Comparison of Explicit Central Difference Method and Implicit Newmark Method Using Chebyshev Spectral Element Method for Wave Equations
|更新时间:2025-07-09
|
Comparison of Explicit Central Difference Method and Implicit Newmark Method Using Chebyshev Spectral Element Method for Wave Equations
Vol. 42, Issue 9, Pages: 1142-1145(2008)
作者机构:
西安交通大学能源与动力工程学院,西安,710049
作者简介:
基金信息:
DOI:
CLC:O353
Online First:10 September 2008,
Published:2008
稿件说明:
移动端阅览
Comparison of Explicit Central Difference Method and Implicit Newmark Method Using Chebyshev Spectral Element Method for Wave Equations[J]. 2008, 42(9): 1142-1145.
DOI:
Comparison of Explicit Central Difference Method and Implicit Newmark Method Using Chebyshev Spectral Element Method for Wave Equations[J]. 2008, 42(9): 1142-1145.DOI:
Comparison of Explicit Central Difference Method and Implicit Newmark Method Using Chebyshev Spectral Element Method for Wave Equations
The explicit central difference method and the implicit Newmark method was combined with the Chebyshev spectral element method
respectively
and their influences on the numerical error and stability were studied. The process of one noise disturbance spreading in freedom space was simulated and the numerical errors of the two time-difference methods were compared with each other and the stability of the central difference method was investigated. The conclusions can be drawn that both the two time-difference methods can acquire right numerical result. The explicit central difference method has higher accuracy than the implicit one and the numerical error of the Newmark method is about twice that of the explicit central difference method when the central difference method is stable. Moreover
the result of central difference method is divergent when the time step used is larger than the critical step while the numerical result of the Newmark method still is coincident with the reference solution obtained by the analytical method.
关键词
Keywords
references
MAK C M. A prediction method for aerodynamic sound produced by multiple elements in air ducts [J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2005, 287(1/2): 395-403.
HAN Ning, QIU Xiaojun, MAK C M. A further study of the prediction method for aerodynamic sound produced by two in-duct elements[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2006, 294(1/2):374-380.
GEZA S. An iterative time-stepping method for solving first-order time dependent problems and its application to the wave equation [J]. Journal of Computational Acoustics, 2000, 8(1):241-255.