Due to the traditional cross entropy algorithm is unable to solve multi-objective optimization problem
an improved multi-objective cross entropy optimization(MOCEO)algorithm is proposed based on the single target cross entropy optimization algorithm. The individual selection mechanism is adopted to retain the elite individuals in the evolution process
and the distribution information is extracted via the elite retention strategy to constantly correct the parameters of the normal distribution probability model of the algorithm. Then the evolution direction in the traditional normal distribution population is introduced. During the sampling process
the new individuals are guided to the spatial distribution of the solution so that the population evolves towards the improvement of performance. To avoid the algorithm falling into local optimum
the adjustment coefficient is defined in the process of the traditional parameter smoothing operation. Adjusting the parameters of the normal distribution probability model
premature convergence of the algorithm is effectively avoided. This paper implements the MOCEO and compares it in terms of the hyper volume
the inverted generational distance performance indications and the evolutionary speed with the NSGA-II
SPEA2
MOEAD
PAES algorithms using the ZDT and DTLZ test functions. The results indicate that MOCEO is superior to the other algorithms with fast convergence
strong searching ability and high robustness. An optimization for parameters of horizontal stability control system of a high-speed train suspension system verifies the effect of MOCEO. Compared with the NSGA-II algorithm
the lateral stability index of the train body is increased by 4.16% and the peak value of lateral acceleration is reduced by 10.34% by adjusting the MOCEO optimization parameters of the control system. The lateral vibration acceleration of the vehicle body is improved in the frequency range of 1-2 Hz
to which human body is sensitive
and the train achieves better lateral stability.
关键词
Keywords
references
CELESTE F, DAMBREVILLE F, LE CADRE J P. Optimal path planning using cross-entropy method [C]∥2006 9th International Conference on Information Fusion. Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE, 2006: 1-8.
JALOCON C L C, NERVES A C. Renewable energy portfolio planning using the cross entropy method [C]∥Proceedings of 2013 IEEE PES Asia-Pacific Power and Energy Engineering Conference. Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE, 2013: 1-5.
CASERTA M, RICO E Q, URIBE A M. A cross entropy algorithm for the Knapsack problem with setups [J]. Computers Operations Research, 2008, 35(1): 241-252.
HABER R E, DEL TORO R M, GAJATE A. Optimal fuzzy control system using the cross-entropy method: a case study of a drilling process [J]. Information Sciences, 2010, 180(14): 2777-2792.
BOER P T D, KROESE D P, MANNOR S, et al. A tutorial on the cross-entropy method [J]. Annals of Operations Research, 2005, 134(1): 19-67.
AN S, YANG S, HO S L, et al. An improved cross-entropy method applied to inverse problems [J]. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 2012, 48(2): 327-330.
LI J, CHAI T Y, GONG J K. Design of PID controller using cross entropy method [J]. Control and Decision, 2011, 26(5): 794-796.
GIAGKIOZIS I, PURSHOUSE R C, FLEMING P J. Generalized decomposition and cross entropy methods for many-objective optimization [J]. Information Sciences, 2014, 282: 363-387.
BIAN Li, CHE Xiangqian, ZHANG Shaoqing. Multi-objective unequally-spaced array synthesis based on modified cross entropy algorithm [J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2014, 48(3): 372-376.
BERUVIDES G, QUIZA R, HABER R E. Multi-objective optimization based on an improved cross-entropy method: a case study of a micro-scale manufacturing process [J]. Information Sciences, 2016, 334: 161-173.
ZHOU Hongtao, YANG Shaopu, ZHU Hongxia. Fuzzy control strategy applied in lateral semi-active control of the high-speed locomotive [J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2011, 30(9): 145-149.
DEB K, PRATAP A, AGAREAL S, et al. A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II [J]. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2002, 6(2): 182-197.
ZIZTLER E, LAUMANNS M, THIELE L. SPEA2: improving the strength Pareto evolutionary algorithm for multi-objective optimization: TIK-Report 103 [R]. Zurich, Switzerland: Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, 2001: 1-21.
ZHANG Q, LI H. MOEA/D: a multi objective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition [J]. IEEE Transactions on evolutionary computation, 2007, 11(6): 712-731.
KNOWLES J D, CORNE D W. Approximating the nondominated front using the Pareto archived evolution strategy [J]. Evolutionary Computation, 2000, 8(2): 149-172.
RUBINSTEIN R Y. Optimization of computer simulation models with rare events [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1997, 99(1): 89-112.
KROESE D P, POROTSKY S, RUBINSTEIN R Y. The cross-entropy method for continuous multi-extremal optimization [J]. Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, 2006, 8(3): 383-407.
DENG Tao, LIN Chunsong, LI Yanan, et al. A multi-objective optimization method for energy management control of hybrid electric vehicles using NSGA-II algorithm [J]. Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University, 2015, 49(10): 143-150.
ZITZLER E, DEB K, THIELE L. Comparison of multi-objective evolutionary algorithms: empirical results [J]. Evolutionary Computation, 2000, 8(2): 173-195.
RUSSO L M S, FRANCISCO A P. Quick hypervolume [J]. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2014, 18(4): 481-502.
DURILLO J J, NEBRO A J. jMetal: a Java framework for multi-objective optimization [J]. Advances in Engineering Software, 2011, 42(10): 760-771.
LI Zhongqi, YANG Zhencun, YANG Hui. Generalized predictive control with dual adaptation method of high speed train [J]. China Railway Science, 2015, 36(6): 120-127.