Experimental Investigation on Resistance Characteristics of Thin and Long Throttling Orifices and Evaluation of the Resistance Correlations[J]. 2018, 52(7): 87-93.
DOI:
Experimental Investigation on Resistance Characteristics of Thin and Long Throttling Orifices and Evaluation of the Resistance Correlations[J]. 2018, 52(7): 87-93.DOI: 10.7652/xjtuxb201807013.
Experimental Investigation on Resistance Characteristics of Thin and Long Throttling Orifices and Evaluation of the Resistance Correlations
To study the resistance characteristics of thin and long throttling orifices with change of geometric size
experimental research was carried out with deionized water under high temperature and high pressure conditions. Experimental results showed that the diameter of orifice is the decisive factor influencing resistance
and the length of orifice has a small influence on resistance; the diameter of the pipe has little influence on the resistance when the mass flow is constant. On the basis of the experimental data
evaluations of the existing orifice resistance calculation correlations were conducted. It is found that the existing correlations with narrow application ranges are not pr
ecise
and some correlations do not take the influence of orifice length on its resistance into account. Considering the influences of orifice length
orifice diameter and Reynolds number on the orifice resistance
a new correlation with higher prediction accuracy is presented. This new correlation can be used to accurately predict the resistance characteristics of the orifices with the length-to-diameter ratios between 5 and 70 and the Reynolds number between 1.5×10
5
and 3.0×10
6
providing a reliable basis for the design and application of thin and long throttling orifices.
LIU Changliang, WANG Xiaojiang, QU Changming. Calculating pressure loss of throttling orifice in nuclear power plant [J]. Atomic Energy Science and Technology, 2013, 47(3): 397-401.
HUANG Shanfang, MA Taiyi, YEXIN Quwen, et al. Pressure drop of perforated orifice in single-phase flow [C]∥Proceedings of 18th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering. New York, USA: ASME, 2010: 107-115.
LIU Yinshui, YANG Yousheng, ZHU Yuquan, et al. Theoretical and experimental research on cavitation flow of orifices using water as working media [J]. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2007(2): 147-150.
魏起森. 柴油机喷油嘴内部空化现象的研究 [D]. 洛阳: 河南科技大学, 2011: 1-4.
KOJASO G, LANDIS F, KWAME-MENSAH P, et al. Two-phase pressure drop in multiple thick- and thin-orifice plates [J]. Experimental Thermal Fluid Science, 1997, 15(4): 347-358.
BRENNEN C E. Cavitation and bubble dynamics [M]. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 1995: 217-240.
YE Chao, WANG Hongrui, CHEN Erfeng, et al. Numerical simulation on the cavitation in liquid throttling [J]. Cryogenics Superconductivity, 2015, 43(1): 15-20.
JANKOWSKI T A, SCHMIERER E N, PRENGER F C, et al. A series pressure drop representation for flow through orifice tubes [J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2008, 130(5): 589-603.
NAKAYAMA Y. Action of the fluid in the air-micrometer: 2nd report Characteristics of small-diameter nozzle and orifice: No. 2 in the case of compressibility being considered [J]. Bulletin of JSME, 1961, 4(15): 516-524.
YU B, FU P F, ZHANG T, et al. The influence of back pressure on the flow discharge coefficients of plain orifice nozzle [J]. International Journal of Heat Fluid Flow, 2013, 44(4): 509-514.
CHISHOLM D. Two-phase flow in pipelines and heat exchangers [M]. Essex, UK: G. Godwin in Association with Institution of Chemical Engineers, 1983: 167-183.
景思睿, 张鸣远. 流体力学 [M]. 西安: 西安交通大学出版社, 2001: 175-176.
FRIED E, IDELCHIK I E. Flow resistance: a design guide for engineers [M]. New York, USA: Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, 1989: 69-75.
SANGHANI C. Comparison of experimental, theoretical and simulation result for pressure drop in sharp edged orifice meter [J]. International Journal of Science, Engineering and Technology Research, 2016, 5(3): 775-778.