A comprehensive evaluation strategy is proposed to deal with the evaluation of various trajectory optimization algorithms for the hypersonic reentry vehicle. An integrated index system is established by taking the stability and real-time performance of each algorithm itself as well as the feasibility
security
transitivity and optimality of its optimization result into account. And the calculation of index weights is transformed into an optimization problem based on the pairwise judgement matrix of the analytic hierarchy process
and the Euclidean distance and the number of violations are used as precision measures. The genetic algorithm is used to solve the optimization problem. Then
the normalized decision matrix is obtained
and a weighted grey technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution(TOPSIS)is proposed by synthesizing the nearness degree in both the space and curve between the algorithm data and the ideal control groups to achieve the final evaluation results. Simulation results show that the proposed strategy uses objective data to quantify the performance of trajectory optimization algorithms
and forms a comparative evaluation standard for various algorithms. The strategy can help designers quickly select an optimal algorithm according to different mission requirements and avoid blindness and subjectivity.
关键词
Keywords
references
ZHAO J, ZHOU R, JIN X. Progress in reentry trajectory planning for hypersonic vehicle [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2014, 25(4): 627-639.
TANCREDI U, GRASSI M, CORRARO F, et al. Robustness analysis for terminal phases of reentry flight [J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2009, 32(5): 1679-1683.
HANSON J, JONES R, KRUPP D. Advanced guidance and control methods for reusable launch vehicles: test results [C]∥Proceedings of AIAA Guidance Navigation and Control Conference. Reston, VA, USA: AIAA, 2002: 4561-4569.
BRUNNER C W, LU P. Comparison of fully numerical predictor-corrector and Apollo skip entry guidance algorithms [J]. The Journal of the Astronautical Sciences, 2012, 59(3): 517-540.
MA Weihua. Research on evaluation method of guidance and control performance for hypersonic vehicle [J]. Aerospace Control, 2012, 30(4): 7-12.
RINAT K, BEN-ASHER J Z. Worst-case distributions for performance evaluation of proportionally guided missiles [J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2000, 23(5): 895-898.
DONG Chunyun, CAI Yuanli. Orthogonal design based evaluation for trajectory optimization algorithms [C]∥The 32nd Chinese Control Conference. Beijing: Technical Committee on Control Theory, Chinese Association of Automation, 2013: 8542-8545.
SAATY T L. Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process [J]. International Journal of Services Sciences, 2008, 1(1): 83-98.
SIRAJ S, MIKHAILOV L, KEANE J A. Preference elicitation from inconsistent judgments using multi-objective optimization [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2012, 220(2): 461-471.
OLSON D L. Comparison of weights in TOPSIS models [J]. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 2004, 40(7): 721-727.
WU H H. A comparative study of using grey relational analysis in multiple attribute decision making problems [J]. Quality Engineering, 2002, 15(2): 209-217.
HUA Xiaoyi, TAN Jingxin. Revised TOPSIS method based on vertical projection distance: vertical projection method [J]. Systems Engineering: Theory Practice, 2004, 24(1): 114-119.
FAHROO F, ROSS I M. Direct trajectory optimization by a Chebyshev pseudospectral method [J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2002, 25(1): 160-166.
RAHIMI A, DEV KUMAR K, ALIGHANBARI H. Particle swarm optimization applied to spacecraft reentry trajectory [J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2012, 36(1): 307-310.
PHILLIPS T H. A common aero vehicle model, description and employment guide [R]. New York, USA: Schafer Corporation for AFRL and AFSPC, 2003.