Analysis on Aerodynamic Sensitivity of Non-Axisymmetric Hub of Centrifugal Impeller

JI Cheng; HUANG Zhaoqian; XI Guang

doi:10.7652/xjtuxb202302007

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Analysis on Aerodynamic Sensitivity of Non-Axisymmetric Hub of Centrifugal Impeller

更新时间：2025-07-09

- Analysis on Aerodynamic Sensitivity of Non-Axisymmetric Hub of Centrifugal Impeller
- Vol. 57, Issue 2, Pages: 57-66(2023)
- 作者机构：
  
  西安交通大学能源与动力工程学院,西安,710049
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.7652/xjtuxb202302007
  CLC： V232.3
- Online First：10 February 2023，
  
  Published：2023
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
JI Cheng, HUANG Zhaoqian, XI Guang. Analysis on Aerodynamic Sensitivity of Non-Axisymmetric Hub of Centrifugal Impeller[J]. 2023, 57(2): 57-66.
DOI：

JI Cheng, HUANG Zhaoqian, XI Guang. Analysis on Aerodynamic Sensitivity of Non-Axisymmetric Hub of Centrifugal Impeller[J]. 2023, 57(2): 57-66. DOI： 10.7652/xjtuxb202302007.

摘要

为了研究非轴对称轮盘面对高压比离心叶轮的效率、压比、堵塞流量及工况范围的影响规律

采用基于人工神经网络的非轴对称轮盘面全工况预测模型

用于预测30个形状控制参数下轮盘面对气动性能的影响。同时

结合Sobol敏感性分析方法

提取对各性能指标影响显著的敏感参数

研究了敏感参数对于叶轮性能的影响规律。结果表明:轮盘面对效率、压比及堵塞流量的控制主要取决于各个参数独立影响的线性叠加

进口附近轮盘面的凹陷有利于提升最高效率并增大堵塞流量; 叶轮出口压力侧分流流道附近的凸起有利于最高效率的提升

但会降低叶轮的压比。不同的是

轮盘面对叶轮工况范围的影响主要源于3个及以上参数的高阶交互作用。利用敏感性分析结果

从经验上人为给定控制参数的取值

实现了离心叶轮非轴对称轮盘面快速优化

在设计点压比不变的情况下

使绝热效率提升了0.9%

工况范围提升了2%

说明敏感性分析可以有效缩短优化周期

从而降低优化成本。该研究结果可为今后的离心叶轮气动设计及优化提供方向性指导。

Abstract

To explore the influence of the non-axisymmetric hub on the efficiency

pressure ratio

mass-flow of choke and flow range of high-pressure-ratio centrifugal impeller

an artificial neural network(ANN)-based full range prediction model of non-axisymmetric hub is adopted to predict the influence of non-axisymmetric hub on aerodynamic performance under 30 shape control parameters. With Sobol sensitivity analysis method

the sensitive parameters that have significant impact on performance are extracted and studied for their influence on the impeller performance. The results show that the control of the efficiency

pressure ratio and mass-flow of choke by hub surfaces mainly depends on the linear superposition of independent effects of each critical parameter. The concave surface of the hub near the impeller inlet is favorable to improve the maximum efficiency and increase the mass-flow of choke

while the convex surface of the hub near the impeller outlet at the channel of pressure side is conducive to the improvement of the maximum efficiency

but it reduces the pressure ratio of the impeller. In contrast

the influence of the hub deformation on the flow range of the impeller is mainly caused by complex high-order interaction of 3 or more parameters. Based on the results of the sensitivity analysis

the values of the control parameters are manually determined

thereby realizing rapid optimization of the non-axisymmetric hub of the centrifugal impeller

increasing the isentropic efficiency by 0.9% and the flow range by 2% with the designed pressure ratio remaining unchanged. This indicates that the sensitivity analysis effectively shortens the optimization period and reduces optimization costs. This research provides directional guidance for the aerodynamic design and optimization of centrifugal impellers in the future.

关键词

Keywords

references

IBARAKI S, MATSUO T, KUMA H, et al. Aerodynamics of a transonic centrifugal compressor impeller [J]. Journal of Turbomachinery, 2003, 125(2): 346-351.

HIGASHIMORI H, HASAGAWA K, SUMIDA K, et al. Detailed flow study of Mach number 1.6 high transonic flow with a shock wave in a pressure ratio 11 centrifugal compressor impeller [J]. Journal of Turbomachinery, 2004, 126(4): 473-481.

IBARAKI S, MATSUO T, YOKOYAMA T. Investigation of unsteady flow field in a vaned diffuser of a transonic centrifugal compressor [J]. Journal of Turbomachinery, 2007, 129(4): 686-693.

BULOT N, TRÉBINJAC I, OTTAVY X, et al. Experimental and numerical investigation of the flow field in a high-pressure centrifugal compressor impeller near surge [J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers: Journal of Power and Energy, 2009, 223(6): 657-666.

RODGERS C. Flow ranges of 8.0:1 pressure ratio centrifugal compressors for aviation applications[C]//ASME Turbo Expo 2005: Power for Land, Sea, and Air. New York, NY, USA: ASME, 2005: 801-811.

WANG X F, XI G, WANG Z H. Aerodynamic optimization design of centrifugal compressor's impeller with Kriging model [J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers: Part A Journal of Power and Energy, 2006, 220(6): 589-597.

