Heterogeneous Data Fusion and Intelligent Maintenance Decision for High Speed Railway Signaling Systems[J]. 2015, 49(1): 72-78.
DOI:
Heterogeneous Data Fusion and Intelligent Maintenance Decision for High Speed Railway Signaling Systems[J]. 2015, 49(1): 72-78.DOI: 10.7652/xjtuxb201501012.
Heterogeneous Data Fusion and Intelligent Maintenance Decision for High Speed Railway Signaling Systems
A framework of integrated heterogeneous data and intelligent maintenance decision was proposed aiming at the multi-source heterogeneous data in intelligent maintenance decision for railway signaling systems. By means of transformation and fusion from local resource description framework(schema)(RDF(S))to global RDF(S)
the fusion of heterogeneous data was realized. In addition
a Bayesian net(BN)based intelligent maintenance decision model was constructed by combing the structural expectation maximum(SEM)algorithm for missing data with the expert knowledge. The correctness and efficiency of the proposed framework and the RDF(S)fusion algorithm were verified by the maintenance data from Wuhan-Guangzhou high-speed railway signaling systems in 2011-2012. The experimental results show that the computational complexity of the proposed ontology fusion algorithm is polynomial
and the average accuracy of the fault diagnosis for the first level reaches 92.4%. Therefore
the proposed framework may improve the accuracy and efficiency of the intelligent maintenance decision of high-speed railway systems.
关键词
Keywords
references
ABANDA H, NG'OMBE A, TAH J, et al. An ontology-driven decision support system for land delivery in Zambia [J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2011, 38(9): 10896-10905.
VERSTICHEL S, ONGENAE F, LOEVE L, et al. Efficient data integration in the railway domain through an ontology-based methodology [J]. Transportation Research: Part C, 2011, 19: 617-643.
SAA R, GARCIA A, GOMEZ C, et al. An ontology-driven decision support system for high-performance and cost-optimized design of complex railway portal frames [J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2012, 39: 8784-8792.
LIU Z, HUANG L, XU D. Research on semantic retrieval system for high-speed railway knowledge based on ontology [C]∥International Colloquium on Computing, Communication, Control, and Management. Piscataway, USA: IEEE, 2008: 303-307.
HAN Chunhua, YI Sirong, LV Xikui. GIS based railway location intelligent environment and domain ontology modeling method [J]. China Railway Science, 2006, 27(6): 84-90.
CHOUGULE R, RAJPATHAK D, BANDYOPADHYAY P. An integrated framework for effective service and repair in the automotive domain: an application of association mining and case-based-reasoning [J]. Computers in Industry, 2011, 62: 742-754.
European Commission. European railway open maintenance system. [EB/OL]. [2014-06-30]. http:∥www.transport-research.info/web/projects/project_details.cfm?id=15048.
European Commission. Intelligent integration of railway systems. [DB/OL]. [2014-06-30]. http:∥www.integrail.info/.
FERREIRO S, ARNAIZ A, SIERRA B, et al. Application of Bayesian networks in prognostics for a new Integrated Vehicle Health Management concept [J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2012, 39(7): 6402-6418.
VONG C, WONG P, IP W. Case-based expert system using wavelet packet transform and kernel-based feature manipulation for engine ignition system [J]. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2011, 24(7): 1281-1294.
UDREA O, DENG Y, RUCKHAUS E, et al. A graph theoretical foundation for integrating RDF ontologies [C]∥Proceedings of the Twentieth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA: AAAI, 2005: 1442-1447.
HOU X, OON S K, NEE A Y C, et al. A graph-based approach for automatic construction of domain ontology [J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2011, 38: 11958-11975.
FRIEDMAN N. Learning belief networks in the presence of missing values and hidden variables [C]∥Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Machine Learning. San Francisco, USA: ADM, 1997: 125-133.
NIELSEN J D, RUMÍ R, SALMERN A. Structural-EM for learning PDG models from incomplete data [J]. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 2010, 51: 515-530.