术进展 [J]. 强激光与粒子束, 1998, 10(1): 156-161.

TANG Yongjian, JIANG Weiyang. Cryogenic targets fabrication methods for inertial confinement fusion [J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 1998, 10(1): 156-161.

LONDON R A, KOZIOZIEMSKI B J, MARINAK M M, et al. Low mode control of cryogenic ICF fuel layers using infrared heating [J]. Fusion Science and Technology, 2006, 49(4): 608-615.

MARTIN M, GAUVIN C, CHOUX A, et al. A way to reach the cryogenic's temperature and roughness requirements for the laser megajoule facility [J]. Fusion Science and Technology, 2007, 51(4): 747-752.

MARTIN M, MOLL G, LALLET F, et al. With regard to the low mode target lifetime: an analytical model [J]. Fusion Science and Technology, 2011, 59(1): 166-170.

黄鑫, 彭述明, 周晓松, 等. 黑腔冷冻靶传热与自然对流的数值模拟研究 [J]. 物理学报, 2015, 64(21): 215201-1-215201-8.

HUANG Xin, PENG Shuming, ZHOU Xiaosong, et al. Numerical simulation of heat transfer and natural convection of the indirect-driven cryogenic target [J]. Acta Physica Sinica, 2015, 64(21): 215201-1-215201-8.

MOLL G, BACLET P, MARTIN M. Recent results in thermal and hydrodynamic simulations of cryogenic target for LMJ [J]. Fusion Science and Technology, 2006, 49(4): 574-580.

SANCHEZ J J, GIEDT W H. Thin films for reducing tamping gas convection heat transfer effects in a national ignition facility hohlraum [J]. Fusion Science and Technology, 2003, 44(4): 811-819.

李翠, 赵小迪, 郭富城, 等. 靶丸位置对冷冻靶物理场的影响规律研究 [J]. 西安交通大学学报, 2021, 55(10): 123-130.

LI Cui, ZHAO Xiaodi, GUO Fucheng, et al. Effects of capsule sag and shift on the thermal environment of cryogenic target [J]. Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University, 2021, 55(10): 123-130.

李翠, 赵小迪, 李黎, 等. 微充气管残留燃料冰对冷冻靶控温过程的影响分析 [J]. 西安交通大学学报, 2022, 56(6): 50-57.

LI Cui, ZHAO Xiaodi, LI Li, et al. Influence of residual fuel ice in micro gas filling tube on the temperature control of ICF cryogenic target [J]. Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University, 2022, 56(6): 50-57.

HAMMEL B A, TOMMASINI R, CLARK D S, et al. Simulations and experiments of the growth of the “tent” perturbation in NIF ignition implosions [J]. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2016, 717(1): 012021.

NAGEL S R, HAAN S W, RYGG J R, et al. Effect of the mounting membrane on shape in inertial confinement fusion implosions [J]. Physics of Plasmas, 2015, 22(2): 022704.

MEEZAN N B, EDWARDS M J, HURRICANE O A, et al. Indirect drive ignition at the National Ignition Facility [J]. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, 2017, 59(1): 014021.

高莎莎, 吴小军, 何智兵, 等. 激光惯性约束聚变靶制备技术研究进展 [J]. 强激光与粒子束, 2020, 32(3): 032001.

GAO Shasha, WU Xiaojun, HE Zhibing, et al. Research progress of fabrication techniques for laser inertial confinement fusion target [J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2020, 32(3): 032001.

HAMMEL B A, WEBER C R, STADERMANN M, et al. A “polar contact” tent for reduced perturbation and improved performance of NIF ignition capsules [J]. Physics of Plasmas, 2018, 25(8): 082714.

MARTINEZ D A, SMALYUK V A, MACPHEE A G, et al. Hydro-instability growth of perturbation seeds from alternate capsule-support strategies in indirect-drive implosions on National Ignition Facility [J]. Physics of Plasmas, 2017, 24(10): 102707.

SMALYUK V A, ROBEY H F, ALDAY C L, et al. Review of hydro-instability experiments with alternate capsule supports in indirect-drive implosions on the National Ignition Facility [J]. Physics of Plasmas, 2018, 25(7): 072705.

WEBER C R, CASEY D T, CLARK D S, et al. Improving ICF implosion performance with alternative capsule supports [J]. Physics of Plasmas, 2017, 24(5): 056302.

MACPHEE A G, CASEY D T, CLARK D S, et al. X-ray shadow imprint of hydrodynamic instabilities on the surface of inertial confinement fusion capsules by the fuel fill tube [J]. Physical Review: E, 2017, 95(3): 031204.

谷建法, 葛峰峻, 戴振生, 等. 靶丸支撑膜对ICF内爆性能影响的模拟研究 [J]. 计算物理, 2020, 37(6): 631-638.

GU Jianfa, GE Fengjun, DAI Zhensheng, et al. Influence of capsule support tent on ICF capsule implosion performance: simulation study [J]. Chinese Journal of Computational Physics, 2020, 37(6): 631-638.

HAAN S W, LINDL J D, CALLAHAN D A, et al. Point design targets, specifications, and requirements for the 2010 ignition campaign on the National Ignition Facility [J]. Physics of Plasmas, 2011, 18(5): 051001.

AZIZ A. The critical thickness of insulation [J]. Heat Transfer Engineering, 1997, 18(2): 61-91.

Views

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Study of the Mechanism of Electrostatic Accumulation and Current Density Distribution Characteristics During Liquid Hydrogen Pipeline Transportation

Numerical Simulation of Space Charge Distribution Characteristics of Polyimide Materials under X-Ray Irradiation

Numerical Simulation Study on Geothermal Extraction Characteristics of Supercritical CO2 in Heterogeneous Fractures

Action Mechanism of Heat Transfer between the Working Medium and the Impeller on Aerodynamic Performance and Flow Characteristics of Radial Inflow Turbines with Supercritical Carbon Dioxide

Analysis of the Attached Vortex Model for the Flow Characteristics of Wing Near-Field Wakes

Related Author

SUN Wenhao

LIU Hongbao

WANG Lei

QING Ziyou

LI Zhuolun

MA Yuan

LI Yanzhong

ZHONG Hui

Related Institution

School of Energy and Power Engineering，Xi’an Jiaotong University

Aerospace System Engineering Shanghai

School of Electrical Engineering，Xi’an Jiaotong University

Northwest Institute of Nuclear Technology

Institute of Electronic Engineering，China Academy of Engineering Physics

⁰