傅珏, 蒋伟, 柳一鸣, 等. 叶顶间隙几何不确定性对离心叶轮气动性能的影响 [J]. 西安交通大学学报, 2018, 52(11): 51-57.

FU Jue, JIANG Wei, LIU Yiming, et al. Influence of tip clearance geometrical uncertainties on the aerodynamic performance of centrifugal impellers [J]. Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University, 2018, 52(11): 51-57.

李琛玺, 王静, 宋立明, 等. 高压比离心叶轮气动强度多学科优化与知识挖掘 [J]. 西安交通大学学报, 2017, 51(5): 102-111.

LI Chenxi, WANG Jing, SONG Liming, et al. Aero-mechanical multidisciplinary optimization and knowledge discovery of high pressure ratio centrifugal impeller [J]. Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University, 2017, 51(5): 102-111.

赵会晶, 王志恒, 唐永洪, 等. 叶片前缘倾掠对离心叶轮气动性能的影响 [J]. 西安交通大学学报, 2015, 49(11): 1-7.

ZHAO Huijing, WANG Zhiheng, TANG Yonghong, et al. Effects of blade leading edge lean and sweep on the aerodynamic performance of centrifugal impellers [J]. Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University, 2015, 49(11): 1-7.

刘小民, 张文斌. 采用遗传算法的离心叶轮多目标自动优化设计 [J]. 西安交通大学学报, 2010, 44(1): 31-35.

LIU Xiaomin, ZHANG Wenbin. Multi-objective automatic optimization design of centrifugal impeller based on genetic algorithm [J]. Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University, 2010, 44(1): 31-35.

LI Xiaojian, ZHAO Yijia, LIU Zhengxian. A novel global optimization algorithm and data-mining methods for turbomachinery design [J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2019, 60(2): 581-612.

JI Cheng, WANG Zhiheng, XI Guang. Computer 3D vision-aided full-3D optimization of a centrifugal impeller [J]. Journal of Turbomachinery, 2022, 144(9): 091011.

JI Cheng, WANG Zhiheng, TANG Yonghong, et al. A flow information-based prediction model applied to the nonaxisymmetric hub optimization of a centrifugal impeller [J]. Journal of Mechanical Design, 2021, 143(10): 103502.

GARSON G D. Interpreting neural-network connection weights [J]. AI Expert, 1991, 6(4): 46-51.

SALTELLI A, MARIVOET J. Non-parametric statistics in sensitivity analysis for model output: a comparison of selected techniques [J]. Reliability Engineering System Safety, 1990, 28(2): 229-253.

CHOI J Y, CHOI C H. Sensitivity analysis of multilayer perceptron with differentiable activation functions [J]. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 1992, 3(1): 101-107.

蔡毅, 邢岩, 胡丹. 敏感性分析综述 [J]. 北京师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2008, 44(1): 9-16.

CAI Yi, XING Yan, HU Dan. On sensitivity analysis [J]. Journal of Beijing Normal University(Natural Science), 2008, 44(1): 9-16.

MCKAY M D, BECKMAN R J, CONOVER W J. A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code [J]. Technometrics, 2000, 42(1): 55-61.

HORNBERGER G M, SPEAR R C. Approach to the preliminary analysis of environmental systems [J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 1981, 12(1): 7-18.

MORRIS M D. Factorial sampling plans for preliminary computational experiments [J]. Technometrics, 1991, 33(2): 161-174.

SOBOL I M. Global sensitivity indices for nonlinear mathematical models and their Monte Carlo estimates [J]. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 2001, 55(1/3): 271-280.

SALTELLI A. Making best use of model evaluations to compute sensitivity indices [J]. Computer Physics Communications, 2002, 145(2): 280-297.

SALTELLI A, ANNONI P, AZZINI I, et al. Variance based sensitivity analysis of model output design and estimator for the total sensitivity index [J]. Computer Physics Communications, 2010, 181(2): 259-270.

刘欢, 吴琼莉, COURNÈDE P H. 不同抽样算法对Sobol敏感性分析影响的研究 [J]. 数学物理学报, 2018, 38(2): 372-384.

LIU Huan, WU Qiongli, COURNÈDE P H. Research on the effects of different sampling algorithm on Sobol sensitivity analysis [J]. Acta Mathematica Scientia, 2018, 38(2): 372-384.

SOBOL' I M. On the distribution of points in a cube and the approximate evaluation of integrals [J]. USSR Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics, 1967, 7(4): 86-112.

Views

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Numerical Investigation on the Influence of Blade Profile Deviation on the Performance of Centrifugal Impellers

Numerical Study on the Influence of Bionic Arc-Shaped Micro-Grooves on the Aerodynamic Performance of Centrifugal Impellers

Study on Flow Fields in a Centrifugal Fan with Holes in the Impeller Shroud

Simulation Analysis and Optimization for the Electromagnetic Susceptibility of Electronic Devices

Numerical Study on Internal Flows in Centrifugal Tandem-Blade Impeller

Related Author

XI Guang

WANG Zhiheng

LEI Weipeng

FAN Hongzhou

YUE Bao

ZHANG Weijiang

GUO Hongtao

梁亚勋

Related Institution

School of Energy and Power Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University

Guangdong Midea HVAC Equipment Co., Ltd.

School of Electronics and Information Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University

The National Engineering Research Center of Fluid Machinery and Compressor, Xi'an Jiaotong University

⁰