Multi-Condition Aerodynamic Optimization of the Air Compressor Impeller Used in Fuel-Cell Vehicles[J]. 2021, 55(9): 39-48.
DOI:
Multi-Condition Aerodynamic Optimization of the Air Compressor Impeller Used in Fuel-Cell Vehicles[J]. 2021, 55(9): 39-48.DOI: 10.7652/xjtuxb202109005.
Multi-Condition Aerodynamic Optimization of the Air Compressor Impeller Used in Fuel-Cell Vehicles
Aiming at variable working conditions and the problem of excessive parasitic power of fuel-cell system caused by over high pressure ratio of fuel-cell centrifugal compressor
a multi-objective and multi-condition aerodynamic optimal design method with constraints for fuel-cell air compressor impeller is proposed based on parametric design
Latin hypercube sampling
radial basis function neural network and multi-objective grey wolf optimization algorithm. The numerical programs are developed independently to realize the design process of aerodynamic optimization. Taking the impellers of a two-stage fuel-cell centrifugal air compressor as the optimization objects
Latin hypercube sampling is used to obtain the sample space of the key design variables of the impeller. Based on the internal code of flow-field analysis
the corresponding aerodynamic performance target parameters of the impeller samples are calculated. On this basis
the neural network program is used to establish the flow-field analysis surrogate model. Taking the efficiency of design point and the efficiency and pressure ratio of non-design point as objectives
and the design pressure ratio as constraint
the multi-objective grey wolf algorithm program is used to carry out the multi-condition and multi-objective aerodynamic optimization of impellers. The results show that the Latin hypercube sampling achieves the uniform distribution of sample points in the design variable space
and the surrogate model established by neural network can accurately describe the mapping relationship between the design variables and the performance targets
and the maximum error between the performance targets obtained by the surrogate model and flow-field calculation is less than 1%. The optimal efficiency and the corresponding impeller profile under the constraint of design pressure ratio are obtained by optimization calculation. After optimization
the low velocity region and entropy increment in the impeller flow field at the design and non-design operating points both reduced
and the isentropic efficiencies of the two impellers at the design operating point were increased by 2.2% and 2%
respectively
and the efficiencies of the two impellers at the non-design operating point were increased by 2.9% and 2.2%
ZUO Shuguang, WEI Kaijun, WU Xudong, et al. Multi-objective parameter optimization of centrifugal compressor impeller with Kriging model [J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2016, 32(2): 77-83.
ZHANG Liang, XU Sichuan, WAN Yu. Multi-objective and multi-parameter optimization for centrifugal compressor used in PEM fuel cells [J]. Chinese Journal of Power Sources, 2016, 40(1): 81-83.
WANG Wenjie, YUAN Shouqi, PEI Ji, et al. Two-point hydraulic optimization of pump impeller based on Kriging model and neighborhood cultivation genetic algorithm [J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2015, 51(15): 53-58.
LUO Ming, ZUO Zhitao, LI Hongyang, et al. Multi-objective optimization design of centrifugal compressor impeller based on BP artificial neural work [J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2016, 31(10): 2424-2431.
SUN Xiaodong, HAN Wanjin. The study of multiple loading conditions optimization design of the blade of transonic compressor [J]. Turbine Technology, 2010, 52(1): 24-26.
LIU Xiaomin, ZHANG Wenbin. Multi-objective automatic optimization design of centrifugal impeller based on genetic algorithm [J]. Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University, 2010, 44(1): 31-35.
WANG X F, XI G, WANG Z H. Aerodynamic optimization design of centrifugal compressor's impeller with Kriging model [J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers: Part A Journal of Power and Energy, 2006, 220(6): 589-597.
HA K K, KANG S H. An optimization method for centrifugal compressor design using the surrogate management framework [C]∥Proceedings of the ASME-JSME-KSME 2011 Joint Fluids Engineering Conference. New York, USA: ASME, 2011: 1-6.
GUO Shuai, DUAN Fei, TANG Hui, et al. Multi-objective optimization for centrifugal compressor of mini turbojet engine [J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2014, 39(1): 414-425.
KHALFALLAH S, GHENAIET A, BENINI E, et al. Surrogate-based shape optimization of stall margin and efficiency of a centrifugal compressor [J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2015, 31(6): 1-14.
WAN Y, GUAN J, XU S. Improved empirical parameters design method for centrifugal compressor in PEM fuel cell vehicle application [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42(8): 5590-5605.
WAN Yu, XU Sichuan, ZHANG Liang. Multi-operating condition optimal design of centrifugal impeller for fuel cell vehicle application based on parameterization of impeller profile [J]. Journal of Tongji University, 2017, 45(1): 98-108.
MONTGOMERY D C. Design and analysis of experiments [M]. 9th ed. Berlin, Germany: Wiley, 2017.
YAMADA K, KAMI H, TSUKUMO J, et al. Handwritten numeral recognition by multilayered neural network with improved learning algorithm [C]∥International 1989 Joint Conference on Neural Networks. Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE, 1989: 259-266.
SMOLA A J, SCHÖLKOPF B. A tutorial on support vector regression [J]. Statistics and Computing, 2004, 14(3): 199-222.
HAN Zhonghua. Kriging surrogate model and its application to design optimization: a review of recent progress [J]. Acta aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2016, 37(11): 3197-3225.
BIANCHINI M, FRASCONI P. Learning without local minima in radial basis function networks [J]. IEEE Trans on Neural Networks, 1995, 6(3): 749-756.
DEB K. Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms [M]. Berlin, Germany: Wiley, 2002.
MOSTAGHIM S, TRAUTMANN H, MERSMANN O. Preference-based multi-objective particle swarm optimization using desirabilities [C]∥11th International Conference on Parallel Problem Solving from Nature. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 2010: 101-110.
LI H, SILVA D L. Evolutionary multi-objective simulated annealing with adaptive and competitive search direction [C]∥IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation. Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE, 2008: 3311-3318.
XIAO Jun, ZHAO Yuanyang, WANG Le. Influence of discretization of turbulence equation diffusion terms on flow field computation of a radial impeller [J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2014, 29(1): 153-160.
XIAO Jun, ZHAO Yuanyang, WANG Le. Analysis of flow response to centrifugal intake pressure pulse in an impeller [J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2013, 34(11): 1482-1492.
MCKAY M D, BECKMAN R J, CONOVER W J. A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code [J]. Technometrics, 1979, 21(2): 239-245.
SEYEDALI M, SEYED M M, ANDREW L. Grey wolf optimizer [J]. Advances in Engineering Software, 2014, 69: 46-61.
SEYEDALI M, SHAHRZAD S, SEYED M M, et al. Multi-objective grey wolf optimizer: a novel algorithm for multi-criterion optimization [J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2016, 47: 106-119.