Re-Definition of Asperity-Peak for Deterministic Contact Model on Rough Surfaces

doi:10.7652/xjtuxb201611018

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Re-Definition of Asperity-Peak for Deterministic Contact Model on Rough Surfaces

更新时间：2025-07-09

- Re-Definition of Asperity-Peak for Deterministic Contact Model on Rough Surfaces
- Vol. 50, Issue 11, Pages: 115-120(2016)
- 作者机构：
  
  重庆大学汽车工程学院,重庆,400044
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.7652/xjtuxb201611018
  CLC： O343.3
- Online First：10 November 2016，
  
  Published：2016
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
Re-Definition of Asperity-Peak for Deterministic Contact Model on Rough Surfaces[J]. 2016, 50(11): 115-120.
DOI：

Re-Definition of Asperity-Peak for Deterministic Contact Model on Rough Surfaces[J]. 2016, 50(11): 115-120. DOI： 10.7652/xjtuxb201611018.

摘要

为了解决目前不同微凸峰确定准则所等效的接触模型中可能存在峰的不连续、重叠、丢失而造成接触过程中缺失基准

从而导致粗糙表面在相互作用过程中不能进行有效计算等问题

在3点峰和3点谷的基础上

定义当3个连续峰的中间峰高于相邻峰时为真峰、当3个连续谷的中间谷低于相邻谷时为真谷

并对其进行匹配得到“谷-峰-谷”模式的微凸峰。通过一组粗糙表面

分析了不同的采样间隔和粗糙度对峰数量、平均峰半径和峰高度的影响

并与文献中不同的准则进行了对比。结果表明:不同微凸峰确定准则所等效的模型具有很大的不确定性; 随着采样间隔的增加

峰数量明显减少

平均峰半径和峰高度增大

当采样间隔小于0.5 μm时

不同的确定准则影响减小; 随着粗糙度的降低

峰数量略微增多

平均峰半径增大

平均峰高度减小。该模式的微凸峰为接触特性的演化提供了一个基准。

Abstract

No baseline exists to evaluate the contact characteristics for deterministic contact model owing to the discontinuity

overlapping and missing of the asperity-peak. Based on the criteria of 3-point peak and 3-point valley

the middle higher peak or lower valley can be firstly identified as the true one in the three continuous peaks or valleys

and then a new asperity-peak of “valley-peak-valley” mode is defined. The proposed criterion is validated through a set of different surface profiles

and compared with other criteria found in the literature. The results show the huge influence obtained after using these different criteria. The number of asperity peaks decreases obviously with the increasing sampling interval

however

the mean asperity-peak radii and heights increase. The effects of different criteria on the calculated asperity-peak properties become almost negligible when the sampling interval is below 0.5 μm. The number of asperity peaks increases slightly with the decreasing surface roughness

and a similar tendency is found for the mean radii while the mean heights have an opposite effect. This criterion can provide a baseline for the evolution of the contact characteristics.

关键词

Keywords

references

GREENWOOD J A, WILLIAMSON J B P. Contact of nominally flat surfaces [J]. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 1966, 295: 300-319.

GREENWOOD J A. A simplified elliptic model of rough surface contact [J]. Wear, 2006, 261(2): 191-200.

NAYAK P R. Random process model of rough surfaces [J]. Journal of Lubrication Technology, 1971, 93(3): 398-407.

MAJUMDAR A, BHUSHAN B. Fractal model of elastic-plastic contact between rough surfaces [J]. Journal of Tribology, 1991, 113(1): 1-11.

BRIZMER V, ZAIT Y, KLIGERMAN Y, et al. The effect of contact conditions and material properties on elastic-plastic spherical contact [J]. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 2006, 43(18): 5736-5749.

赵波, 戴旭东, 张执南, 等. 单峰接触研究及其在分形表面接触中的应用 [J]. 摩擦学学报, 2014, 34(2): 217-224.

ZHAO Bo, DAI Xudong, ZHANG Zhinan, et al. Single asperity contact and its use for fractal surface contact [J]. Tribology, 2014, 34(2): 217-224.

PERSSON B N J. Contact mechanics for randomly rough surfaces: on the validity of the method of reduction of dimensionality [J]. Tribology Letters, 2015, 58(1): 1-4.

田红亮, 陈甜敏, 郑金华, 等. 平行轴圆柱副接触分析 [J]. 西安交通大学学报, 2016, 50(1): 8-15.

TIAN Hongliang, CHEN Tianmin, ZHENG Jinhua, et al. Contact analysis of cylindrical pair with parallel axes [J]. Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University, 2016, 50(1): 8-15.

GHOSH A, SADEGHI F. A novel approach to model effects of surface roughness parameters on wear [J]. Wear, 2015, 338/339: 73-94.

GREENWOOD J A. A unified theory of surface roughness [J]. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 1984, 393: 133-157.

TOMANIK E. Modeling of the asperity contact area on actual 3D surfaces: SAE 2005-01-1864 [R]. Washington, DC, USA: SAE, 2005.

POGAACˇUNIK A, KALIN M. How to determine the number of asperity peaks, their radii and their heights for engineering surfaces: a critical appraisal [J]. Wear, 2013, 300(1/2): 143-154.

POON C Y, BHUSHAN B. Surface roughness analysis of glass-ceramic substrates and finished magnetic disks, and Ni-P coated AlMg and glass substrates [J]. Wear, 1995, 190(1): 89-109.

BIGERELLE M, NIANGA J M, NAJJAR D, et al. Roughness signature of tribological contact calculated by a new method of peaks curvature radius estimation on fractal surfaces [J]. Tribology International, 2013, 65(3): 235-247.

王庆朋, 张力, 尚会超, 等. 考虑应变硬化的混合弹塑性接触模型 [J]. 西安交通大学学报, 2016, 50(2): 132-137.

WANG Qingpeng, ZHANG Li, SHANG Huichao, et al. Mixed elastic-plastic contact model considering strain hardening [J]. Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University, 2016, 50(2): 132-137.

Views

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

A Finite Difference Frequency Domain Method for Waveguide with Rough Surface and Imperfect Conductor

Contact Behavior Analysis for Rough Surfaces with Random Sampling

An Improved Analytical Model for Normal Elastic-Plastic Contact of Rough Surfaces

Tangential Load-Displacement Model of Elastic-Plastic Rough Contact Surfaces

Application of Conical Asperity in Contact Analysis of Rough Surfaces

Related Author

蒋延生 1

宁曰民 2

胡红 1

黄斌科 1

许志倩 1

闫相祯 2

杨秀娟 2

秦志坚 3

Related Institution

School of Electronics and Information Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University

College of Mechanical and Electronic Engineering, China University of Petroleum

School of Astronautics, Northwestern Polytechnical University

Institute of Systems Engineering, China Academy of Engineering Physics

College of Mechanical and Power Engineering, China Three Gorges University

⁰